Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is it just me or, as noted on the archived discussion, these examples are COMPLETELY INSANE? Much of the page looks as if it was written by MoralGuardians who believe that a single punch, single barely sexual reference, or single mild swear automatically mean something is MUCH too inappropriate for kids. Many people here seem to believe that children have roughly the intelligence of sponges and that a child having to undergo a sort of thought process or watch some sort of slightly objectionable content would scar them for life. I realize that I\'m exaggerating [[{{Understatement}} a bit,]] but this is plain ridiculous.
to:
Why are the people here going batshit insane over slightly innapropriate things for kids. Parents really shouldn\\\'t be freaking out just because someone said damn, or because there\\\'s some blood here and there, or someone said a minor innuendo.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is it just me or, as noted on the archived discussion, these examples are COMPLETELY INSANE? Much of the page looks as if it was written by MoralGuardians who believe that a single punch, single barely sexual reference, or single mild swear automatically mean something is MUCH too inappropriate for kids. Many people here seem to believe that children have roughly the intelligence of sponges and that a child having to undergo a sort of thought process or watch some sort of slightly objectionable content would scar them for life. I realize that I\'m exaggerating [[{{Understatement}}a bit,]] but this is plain ridiculous.
to:
Is it just me or, as noted on the archived discussion, these examples are COMPLETELY INSANE? Much of the page looks as if it was written by MoralGuardians who believe that a single punch, single barely sexual reference, or single mild swear automatically mean something is MUCH too inappropriate for kids. Many people here seem to believe that children have roughly the intelligence of sponges and that a child having to undergo a sort of thought process or watch some sort of slightly objectionable content would scar them for life. I realize that I\\\'m exaggerating [[{{Understatement}} a bit,]] but this is plain ridiculous.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is it just me or, as noted on the archived discussion, these examples seem COMPLETELY INSANE. Much of the page looks as if it was written by MoralGuardians who believe that a single punch, single barely sexual reference, or single mild swear automatically mean something is MUCH too inappropriate for kids. Many people here seem to believe that children have roughly the intelligence of sponges and that a child having to undergo a sort of thought process or watch some sort of slightly objectionable content would scar them for life. I realize that I\'m exaggerating [[{{Understatement}}a bit,]] but this is plain ridiculous.
to:
Is it just me or, as noted on the archived discussion, these examples are COMPLETELY INSANE? Much of the page looks as if it was written by MoralGuardians who believe that a single punch, single barely sexual reference, or single mild swear automatically mean something is MUCH too inappropriate for kids. Many people here seem to believe that children have roughly the intelligence of sponges and that a child having to undergo a sort of thought process or watch some sort of slightly objectionable content would scar them for life. I realize that I\\\'m exaggerating [[{{Understatement}}a bit,]] but this is plain ridiculous.
Top