Discussion History Analysis / AntiHero

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

%% \"[=UnscrupulousHero=]\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\"

'''[=UnscrupulousHero=]''': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

%% \"[=UnscrupulousHero=]\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\" \\\\

'''[=UnscrupulousHero=]''': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

%%% \"[=UnscrupulousHero=]\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\" \\\\
'''[=UnscrupulousHero=]''': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

@@%%\"UnscrupulousHero\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\"@@
@@\'\'\'UnscrupulousHero\'\'\': These are the darkest possible while…@@

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

@@%%\"UnscrupulousHero\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\"
@@\'\'\'UnscrupulousHero\'\'\': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

%% \"[=UnscrupulousHero=]\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\"
'''[=UnscrupulousHero=]''': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

%% \"[=UnscrupulousHero=]\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\"
\'\'\'[=UnscrupulousHero=]\'\'\': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?

I know I\'m very late to this dance, but... could we add the type numbers as *HTML comments* to this page, just for reference? My problem is, I\'m looking at a character page that says Tony Soprano is a \"Type IV-V\". I\'d love to replace that with the new trope names, but the trouble is, I\'m not 100% sure which is which.

I\'m going to assume that the tropes are in their old numerical order, but it would make things easier if the HTML said something like:

%% \"UnscrupulousHero\" was formerly known as \"Type IV\"
'''{=UnscrupulousHero=}''': These are the darkest possible while…

Any objection to my doing that?