[005]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 0 from:
to:
^^ In fairness to Emerald Theorem, I have engaged with them about rewriting edits before, so we have negotiated over edits in the past.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across to me as complaining rather a genuine BBC entry originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I do think that it is salvageable. It just needs a rewrite.
to:
I do, however, think the original entry is complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across to me as complaining rather a genuine BBC entry originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I do think that it is salvageable. It just needs a rewrite. I suggested one rewrite above, but that was an example off the top of my head -- I\\\'m not expecting that to be the entry that gets used.
Ultimately, BBC comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\\\'m happy for that to be the end of it.
Ultimately, BBC comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\\\'m happy for that to be the end of it.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across as complaining to me originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I do think that it is salvageable. It just needs a rewrite.
to:
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\\\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\\\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across to me as complaining rather a genuine BBC entry originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I do think that it is salvageable. It just needs a rewrite.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across as complaining to me originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I did think that it was salvageable. It just needs a rewrite.
to:
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\\\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\\\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across as complaining to me originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I do think that it is salvageable. It just needs a rewrite.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it.
to:
Ultimately, it comes down to a consensus, and I will always go with the majority. So, if everyone does feel that the original entry has no problems, then I\\\'m happy for that to be the end of it. I do, however, think that\\\'s complaining too widely, and the real issue is lost in the middle of it. It did come across as complaining to me originally, which is why I removed it. However, after reading it again, I did think that it was salvageable. It just needs a rewrite.
