Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / RWBY

Go To

[004] Wyldchyld Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Actually, most of the ones I'm removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
to:
Actually, most of the ones I\'m removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
That's the fan art that becomes
to:
That\'s the fan art that becomes \"hilarious in hindsight\" not the work itself. It\'s the fan art that came first and is made funny by Ren\'s similarity and the crew\'s confirmation they\'d seen the artwork, too.

I\'m not questioning whether the situation is funny, and I\'m not removing it on the grounds of whether or not I personally find it funny (in this case, I actually am in the \"find it funny\" camp of people). I just cannot see how the example is relevant to the work, given that it\'s the fan art that\'s affected by the trope here, not the work itself.

Issues like the seventh one are also not about whether or not people find it funny. It\'s about whether or not it classifies as \"hindsight\" given that it\'s an earlier event affecting a later event, which is the reverse of the trope.

Hopefully, that clarifies my thinking here.

On the zero context examples, I did intend to add them back as commented out tags for others who might have more information to rewrite, but I honestly forgot, so apologies for that particular issue.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Actually, most of the ones I'm removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
to:
Actually, most of the ones I\'m removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
That's the fan art that becomes
to:
That\'s the fan art that becomes \"hilarious in hindsight\" not the work itself. It\'s the fan art that came first and is made funny by Ren\'s similarity and the crew\'s confirmation they\'d seen the artwork, too.

I\'m not questioning whether the situation is funny, and I\'m not removing it on the grounds of whether or not I personally find it funny (in this case, I actually am in the \"find it funny\" camp of people). I just cannot see how the example is relevant to the work, given that it\'s the fan art that\'s affected by the trope here, not the work itself.

Issues like the seventh one are also not about whether or not people find it funny. It\'s about whether or not it classifies as \"hindsight\" given that it\'s an earlier event affecting a later event.

Hopefully, that clarifies my thinking here.

On the zero context examples, I did intend to add them back as commented out tags for others who might have more information to rewrite, but I honestly forgot, so apologies for that particular issue.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Actually, most of the ones I'm removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
to:
Actually, most of the ones I\'m removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
That's the fan art that becomes
to:
That\'s the fan art that becomes \"hilarious in hindsight\" not the work itself. It\'s the fan art that came first and is made funny by Ren\'s similarity and the crew\'s confirmation they\'d seen the artwork, too.

I\'m not questioning whether the situation is funny, and I\'m not removing it on the grounds of whether or not I personally find it funny (in this case, I actually am in the \"find it funny\" camp of people). I just cannot see how the example is relevant to the work, given that it\'s the fan art that\'s affected by the trope here, not the work itself.

Hopefully, that clarifies my thinking here.

On the zero context examples, I did intend to add them back as commented out tags for others who might have more information to rewrite, but I honestly forgot, so apologies for that particular issue.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Actually, most of the ones I'm removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
to:
Actually, most of the ones I\'m removing are based on things that are meta to the work - how is finding fan art funny relevant to the work YMMV page? For example, the first entry:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
That's the fan art that becomes
to:
That\'s the fan art that becomes \"hilarious in hindsight\" not the work itself. It\'s the fan art that came first and is made funny by Ren\'s similarity and the crew\'s confirmation they\'d seen the artwork, too.

I\'m not questioning whether the situation is funny, and I\'m not removing it on the grounds of whether or not I personally find it funny (in this case, I actually am in the \"find it funny\" camp of people). I just cannot see how the example is relevant to the work, given that it\'s the fan art that\'s affected by the trope here, not the work itself.

Hopefully, that clarifies my thinking here.
Top