Discussion History Main / RunningTheAsylum

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button less than two days and just twelve posts into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. It\\\'s already marked as a YMMV page, and it has a thorough warning in the main text about its subjective nature. The page is, at the very least, certainly not beyond repair as the CutList specifies a page needs to be. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button less than two days and just twelve posts into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. It\\\'s already a YMMV page, and it has a thorough warning in the main text about its subjective nature. The trope is, at the very least, certainly not beyond repair as the CutList specifies a page needs to be. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button less than two days and just twelve posts into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. It\\\'s already a YMMV page, and it has a thorough warning in the main text about its subjective nature. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button less than two days and just twelve posts into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button less than two days and ten posts into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button just one day into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no more talk about repairing the page. That\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button just one day into the discussion. Let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because you find it offensive (and unfairly at that - as I\\\'ve already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, that\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button one day into the discussion. So let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded (and unfairly at that - as I already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, that\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button one day into the discussion. So let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages and the very concept of Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix the page, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded (and unfairly at that - as I already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, that\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button one day into the discussion. So let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded (and unfairly at that - as I already said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, that\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button one day into the discussion. So let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList topic at hand. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded (and unfairly at that - as I said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, that\\\'s a topic that \\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\' have been thoroughly explored in TRS before someone jumped the gun and hit the cut button a day into the discussion. So let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that direction instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded (and unfairly at that - as I said, most of the examples are \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' only about slash) that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to offer a \\\'\\\'compromise\\\'\\\' by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that direction instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to COMPROMISE by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that direction instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded that you\\\'re not even listening.

So fine, no repairing the page, let\\\'s just break this down to the CutList. There are hundreds of inbounds links and wicks, and it fits the exact same template as the rest of the Yay pages. Don\\\'t cut.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to COMPROMISE by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap, and how the page can be reworked towards that direction instead. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded that you\\\'re not even listening.

You know what? This is like talking to a wall. You attacked THIS page, and none of the other Yay pages, because it offends your sensibilities. That screams personal bias to me. There is nothing wrong with this page that isn\\\'t equally wrong with all these Yay pages. I keep trying to suggest ways to fix it, and all you keep doing is saying \\\"that\\\'s not what this page is about\\\". Thank you, Captain Obvious! I\\\'m trying to COMPROMISE by explaining the very real trope that lies hidden beneath all this subtext-Yay crap. But you\\\'re so hellbent on cutting the page because your PC sensibilities have been wounded that you\\\'re not even listening.