[002]
NubianSatyress
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Again: the snark is unnecessary. And in this case, it\'s nonsense: I flat out asked you what was \
to:
Again: the snark is unnecessary. And in this case, it\\\'s nonsense: I flat out asked you what was \\\"against policy\\\", and that was the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' thing you brought up. It\\\'s ridiculous to start talking about \\\"bare minimum\\\" since, when asked, you \\\'\\\'literally said\\\'\\\' \\\"nothing major\\\" and then listed only that one thing.
But anyway, now that we\\\'ve come all the way back around to you disagreeing with the way the pages are split (which, again, is your lone opinion) I\\\'m again going to bow out and let other people comment if they like.
But anyway, now that we\\\'ve come all the way back around to you disagreeing with the way the pages are split (which, again, is your lone opinion) I\\\'m again going to bow out and let other people comment if they like.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Again: the snark is unnecessary. And in this case, it\'s nonsense: I flat out asked you what was \
to:
Again: the snark is unnecessary. And in this case, it\\\'s nonsense: I flat out asked you what was \\\"against policy\\\", and that was the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' thing you brought up. It\\\'s ridiculous to start talking about \\\"bare minimum\\\" since, when asked, you \\\'\\\'literally said\\\'\\\' \\\"not much\\\" and then listed only that one thing.
But anyway, now that we\\\'ve come all the way back around to you disagreeing with the way the pages are split (which, again, is your lone opinion) I\\\'m again going to bow out and let other people comment if they like.
But anyway, now that we\\\'ve come all the way back around to you disagreeing with the way the pages are split (which, again, is your lone opinion) I\\\'m again going to bow out and let other people comment if they like.
