Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / FiveManBand

Go To

Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there with very little, if any, justification text.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.

EDIT 2: The page \\\'\\\'\\\'itself\\\'\\\'\\\' agrees with me! Take this notice from after the section on \\\"Associated Character Tropes\\\" (emphasis mine):

[[quoteblock]]Note: Variations occur where the core five are different \\\'\\\'\\\'or overlap.\\\'\\\'\\\' Don\\\'t take the title too literally — it\\\'s \\\'\\\'\\\'the roles\\\'\\\'\\\' \\\'\\\'more than\\\'\\\' the numbers that matter.[[/quoteblock]]

Or, in AceAttorney [[http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=4796009 form]]. (I don\\\'t think they can handle italics there.)
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
# One character is pulling double duty (fulfilling two roles, i.e. a GeniusBruiser combining both TheBigGuy and TheSmartGuy). But they must \'\'obviously\'\' be doing so. In this case, the same character can \'\'not\'\' be both TheHero and TheLancer.
to:
# One character is pulling double duty (fulfilling two roles). But they must \\\'\\\'obviously\\\'\\\' be doing so. In this case, the same character can \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' be both TheHero and TheLancer.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there with very little, if any, justification text.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
# One character is pulling double duty (fulfilling two roles). But they must \'\'obviously\'\' be doing so. In this case, the same character can \'\'not\'\' be both TheHero and TheLancer.
to:
# One character is pulling double duty (fulfilling two roles, i.e. a GeniusBruiser combining both TheBigGuy and TheSmartGuy). But they must \\\'\\\'obviously\\\'\\\' be doing so. In this case, the same character can \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' be both TheHero and TheLancer.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there with very little, if any, justification text.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
A key point to remember is that the Five Man (and Five Bad) Band Tropes are built around roles within a team. This is as opposed to the [[FourTemperamentEnsemble Four Temperament]] and [[FourGirlEnsemble Four Girl]] Ensembles, which focus more on personalities. To that end, PowerTrio, as currently devised, is set along a sliding scale of personalities, as opposed to the multi-dimensional Ensemble. [[SixStudentClique Cliques]] tend to depend on a mix of personality and appearance (which shouldn\'t be surprising given [[HighSchoolAU where they usually operate]][[hottip:*:AU qualifier optional]].)
to:
A key point to remember is that the Five Man (and Five Bad) Band Tropes are built around roles within a team. This is as opposed to the [[FourTemperamentEnsemble Four Temperament]] and [[FourGirlEnsemble Four Girl]] Ensembles, which focus more on personalities. To that end, PowerTrio, as currently devised, is set along a sliding scale of personalities, as opposed to the multi-dimensional Ensemble. [[SixStudentClique Cliques]] tend to depend on a mix of personality and appearance (which shouldn\\\'t be surprising given [[HighSchoolAU where they usually operate]][[hottip:*:AU qualifier optional]]).
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there with very little, if any, justification text.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there with very little, if any, justification text.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
# Each character plays one role with the leftover role is \'\'obviously\'\' shared by two people. EDIT: There still has to be a \'\'\'single, obvious\'\'\' [[TheHero Leader]] and, again, that Leader can\'t share the part of TheLancer. (The other 3 roles are fair game.)
to:
# Each character plays one role with the leftover role is \\\'\\\'obviously\\\'\\\' shared by two people. EDIT: There still has to be a \\\'\\\'\\\'single, obvious\\\'\\\'\\\' [[TheHero Hero]] and, again, that Hero can\\\'t share the part of TheLancer. (The other 3 roles are fair game.)
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there without more than a sentence (or so) of justification.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
# Each character plays one role with the leftover role is \'\'obviously\'\' shared by two people.
to:
# Each character plays one role with the leftover role is \\\'\\\'obviously\\\'\\\' shared by two people. EDIT: There still has to be a \\\'\\\'\\\'single, obvious\\\'\\\'\\\' [[TheHero Leader]] and, again, that Leader can\\\'t share the part of TheLancer. (The other 3 roles are fair game.)
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there without more than a sentence (or so) of justification.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there without more than a sentence (or so) of justification.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], [[TheObiwan mentors]] ([[BigBrotherMentor Big Sibling]] or otherwise), and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there without more than a sentence (or so) of justification.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick / TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there without more than a sentence (or so) of justification.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.

EDIT: Just so you know, I\\\'ve always held that the five main \\\'\\\'Tropes\\\'\\\' for the Band are a requirement for that band. i.e. only TheHero, TheLancer, TheBigGuy, TheSmartGuy, and TheChick/TheHeart can be members of the band proper. There is still room for [[SixthRanger Sixth Rangers]], [[TagalongKid kids]] and [[TeamPet pets]], and [[MissionControl Missions Control]], but these are not actual team \\\'\\\'members\\\'\\\'.

And, again, the role-based nature of the Bands make it more attractive than Ensembles, which are personality based. Which admittedly does lend more easily to misuse.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \
to:
As emphasized in both points, the key word is \\\"obvious.\\\" The margin for error in accepting reduced teams \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be less than accepting full teams. i.e. The roles \\\'\\\'have\\\'\\\' to be there without more than a sentence (or so) of justification.

Though it may be prudent to [[YouKnowThatThingWhere create a separate Trope for that]]. FourManBand perhaps? Alternately, we may need a handy guide to [[SquarePegRoundTrope converting]] FourTemperamentEnsemble roles to FiveManBand roles (or FiveBadBand roles).

As for \\\"teams\\\" of 2 or 3 or 7+, yeah, mainly needs dropping unless, in the case of the latter, if a subset of 5 fits all 5 roles \\\'\\\'\\\'exactly with \\\'\\\'one and only one\\\'\\\' character per role\\\'\\\'\\\'. (In that case, redact the outside members unless they form their own [~5MB~]. On the other hand, a series with [[GeodesicCast multiple Five Man Bands]] can have two teams share one (at most) member. Bonus points if the shared member fills two different roles between the two teams \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' neither role is TheHero. Also acceptable IMO are teams that shift their rosters over time while retaining members.

As for the \\\'\\\'Mother3\\\'\\\' 3-person+[[TeamPet pet]] example, it may fit better in FiveManBandConcert.
Top