Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / StreetFighterV

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\'ve only \
to:
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\\\'ve only \\\"reverted\\\" it once. In three years. Do you really think people remember something like this for \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' long?

I\\\'ve already said all that needs to be said. There is more to a character than pure statistics. And as I\\\'ve mentioned before, Abigail\\\'s armor starts up on frame 3 or later, which means he can\\\'t try to tank hits defensively. His armor is an offensive tool for pressure, not a defensive one, and trying to use it as such fails more often than it succeeds. Having few defensive tools and not having any true wakeup reversal options \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone worse on defense than someone else who \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' have those tools. That \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone a GlassCannon. Abigail has a strong offense and a weak defense. What do you call that?

Ultimately I dislike inviting a third party arbitration, due to the fact that a lay understanding would lead to missing the point that requires more in-depth understanding of the game. (Hence the explanation, which was further elaboration for anyone who didn\\\'t know the more advanced details of the game in question).

For example, why not ask an Abigail main on twitch or the SFV community, such as on Discord to weigh in with their opinions on whether or not Abigail has poor defenses.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\'ve only \
to:
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\\\'ve only \\\"reverted\\\" it once. In three years. Do you really think people remember something like this for \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' long?

I\\\'ve already said all that needs to be said. There is more to a character than pure statistics. And as I\\\'ve mentioned before, Abigail\\\'s armor starts up on frame 3 or later, which means he can\\\'t try to tank hits defensively. His armor is an offensive tool for pressure, not a defensive one, and trying to use it as such fails more often than it succeeds. Having few defensive tools and not having any true wakeup reversal options \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone worse on defense than someone else who \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' have those tools. That \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone a GlassCannon. Abigail has a strong offense and a weak defense. What do you call that?

Ultimately I dislike inviting a third party arbitration, due to the fact that a lay understanding would lead to missing the point that requires more in-depth understanding of the game.

For example, why not ask an Abigail main on twitch or the SFV community, such as on Discord to weigh in with their opinions on whether or not Abigail has poor defenses.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\'ve only \
to:
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\\\'ve only \\\"reverted\\\" it once. Calling that a \\\"Three year edit-war\\\" is completely unfair.

I\\\'ve already said all that needs to be said. There is more to a character than pure statistics. And as I\\\'ve mentioned before, Abigail\\\'s armor starts up on frame 3 or later, which means he can\\\'t try to tank hits defensively. His armor is an offensive tool for pressure, not a defensive one, and trying to use it as such fails more often than it succeeds. Having few defensive tools and not having any true wakeup reversal options \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone worse on defense than someone else who \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' have those tools. That \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone a GlassCannon. Abigail has a strong offense and a weak defense. What do you call that?

Ultimately I dislike inviting a third party arbitration, due to the fact that a lay understanding would lead to missing the point that requires more in-depth understanding of the game.

For example, why not ask an Abigail main on twitch or the SFV community, such as on Discord to weigh in with their opinions on whether or not Abigail has poor defenses.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\'ve only \
to:
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\\\'ve only \\\"reverted\\\" it once. Calling that a \\\"Three year edit-war\\\" is completely unfair.

I\\\'ve already said all that needs to be said. There is more to a character than pure statistics. And as I\\\'ve mentioned before, Abigail\\\'s armor starts up on frame 3 or later, which means he can\\\'t try to tank hits defensively. His armor is an offensive tool for pressure, not a defensive one, and trying to use it as such fails more often than it succeeds. Having few defensive tools and not having any true wakeup reversal options \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone worse on defense than someone else who \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' have those tools. That \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone a GlassCannon. Abigail has a strong offense and a weak defense. What do you call that?

Ultimately I dislike inviting a third party arbitration, due to the fact that a lay understanding would lead to missing the point that requires more in-depth understanding of the game.

For example, why not ask an Abigail main on twitch or the SFV community, such as on Discord to weigh in with their opinions on whether or not Abigail has poor defenses.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\'ve only \
to:
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\\\'ve only \\\"reverted\\\" it once. Calling that a \\\"Three year edit-war\\\" is completely unfair.

I\\\'ve already said all that needs to be said. There is more to a character than pure statistics. And as I\\\'ve mentioned before, Abigail\\\'s armor starts up on frame 3 or later, which means he can\\\'t try to tank hits defensively. His armor is an offensive tool for pressure, not a defensive one, and trying to use it as such fails more often than it succeeds. Having few defensive tools and not having any true wakeup reversal options \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone worse on defense than someone else who \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' have those tools. That \\\'\\\'does\\\'\\\' make someone a GlassCannon. Abigail has a strong offense and a weak defense. What do you call that?

Ultimately I dislike inviting a third party arbitration, due to the fact that a lay understanding would lead to missing the point that requires more in-depth understanding of the game.

For example, why not ask an Abigail main on twitch or the SFV community, such as on Discord to weigh in with their opinions on whether or not Abigail has poor defenses.

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith?
to:
Really, resorting to threats now? Is it seriously that much to ask for you to argue in good faith? Bring this to the Admins if you want. I\\\'ve only \\\"reverted\\\" it once.
Top