Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / TheLastShip

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Season 4 ends up back in Europe where they are trying to cure a plant mutation of the disease. Season 5 is set in the Caribbean, with a Venezuelan BigBad who attacks the USA with a cyber attack & air bombing.


Added DiffLines:

** The Season 4 bad guy Doctor Velik was actually trying to use the cure to turn humans into pacifists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The new bad guys in Europe are [[ThoseWackyNazis Nazis]], or [[ANaziByAnyOtherName something similar to it]]. Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but it sounds like they're trying to create a new Master Race, rebuilding the world in their own image.

Changed: 169

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', ''Hayward'' and ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. That means there are around thirty-nine additional ''Arleigh Burkes'' in existence in the ''Last Ship'' compared to real life, to say nothing of the additional ''Burkes'' that would exist between the three aforementioned.

to:

*** First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', ''Hayward'' and ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, 150 (DDG-151, DDG-157 and DDG-162 respectively), whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. DDG-115. That means there are around thirty-nine at least ''forty-seven'' additional ''Arleigh Burkes'' in existence in the ''Last Ship'' compared to real life, to say nothing of the additional ''Burkes'' that would exist between the three aforementioned.life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Second, it should be noted that the Flight III ''Arleigh Burkes'' are scheduled to start at DDG-124, yet the ''James'' and her sisters are all clearly Flight IIAs.

to:

*** Second, it should be noted that the Flight III ''Arleigh Burkes'' are scheduled to start at DDG-124, yet the ''James'' and her sisters are all clearly Flight IIAs.[=IIA=]s.

Changed: 48

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'', the class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse have caused their nuclear reactors to ''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.

to:

*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'', the class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse have caused their nuclear reactors to ''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, where it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.

Changed: 123

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which has remained in service throughout), the class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse have caused their nuclear reactors to ''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.

to:

*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which has remained in service throughout), Velikiy'', the class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse have caused their nuclear reactors to ''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which has remained in service throughout), the class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse have caused their nuclear reactors to ''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, ''it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.

to:

*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which has remained in service throughout), the class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse have caused their nuclear reactors to ''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, ''it's it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which has remained in service throughout), the ''Kirov''-class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse ''have caused their nuclear reactors to degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, ''it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.

to:

*** And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which has remained in service throughout), the ''Kirov''-class class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of disuse ''have have caused their nuclear reactors to degrade''.''degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, ''it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Third and further on is the case of the ''Achilles'', which was supposed to have been built around the same time as HMS ''Ajax'' (the seventh and otherwise final member of the class). In real life, only the third ''Astute''-class boat, HMS ''Artful'', has been launched by 2014 while the forth, HMS ''Audacious'', isn't scheduled to be commissioned until 2018.

to:

*** Third and further on is the case of the ''Achilles'', which was supposed to have been built around the same time as HMS ''Ajax'' (the seventh and otherwise final member of the class). In real life, only the third ''Astute''-class boat, HMS ''Artful'', has been launched by 2014 while the forth, fourth, HMS ''Audacious'', isn't scheduled to be commissioned until 2018.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', the ''Hayward'' and the ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. That means there are around thirty-nine additional ''Arleigh Burkes'' in existence in the ''Last Ship'' compared to real life, to say nothing of the additional ''Burkes'' that would exist between the three aforementioned.

to:

*** First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', the ''Hayward'' and the ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. That means there are around thirty-nine additional ''Arleigh Burkes'' in existence in the ''Last Ship'' compared to real life, to say nothing of the additional ''Burkes'' that would exist between the three aforementioned.

Added: 1811

Changed: 1223

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On the other hand, one can argue that the show is already deep within AnachronismStew for a number of reasons. First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', the ''Hayward'' and the ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. Second, it should be noted that the Flight III ''Arleigh Burkes'' are scheduled to start at DDG-124, yet the ''James'' and her sisters are all clearly Flight IIAs. Third and further on is the case of the ''Achilles'', which was supposed to have been built around the same time as HMS ''Ajax'' (the seventh and otherwise final member of the class). In real life, only the third ''Astute''-class boat, HMS ''Artful'', has been launched by 2014 while the forth, HMS ''Audacious'', isn't scheduled to be commissioned until 2018. And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser'' and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which is still in service), the first batch of ''Kirovs'' Overall, technical accuracy seems to be of the least concern with the writers

to:

** On the other hand, one can argue that the show is already deep within AnachronismStew for a number of reasons.
***
First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', the ''Hayward'' and the ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. That means there are around thirty-nine additional ''Arleigh Burkes'' in existence in the ''Last Ship'' compared to real life, to say nothing of the additional ''Burkes'' that would exist between the three aforementioned.
***
Second, it should be noted that the Flight III ''Arleigh Burkes'' are scheduled to start at DDG-124, yet the ''James'' and her sisters are all clearly Flight IIAs. IIAs.
***
Third and further on is the case of the ''Achilles'', which was supposed to have been built around the same time as HMS ''Ajax'' (the seventh and otherwise final member of the class). In real life, only the third ''Astute''-class boat, HMS ''Artful'', has been launched by 2014 while the forth, HMS ''Audacious'', isn't scheduled to be commissioned until 2018.
***
And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style style" ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser'' battlecruiser and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which is still has remained in service), service throughout), the first batch ''Kirov''-class remains "in reserve" (read left to rot in their ports) because years of ''Kirovs'' Overall, disuse ''have caused their nuclear reactors to degrade''. To the point where, much like certain surviving Soviet submarines, ''it's too dangerous to recommission, modernize ''or'' scrap them.
*** All that said,
technical accuracy seems to be of the least concern with the writersshow writers, and an unlikely factor on whether the ''Zumwalt'' will appear or not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On the other hand, one can argue that the show is already deep within AnachronismStew for a number of reasons. First is the fact the ''Nathan James'', the ''Hayward'' and the ''Shackleton'' all had hull numbers past 150, whereas the latest ''Arleigh Burke'', the ''Rafael Peralta'', is only DDG-112. Second, it should be noted that the Flight III ''Arleigh Burkes'' are scheduled to start at DDG-124, yet the ''James'' and her sisters are all clearly Flight IIAs. Third and further on is the case of the ''Achilles'', which was supposed to have been built around the same time as HMS ''Ajax'' (the seventh and otherwise final member of the class). In real life, only the third ''Astute''-class boat, HMS ''Artful'', has been launched by 2014 while the forth, HMS ''Audacious'', isn't scheduled to be commissioned until 2018. And finally, there's the ''Vrenya'', which is designated an "older style ''Kirov''-class battlecruiser'' and having been originally mothballed alongside the ''Admiral Ushakov'', ''Admiral Lazarev'' and ''Admiral Nakhimov'' during the 90s. If that's the case, then Rushkov was even more insane than he was presented, as outside the youngest ''Kirov'', the ''Pyotr Velikiy'' (which is still in service), the first batch of ''Kirovs'' Overall, technical accuracy seems to be of the least concern with the writers
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Documents in the show suggest that the in-verse year is 2014; as well it is probably Jossed given the serious economic straits the post-plague USA is in. Rebuilding just the existing class of ships may be a pipe dream for many years to come.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Now that S3 has basically wrapped up all the threads left by the Asia arc, there is Europe to look back to, as well as a shaky rebuilding of the USA now that the regional leaders' coup has been put down. The next two seasons will thus focus on the remnants of the Immune cult and the instability in Asia caused by the power vacuum left due to Peng's death. Also, what's going on in Africa and South America? The series still has some worldbuilding left to do.

to:

* Now that S3 has basically wrapped up all the threads left by the Asia arc, there is Europe to look back to, as well as a shaky rebuilding of the USA now that the regional leaders' coup has been put down. The next two seasons will thus focus on the remnants of the Immune cult and the instability in Asia caused by the power vacuum left due to Peng's death. Also, what's going on in Africa and South America? The series still has some worldbuilding left to do. It may be that another imminent threat to world peace could come from those quarters; Peng has already demonstrated the effectiveness of biological warfare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Seasons 4 and 5]]
* Now that S3 has basically wrapped up all the threads left by the Asia arc, there is Europe to look back to, as well as a shaky rebuilding of the USA now that the regional leaders' coup has been put down. The next two seasons will thus focus on the remnants of the Immune cult and the instability in Asia caused by the power vacuum left due to Peng's death. Also, what's going on in Africa and South America? The series still has some worldbuilding left to do.

Top