[004]
SensuBean
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \
to:
I\\\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\\\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \\\"top 10%\\\" is to be taken non-seriously, but the notability guideline is to be taken literally.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act (and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to shrug off), but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation... Or rather I go by that if I notice something there is probably more of the sort going on that I didn\\\'t, and many editors here don\\\'t tend to use their regular handles, alternately really do just set up something temporary. As an additional note, not everyone have been open about their regular \\\"fandom community\\\" identities (yes, I\\\'m trying to be diplomatic, and no I\\\'m not referring to yourself).
To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable, I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act (and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to shrug off), but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation... Or rather I go by that if I notice something there is probably more of the sort going on that I didn\\\'t, and many editors here don\\\'t tend to use their regular handles, alternately really do just set up something temporary. As an additional note, not everyone have been open about their regular \\\"fandom community\\\" identities (yes, I\\\'m trying to be diplomatic, and no I\\\'m not referring to yourself).
To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable, I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \
to:
I\\\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\\\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \\\"top 10%\\\" is to be taken non-seriously, but the notability guideline is to be taken literally.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act (and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to shrug off), but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation... Or rather I go by that if I notice something there is probably more of the sort going on that I didn\\\'t, and many editors here don\\\'t tend to use their regular handles, alternately really do just set up something temporary. Not everyone has been completely open about their regular \\\"fandom community\\\" identities (yes, I\\\'m trying to be diplomatic, and no I\\\'m not referring to yourself).
To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable, I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act (and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to shrug off), but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation... Or rather I go by that if I notice something there is probably more of the sort going on that I didn\\\'t, and many editors here don\\\'t tend to use their regular handles, alternately really do just set up something temporary. Not everyone has been completely open about their regular \\\"fandom community\\\" identities (yes, I\\\'m trying to be diplomatic, and no I\\\'m not referring to yourself).
To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable, I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \
to:
I\\\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\\\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \\\"top 10%\\\" is to be taken non-seriously, but the notability guideline is to be taken literally.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act (and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to shrug off), but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation. To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act (and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to shrug off), but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation. To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \
to:
I\\\'ll ignore the potshot at the literalmindedness (lots of them around here), but as I listed earlier I have noticed some temporary accounts or self-promotion going on in combination with that I like yourself see plenty of fics I\\\'d consider below average. I have no problem with your argument beyond the rationalisation that the \\\"top 10%\\\" is to be taken non-seriously, but the notability guideline is to be taken literally.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act, and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to, but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation. To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
Basically, I\\\'ve at least tried to be a very reasonable class act, and no you haven\\\'t really been out of line compared to what I\\\'m used to, but you\\\'ll still have to allow yourself a similar amount of self-distance to decide at either one solution or the other, rather than simply disregard and make snide comments about any arguments whatsoever, because as I see it the system very much is broken if we give a false impression and it is extremely open to manipulation. To go with the version you appear to find the least disagreeable I\\\'ll remove all of the beginning descriptions in the meantime.
