Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Analysis / AntiHero

Go To

[006] jate Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Type II antiheroes are simply a cooler and/or more exciting version of Type I antiheroes. Like the person above me said, they both meet most of the qualifications for a hero.
to:
Type II antiheroes are simply a cooler and/or more exciting version of Type I antiheroes. Like the person above me said, both type I and type II antiheroes meet most of the qualifications for a hero.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type I\'s are losers. As in jerk, uncool, tactless, not graceful, dull, or some combination of those characteristics. Type II\'s are simply a cooler version of Type I\'s. Like the person above me said, they both meet most of the qualifications for a hero.
to:
Type I antiheroes are losers. As in jerk, uncool, tactless, not graceful, dull, or some combination of those characteristics.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
Type II antiheroes are simply a cooler and/or more exciting version of Type I antiheroes. Like the person above me said, they both meet most of the qualifications for a hero.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Type V anti heroes would be villians in real life but in fiction the willing suspension of disbelief kicks so they are considered antiheroes.
to:
Type V anti heroes would be villians in real life but in fiction the willing suspension of disbelief kicks in so they are considered antiheroes.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Type IV anti heroes usually have good intentions and motivations but haven\'t ditched as many bad habits as the type III antihero. They usually don\'t see any need to or don\'t completely understand why they have to.
to:
Type IV anti heroes usually have good intentions and motivations but haven\\\'t ditched as many bad habits as the type III antihero. They usually don\\\'t see any need to or don\\\'t completely understand why they have to.

Type V anti heroes would be villians in real life but in fiction the willing suspension of disbelief kicks so they are considered antiheroes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type I\'s are losers. As in jerk, uncool, tactless, not graceful, dull, or some combination of those characteristics. Type II\'s are simply a cooler version of Type I\'s. Like the person above me said though they both meet most of the qualifications for a hero.
to:
Type I\\\'s are losers. As in jerk, uncool, tactless, not graceful, dull, or some combination of those characteristics. Type II\\\'s are simply a cooler version of Type I\\\'s. Like the person above me said, they both meet most of the qualifications for a hero.

Wolverine and Action heroes are what come to mind when I read about type III antiheroes. Type III antiheroes are mature, have come to grips with a harsh reality and have a few bad habits left over from a less than saintly past. Also they do good but not nice things.

Type IV anti heroes usually have good intentions and motivations but haven\\\'t ditched as many bad habits as the type III antihero. They usually don\\\'t see any need to or don\\\'t completely understand why they have to.
Top