Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 56 (click to see context) from:
*** Of course he survived. How could he have shown up in Blade Runner 2049 if he died earlier in ''Drive''?
to:
*** Of course he survived. How could he have shown up in Blade ''Blade Runner 2049 2049'' if he died earlier in ''Drive''?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 56 (click to see context) from:
*** Of course he survived. How else would he have been able to show up in Blade Runner 2049?
to:
*** Of course he survived. How else would could he have been able to show shown up in Blade Runner 2049? 2049 if he died earlier in ''Drive''?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Of course he survived. How else would he have been able to show up in Blade Runner 2049?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!K is Charlie Brown
* He is constantly depressed, wants to be special, can't win and feels alone - despite all the women obviously attracted to him - simply because is too obsessed with his dream girl. Charlie Brown had his badass moments, so it's possible that he could be considered good enough as Blade Runner's replicant "template".
* He is constantly depressed, wants to be special, can't win and feels alone - despite all the women obviously attracted to him - simply because is too obsessed with his dream girl. Charlie Brown had his badass moments, so it's possible that he could be considered good enough as Blade Runner's replicant "template".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
I mean come on! The cold vacant inhuman Film/{{Drive}} stares of Ryan Gosling? You telling me they didn't cast him precisely because we'd all think this?
to:
I mean come on! The cold vacant inhuman Film/{{Drive}} Film/Drive2011 stares of Ryan Gosling? You telling me they didn't cast him precisely because we'd all think this?
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
* He did it in Film/{{Drive}}!
to:
* He did it in Film/{{Drive}}!Film/Drive2011!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[BittersweetEnding Or did he?]] You know, since we don't know if he survived or died in ''Drive'' either?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53,54 (click to see context) from:
!K lives
* After the credits roll, he [[Film/{{Drive}} blinks and gets back up.]]
* After the credits roll, he [[Film/{{Drive}} blinks and gets back up.]]
to:
!K lives
survives his wounds
*After the credits roll, he [[Film/{{Drive}} blinks and gets back up.]]He did it in Film/{{Drive}}!
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!K lives
*After the credits roll, he [[Film/{{Drive}} blinks and gets back up.]]
*After the credits roll, he [[Film/{{Drive}} blinks and gets back up.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* 2049 actually plays with that, Wallace claims that Deckard is a replicant designed by Tyrell to fall in love with Rachel. Of course, in context that could very well be a mindjob Wallace is trying to pull on Deckard, but it is there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
** That's actually a strong possibility, that Tyrell in his old age regretted dooming his precious creating to a brutal short life of slavery, and was planning in secret to change things up for them.
to:
* It would be kinda tragic that by killing Tyrell, Roy unknowingly screwed up the one good chance the Replicants had.
