[005]
fishysaur
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"The truth is that the Cinder/Ruby conflict hasn\\\\\\\'t unfolded the way people wanted it to, hence the complaints.\\\"
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think they were badly done? For instance, I think none wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best volume because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t creat a situation when they were in the same room (Just to give an example. It\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think they were badly done? For instance, I think none wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best volume because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t creat a situation when they were in the same room (Just to give an example. It\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"The truth is that the Cinder/Ruby conflict hasn\\\\\\\'t unfolded the way people wanted it to, hence the complaints.\\\"
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best volume because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t creat a situation when they were in the same room (Just to give an example. It\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best volume because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t creat a situation when they were in the same room (Just to give an example. It\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"The truth is that the Cinder/Ruby conflict hasn\\\\\\\'t unfolded the way people wanted it to, hence the complaints.\\\"
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best volume because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t had a situation when they were in the same room (for instance. it\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best volume because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t had a situation when they were in the same room (for instance. it\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"The truth is that the Cinder/Ruby conflict hasn\\\\\\\'t unfolded the way people wanted it to, hence the complaints.\\\"
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t had a situation when they were in the same room (for instance. it\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t had a situation when they were in the same room (for instance. it\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
Seriously, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"The truth is that the Cinder/Ruby conflict hasn\\\\\\\'t unfolded the way people wanted it to, hence the complaints.\\\"
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t had a situation when they were in the same room (for instance. it\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
I find hilarious that, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
You should stop dismissing criticism with the \\\"it just didn\\\'t go the way they wanted\\\" excuse. Have you ever thought, if many people criticise certain elements, they do because they think it was done badly? For instance, I think noone wanted Penny or Phyrra to die in volume 3, but is considered by many the best because (the second half, at least) it was done well.
The problem is, in a nutshell, that after 2 volumes of having her revenge on Ruby as main (and the only shown one) motivation, Cinder suddenly throws it away for no reason the moment they are in the same room. If the writers simply didn\\\'t had a situation when they were in the same room (for instance. it\\\'s not something I wanted, just an idea out of many of how they could have easily avoided this bad writing), many less people would have complained
I find hilarious that, every time you try to give a logical explanation for why Cinder ignored Ruby, you give a different one.
