Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / StockDinosaurs

Go To

[004] ading Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has perhaps appeared only in one old film, \
to:
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\\\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has perhaps appeared only in one old film, \\\"Thick nose\\\" only in Disney\\\'s Dinosaur and one of the LandBeforeTime sequels (not much...), while Torosaurus seems more a documentary animal (WalkingWithDinosaurs), as well as Monoclonius and Centrosaurus (Cronkite\\\'s Dinosaur!)... Furthermore, the ceratopsid list in UsefulNotes appears disproportionately short compared to the others. If we ask laymen about these ceratopsians, they\\\'ll respond these are simply Triceratops. Only Styracosaurus is usually not confused with the latter because of its look, and has made several apparitions in films since the 1920s, so I think it is secundary stock.

I\\\'m a fan of Baryonyx (it used to be my favourite large theropod when i was kid). Since it was portrayed in the IceAges with a very relevant role.... yes, if Carnotaurus is stock, so Baryonyx would be, i think.

Anyway, MajinGojira seems the most well-informed among us about dinosaurs in pop-culture, we should tell him for the final word.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has perhaps appeared only in one old film, \
to:
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\\\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has perhaps appeared only in one old film, \\\"Thick nose\\\" only in Disney\\\'s Dinosaur and one of the LandBeforeTime sequels (not much...), while Torosaurus seems more a documentary animal (WalkingWith), as well as Monoclonius and Centrosaurus (Cronkite\\\'s Dinosaur!)... Furthermore, the ceratopsid list in UsefulNote appears disproportionately short compared to the others. If we ask laymen about these ceratopsians, they\\\'ll respond these are simply Triceratops. Only Styracosaurus is usually not confused with the latter because of its look, and has made several apparitions in films since the 1920s, so I think it is secundary stock.

I\\\'m a fan of Baryonyx (it used to be my favourite large theropod when i was kid). Since it was portrayed in the IceAges with a very relevant role.... yes, if Carnotaurus is stock, so Baryonyx would be, i think.

Anyway, MajinGojira seems the most well-informed among us about dinosaurs in pop-culture, we should tell him for the final word.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has appeared only in one old film, \
to:
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\\\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has perhaps appeared only in one old film, \\\"Thick nose\\\" only in Disney\\\'s Dinosaur and one of the LandBeforeTime sequels (not much...), while Torosaurus seems more a documentary animal (WalkingWith), as well as Monoclonius and Centrosaurus (Cronkite\\\'s Dinosaur!)... Furthermore, the ceratopsid list in UsefulNote appears disproportionately short compared to the others. If we ask laymen about these ceratopsians, they\\\'ll respond these are simply Triceratops. Only Styracosaurus is usually not confused with the latter because of its look, and has made several apparitions in films since the 1920s, so I think it is secundary stock.

I\\\'m a fan of Baryonyx (it used to be my favourite large theropod when i was kid). Since it was portrayed in the IceAges with a very relevant role.... yes, if Carnotaurus is stock, so Baryonyx would be, i think.

Anyway, MajinGojira seems the most well-informed among us about dinosaurs in pop-culture, we should tell him for the final word.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has appeared only in one old film, \
to:
Again, I agree with you: The non-Triceratops/non-Styracosaurus ceratopsids aren\\\'t true stock in my opinion, Chasmosaurus for example has appeared only in one old film, \\\"Thick nose\\\" only in Disney\\\'s Dinosaur and one of the LandBeforeTime sequels (not much...), while Torosaurus seems more a documentary animal (WalkingWith), as well as Monoclonius and Centrosaurus (Cronkite\\\'s Dinosaur!)... Furthermore, the ceratopsid list in UsefulNote appears disproportionately short compared to the others.

I\\\'m a fan of Baryonyx (it used to be my favourite large theropod :-) Since it was portrayed in the IceAges with a very relevant role.... yes, if Carnotaurus is stock, so Baryonyx would be, i think.

Anyway, MajinGojira seems the most well-informed among us about dinosaurs in pop-culture, we should tell him for the final word.

Top