[002]
MadCat221
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I thought the whole point of the WMG page was to state the wild guess and then have others add to or refute the feasibility, or note it as jossed or confirmed? Natter on pages with trope or example listings is one thing... This is the first time I ever have had a refutation on a WMG page deleted because of
to:
I thought the whole point of the WMG page was to state the wild guess and then have others add to or refute the feasibility, or note it as jossed or confirmed? Natter on pages with trope or example listings is one thing... This is the first time I ever have had a refutation on a WMG page deleted because of \"natter\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I thought the whole point of the WMG page was to state the wild guess and then have others add to or refute the feasibility, or note it as jossed or confirmed? Natter on pages with trope or example listings is one thing... This is the first time I ever have had a refutation on a WMG page deleted because of
to:
I thought the whole point of the WMG page was to state the wild guess and then have others add to or refute the feasibility, or note it as jossed or confirmed? Natter on pages with trope or example listings is one thing... This is the first time I ever have had a refutation on a WMG page deleted because of \"natter\".
That the drones are \"several years out of date\" means nothing: I saw no sign of them being mottled cyborgs like the Borg we already seen. I do not believe they are Borg.
I believe the deletion of my comments was because the OPer did not like the hypothesis being refuted and is hiding behind the claim of \"natter\" for deleting it, despite such discussion being the *whole point* of the WMG page. I also believe \"Take it to discussion\" is a handy way of making this disappear.
Furthermore, if a refutation is considered \"natter\", then I postulate that all the silly slashficcy stuff and \'verse crossover stuff in WMGs should be considered natter as well, and should be outright deleted.
That the drones are \"several years out of date\" means nothing: I saw no sign of them being mottled cyborgs like the Borg we already seen. I do not believe they are Borg.
I believe the deletion of my comments was because the OPer did not like the hypothesis being refuted and is hiding behind the claim of \"natter\" for deleting it, despite such discussion being the *whole point* of the WMG page. I also believe \"Take it to discussion\" is a handy way of making this disappear.
Furthermore, if a refutation is considered \"natter\", then I postulate that all the silly slashficcy stuff and \'verse crossover stuff in WMGs should be considered natter as well, and should be outright deleted.
