[001]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My post wasn\'t designed to debate the quality of the science (I think it should be clear from what I said that I agree that it\'s awful). Nor was my decision based on my personal anecdotal evidence; I\'ve only seen examples of how the fandom\'s been reacting since removing the post, not prior to it -- I always mention when I\'m influenced by personal anecdotes precisely because they\'re only anecdotes.
to:
My post wasn\\\'t designed to debate the quality of the science (I think it should be clear from what I said that I agree that it\\\'s awful). Nor was my decision based on my personal anecdotal evidence; I\\\'ve only seen examples of how the fandom\\\'s been reacting since removing the post, not prior to it -- I always mention when I\\\'m influenced by personal anecdotes precisely because they\\\'re only anecdotes. My comment wasn\\\'t in relation to why I removed the post, it was in relation to your assumption that everyone should know basic physics. Yes, anecdotal evidence isn\\\'t a winning argument, but I wasn\\\'t trying to make a winning argument with that observation.
