Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / MassEffectAndromeda

Go To

[008] Emu0 Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be FauxSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be FauxSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which is almost definitely a theme and involved forced conversions). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be FauxSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be FauxSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be FauxSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.). Both have been AcceptableTargets for decades, so not implausible.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
And yeah, the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.

The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever, not like pseudo-Communist villains are rare in the media.), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism, which involved forced conversions). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could still be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
There's an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever), and the kett have a religious extremist vibe. Could be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn't so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism). And the entry's less rant-y than it used to be.
to:
There\'s an argument to be made for the Nazi parallels, (not 100% sure about communism, but whatever), and the kett have religious extremist trappings. Could be RuleOfSymbolism, but the fundamentalist angle isn\'t so hard to swallow (or, as another troper pointed out, colonialism). And the entry\'s less rant-y than it used to be.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The situation is about as stable as it's gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
to:
The situation is about as stable as it\'s gonna get. I vote for both sides leaving it be.
Top