[002]
NubianSatyress
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Except that he was the one who caused himself to be put on drugs by refusing to heal. That\'s the entire point. He intentionally \'\'caused\'\' Flare to imprison him in the second loop by pretending he was too traumatized to heal in order to \
to:
Except that he was the one who caused himself to be put on drugs by refusing to heal. That\\\'s the entire point. He intentionally \\\'\\\'caused\\\'\\\' Flare to imprison him in the second loop by pretending he was too traumatized to heal in order to \\\"absorb abilities\\\", when it was already established that he can do that anyway. It doesn\\\'t matter if he couldn\\\'t do anything about it when he was on drugs, when \\\'\\\'he\\\'\\\' intentionally allowed it to happen.
No. No one is assuming that things would \\\"go differently\\\". The criticism is that the justification given in the story makes no sense. It doesn\\\'t matter if different actions would have had a different result or not -- the criticism is that the reasons \\\'\\\'established in the story\\\'\\\' make no sense.
No. No one is assuming that things would \\\"go differently\\\". The criticism is that the justification given in the story makes no sense. It doesn\\\'t matter if different actions would have had a different result or not -- the criticism is that the reasons \\\'\\\'established in the story\\\'\\\' make no sense.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Except that he was the one who caused himself to be put on drugs by refusing to heal. That\'s the entire point. He intentionally \'\'caused\'\' Flare to imprison him in the second loop by pretending he was too traumatized to heal in order to \
to:
Except that he was the one who caused himself to be put on drugs by refusing to heal. That\\\'s the entire point. He intentionally \\\'\\\'caused\\\'\\\' Flare to imprison him in the second loop by pretending he was too traumatized to heal in order to \\\"absorb abilities\\\", when it was already established that he can do that anyway.
No. No one is assuming that things would \\\"go differently\\\". The criticism is that the justification given in the story makes no sense. It doesn\\\'t matter if different actions would have had a different result or not -- the criticism is that the reasons \\\'\\\'established in the story\\\'\\\' make no sense.
No. No one is assuming that things would \\\"go differently\\\". The criticism is that the justification given in the story makes no sense. It doesn\\\'t matter if different actions would have had a different result or not -- the criticism is that the reasons \\\'\\\'established in the story\\\'\\\' make no sense.
