[001]
Pine182
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have no problem referring to Hibari in a neutral way, but that\'s not what you are proposing, and that\'s not what your original edits were either. You want to sequester an equally valid (I\'d say more valid tbh) interpretation of the character away in a little blurb and make it look like it\'s just some desperate fans head canon. In fact Beedok already proposed neutral language and you turned it down. You keep brushing off other peoples views as subjective interpretation, yet refuse to accept your own interpretations as subjective and instead act like they are somehow \
to:
I have no problem referring to Hibari in a neutral way, but that\\\'s not what you are proposing, and that\\\'s not what your original edits were either. You want to sequester an equally valid (I\\\'d say more valid tbh) interpretation of the character away in a little blurb and make it look like it\\\'s just some desperate fans head canon. In fact Beedok already proposed neutral language and you turned it down. You keep brushing off other peoples views as subjective interpretation, yet refuse to accept your own interpretations as subjective and instead act like they are somehow \\\"neutral\\\".
Edit: Also, writing off every bit off evidence against you as \\\"just a joke\\\" is a huge copout.
Edit: Also, writing off every bit off evidence against you as \\\"just a joke\\\" is a huge copout.
