[001]
LostInFog
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
BUT: They funded their outstanding pro bono work by selling their skills and talents to the Dark Side, specifically huge real estate developers building suburban tracts, office buildings and shopping malls in areas that had been semi-rural, small towns surrounded by farmland. They did this by first polling to find out what lies (and yes, they were *lies*) people would believe, depending on how they\'re phrased and who said them. They then disseminated those lies in part by preparing sample letters-to-the-editor from \
to:
BUT: They funded their outstanding pro bono work by selling their skills and talents to the Dark Side, specifically huge real estate developers building suburban tracts, office buildings and shopping malls in areas that had been semi-rural, small towns surrounded by farmland. They did this by first polling to find out what lies (and yes, they were *lies*) people would believe, depending on how they\\\'re phrased and who said them. They then disseminated those lies in part by preparing sample letters-to-the-editor from \\\"concerned citizens\\\", often railing against the \\\"outside interests\\\" (e.g., environmentalists) who opposed the developments.
In the worst example, there was a town where the \\\"pro-growth\\\" message just wasn\\\'t taking hold; people really liked their small-town atmosphere. Sadly, what lie underneath that sentiment was xenophobia. There was one city council member who was solidly anti-development from a liberal angle, who was quite popular because of her anti-development stance. And then the town decided to ban \\\"cruising\\\", clearly aimed at the Mexican/Latino low-rider car culture. On the weekend before the ban was to take effect, the cruising folks organized one last party, which was met with cops in full riot gear hitting cars with their batons - which naturally led to a riot. Well, this city council member went out that night to see what was up, and described what happened as a police-provoked riot. This gave our Astro Turfers the ammunition they needed.
So they used all their tools - polling, letter-writing, phone calls, door-to-door canvassing, etc. - to build up a \\\"grass-roots\\\" campaign to defeat this city council member, focusing all attention not on her stance on development (for which she was popular) but against her opposition to anti-low-rider xenophobia (which the firm\\\'s client had no stake in). They won, she lost, and the development went through.
It is to my everlasting shame that I didn\\\'t find some way to leak this stuff to that city council member, or otherwise find some way to help her.
In the worst example, there was a town where the \\\"pro-growth\\\" message just wasn\\\'t taking hold; people really liked their small-town atmosphere. Sadly, what lie underneath that sentiment was xenophobia. There was one city council member who was solidly anti-development from a liberal angle, who was quite popular because of her anti-development stance. And then the town decided to ban \\\"cruising\\\", clearly aimed at the Mexican/Latino low-rider car culture. On the weekend before the ban was to take effect, the cruising folks organized one last party, which was met with cops in full riot gear hitting cars with their batons - which naturally led to a riot. Well, this city council member went out that night to see what was up, and described what happened as a police-provoked riot. This gave our Astro Turfers the ammunition they needed.
So they used all their tools - polling, letter-writing, phone calls, door-to-door canvassing, etc. - to build up a \\\"grass-roots\\\" campaign to defeat this city council member, focusing all attention not on her stance on development (for which she was popular) but against her opposition to anti-low-rider xenophobia (which the firm\\\'s client had no stake in). They won, she lost, and the development went through.
It is to my everlasting shame that I didn\\\'t find some way to leak this stuff to that city council member, or otherwise find some way to help her.
