[006]
AlleyOop
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \'\'are\'\' a large source of continued discourse where I am (some of it made it onto this site\'s forums even), and that the reaction to Rex being pro-NB was as good as it was specifically because it was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture after this facet of the discourse, but I don\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
to:
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \\\'\\\'are\\\'\\\' a large source of continued discourse where I am (widespread enough that the debate reached this site\\\'s forums even), and that the reaction to Rex being pro-NB was as good as it was specifically because it was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture after this facet of the discourse, but I don\\\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \'\'are\'\' a large source of continued discourse where I am, and that the reaction to Rex being pro-NB was as good as it was specifically because it was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture after this facet of the discourse, but I don\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
to:
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \\\'\\\'are\\\'\\\' a large source of continued discourse where I am (some of it made it onto this site\\\'s forums even), and that the reaction to Rex being pro-NB was as good as it was specifically because it was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture after this facet of the discourse, but I don\\\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \'\'are\'\' a large source of continued discourse where I am, and that Rex being pro-NB was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture, but I don\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
to:
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \\\'\\\'are\\\'\\\' a large source of continued discourse where I am, and that the reaction to Rex being pro-NB was as good as it was specifically because it was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture after this facet of the discourse, but I don\\\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \'\'is\'\' a large source of continued discourse where I am, but I don\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
to:
I can confirm that the LGBT-or-not, debated HideYourLesbians aspects of it and whether it comes off as misogynistic/homophobic because of that \\\'\\\'are\\\'\\\' a large source of continued discourse where I am, and that Rex being pro-NB was seen as a good indirect course-correction for the picture, but I don\\\'t mind the lightened language as I do know I sometimes get bogged down in describing the arguments I encounter too granularly.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Hopefully it\'s OK if I amend the entry to add back a quick mention of the LGBT debate?
to:
Hopefully it\\\'s OK if I amend the entry to add back a mention of the LGBT debate if it\\\'s short enough?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Hopefully it\'s OK if I amend the
to:
Hopefully it\\\'s OK if I amend the entry to add back a quick mention of the LGBT debate?
