Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rewrite approved by the thread
.
.Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, get himself acquitted and be immune against further prosecution, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and get away with it all. Until the last two minutes of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. He was acquitted of attempting to murder her, and thus he couldn't be convicted of murder later by withdrawing her from life support-which is perfectly legal for him to do, since he was her next of kin.
to:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette Theodore "Ted" Crawford hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, get himself acquitted and be immune against further prosecution, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and nearly get away with it all. Until all of it. Crawford delights in playing mind games with the last two minutes young hero Will Beachum, allowing Beachum to know he's guilty, but constantly dancing out of trouble via his own clever schemes until the end of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. He was acquitted of attempting film. Despite being a murderer, Crawford manages to murder her, retain his charm and thus he couldn't be convicted even a measure of murder later by withdrawing her from life support-which is perfectly legal for him to do, since he was her next of kin.sympathy, even handling his defeat with grace.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, have his charges acquitted and be immune against further trial, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and get away with it all. Until the last two minutes of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. He was acquitted of attempted to murder her, and thus he couldn't be convicted of murder later by withdrawing her from life support-which is perfectly legal for him to do, since he was her next of kin.
to:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, have his charges get himself acquitted and be immune against further trial, prosecution, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and get away with it all. Until the last two minutes of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. He was acquitted of attempted attempting to murder her, and thus he couldn't be convicted of murder later by withdrawing her from life support-which is perfectly legal for him to do, since he was her next of kin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, have his charges acquitted and be immune against further trial, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and get away with it all. Until the last two minutes of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. The evidence was obtained illegally, and he wasn't technically the one who killed her. The doctors did that, and if her death was ruled a murder, then it would mean that any and all doctors who have ever invoked a patient's "right to death" rights would have to be dragged in on counts of murder.
to:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, have his charges acquitted and be immune against further trial, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and get away with it all. Until the last two minutes of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. The evidence He was obtained illegally, acquitted of attempted to murder her, and thus he wasn't technically the one who killed her. The doctors did that, and if couldn't be convicted of murder later by withdrawing her death from life support-which is perfectly legal for him to do, since he was ruled a murder, then it would mean that any and all doctors who have ever invoked a patient's "right to death" rights would have to be dragged in on counts her next of murder.kin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MagnificentBastard: Creator/AnthonyHopkins' character with a bit of GambitRoulette hatches a plan that allows him to shoot his cheating wife, hide the murder weapon, confess to his crime, have his charges acquitted and be immune against further trial, cause the suicide of the man sleeping with his wife, pull the plug on his comatose wife, and get away with it all. Until the last two minutes of the film anyway... which in all honesty, wouldn't get him behind bars. The evidence was obtained illegally, and he wasn't technically the one who killed her. The doctors did that, and if her death was ruled a murder, then it would mean that any and all doctors who have ever invoked a patient's "right to death" rights would have to be dragged in on counts of murder.
----
----
