They're confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don't allow us to confirm whether they're friends, allies or antagonists.
to:
They\'re confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don\'t allow us to confirm whether they\'re friends, allies or antagonists.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Beyond that, you're correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
to:
Beyond that, you\'re correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It's an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we'd have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
to:
It\'s an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we\'d have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The reason I'm going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it's up and suggest rearrangements if they're needed, including what pages should (or shouldn't) exist. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person's head, but once it's on paper, it doesn't look so good. My plan for the sandbox was to default most of the characters to the Kingdoms page (partially to see how big that page gets) and then ask who needs to stay on that page and who needs to be moved to Friends/Allies or Antagonists.
to:
The reason I\'m going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it\'s up and suggest rearrangements if they\'re needed, including what pages should (or shouldn\'t) exist. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person\'s head, but once it\'s on paper, it doesn\'t look so good. My plan for the sandbox was to default most of the characters to the Kingdoms page (partially to see how big that page gets) and then ask who needs to stay on that page and who needs to be moved to Friends/Allies or Antagonists; the only ones I was going to start on the alignment pages are SSSN and CFVY on the Friends/Allies page and CRDL, the Club and SDC on the Antagonists page.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
For example, I envisage the Beacon teachers being on the Kingdoms page because they play mentor roles to the main characters. However, most people might want them on the Friends/Allies page instead... because they play mentor roles to the main characters.
to:
For example, I envisage the Beacon teachers being on the Kingdoms page because they play mentor roles to the main characters. However, most people might want them on the Friends/Allies page instead... because they play mentor roles to the main characters. By the same token, CRDL may not be eligible for the Antagonists page and people might feel they\'re better placed on the Kingdoms page.
They're confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don't allow us to confirm whether they're friends, allies or antagonists.
to:
They\'re confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don\'t allow us to confirm whether they\'re friends, allies or antagonists.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Beyond that, you're correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
to:
Beyond that, you\'re correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It's an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we'd have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
to:
It\'s an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we\'d have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The reason I'm going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it's up and suggest rearrangements if they're needed. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person's head, but once it's on paper, it doesn't look so good. My plan for the sandbox was to default most of the characters to the Kingdoms page (partially to see how big that page gets) and then ask who needs to stay on that page and who needs to be moved to Friends/Allies or Antagonists.
to:
The reason I\'m going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it\'s up and suggest rearrangements if they\'re needed, including what pages should (or shouldn\'t) exist. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person\'s head, but once it\'s on paper, it doesn\'t look so good. My plan for the sandbox was to default most of the characters to the Kingdoms page (partially to see how big that page gets) and then ask who needs to stay on that page and who needs to be moved to Friends/Allies or Antagonists.
They're confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don't allow us to confirm whether they're friends, allies or antagonists.
to:
They\'re confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don\'t allow us to confirm whether they\'re friends, allies or antagonists.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Beyond that, you're correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
to:
Beyond that, you\'re correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It's an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we'd have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
to:
It\'s an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we\'d have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The reason I'm going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it's up and suggest rearrangements if they're needed. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person's head, but once it's on paper, it doesn't look so good.
to:
The reason I\'m going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it\'s up and suggest rearrangements if they\'re needed. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person\'s head, but once it\'s on paper, it doesn\'t look so good. My plan for the sandbox was to default most of the characters to the Kingdoms page (partially to see how big that page gets) and then ask who needs to stay on that page and who needs to be moved to Friends/Allies or Antagonists.
For example, I envisage the Beacon teachers being on the Kingdoms page because they play mentor roles to the main characters. However, most people might want them on the Friends/Allies page instead... because they play mentor roles to the main characters.
They're confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don't allow us to confirm whether they're friends, allies or antagonists.
to:
They\'re confirmed friends/allies of the main characters. The Kingdoms page would be more for neutral characters, minor characters who may not be in it long enough to form relationships with the main characters of any alignment, or characters who have ambiguous roles in the storyline (such as Raven) that don\'t allow us to confirm whether they\'re friends, allies or antagonists.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Beyond that, you're correct. characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
to:
Beyond that, you\'re correct. Characters that are on either the Friends/Allies page or the Antagonists page would easily fit on the Kingdoms page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It's an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we'd have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
to:
It\'s an attempt to stop the Kingdoms page becoming too massive. As it is, we may end up finding ourselves needing to split the Kingdoms page, but at least we\'d have a clear split to create (Kingdom of Vale, Kingdom of Atlas, Menagerie, etc.).
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The reason I'm going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it's up and suggest rearrangements if they're needed. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person's head, but once it's on paper, it doesn't look so good.
to:
The reason I\'m going to do it in a sandbox first (aside from the sheer scale of the changes) is so that people can review it when it\'s up and suggest rearrangements if they\'re needed. Sometimes a thing sounds good inside a person\'s head, but once it\'s on paper, it doesn\'t look so good.
