[005]
ading
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Would it be acceptable to redirect Tropers/TrollPost here?
to:
Would it be acceptable to redirect Tropers/Troll Post here?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Would it be acceptable to redirect Tropers/Troll Post here?
to:
Would it be acceptable to redirect Tropers/TrollPost here?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type I isn\'t uniformly anywhere on the alignment spectrum. They\'re much harder to peg down than any of the other categories. They\'re the \
to:
Type I isn\\\'t uniformly anywhere on the alignment spectrum. They\\\'re much harder to peg down than any of the other categories. They\\\'re the \\\"classic\\\" definition, the actual \\\"sliding scale\\\" doesn\\\'t kick in until you hit type II.
Drawing a line at type III and saying they\\\'re good, while saying type I is variable, doesn\\\'t mean any given type III is better morally than any given type I. But there is a boundary of moral behavior which would disqualify someone from being a type III, which doesn\\\'t exist in the same capacity for a type I. Which means it is accurate to say the worst of the Type III\\\'s will be on better moral ground than the worst of the type I\\\'s.
Drawing a line at type III and saying they\\\'re good, while saying type I is variable, doesn\\\'t mean any given type III is better morally than any given type I. But there is a boundary of moral behavior which would disqualify someone from being a type III, which doesn\\\'t exist in the same capacity for a type I. Which means it is accurate to say the worst of the Type III\\\'s will be on better moral ground than the worst of the type I\\\'s.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type I isn\'t uniformly anywhere on the alignment spectrum. They\'re much harder to peg down than any of the other categories. They\'re the \
to:
Type I isn\\\'t uniformly anywhere on the alignment spectrum. They\\\'re much harder to peg down than any of the other categories. They\\\'re the \\\"classic\\\" definition, the actual \\\"sliding scale\\\" doesn\\\'t kick in until you hit type II.
Drawing a line at type III and saying they\\\'re good, while saying type I is variable, doesn\\\'t mean any given type III is better morally than any given type I.
Drawing a line at type III and saying they\\\'re good, while saying type I is variable, doesn\\\'t mean any given type III is better morally than any given type I.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type I isn\'t uniformly anywhere on the alignment spectrum. They\'re much harder to peg down than any of the other categories. They\'re the \
to:
Type I isn\\\'t uniformly anywhere on the alignment spectrum. They\\\'re much harder to peg down than any of the other categories. They\\\'re the \\\"classic\\\" definition, the actual \\\"sliding scale\\\" doesn\\\'t kick in until you hit type II.
Drawing a line at type III and saying they\\\'re good, while saying type I is variable, doesn\\\'t mean any given type III is better morally than any type I.
Drawing a line at type III and saying they\\\'re good, while saying type I is variable, doesn\\\'t mean any given type III is better morally than any type I.
