Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Snowpiercer

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** '''Yes''', because it makes no sense to keep them around in the context of the story and it seems to exist solely feed into an extremely childish, simplistic, and reductive "The rich harm the poor simply because they're evil and they like to" narrative.

to:

*** '''Yes''', because it makes no sense to keep them around in the context of the story and it seems to exist solely to feed into an extremely childish, simplistic, and reductive "The rich harm the poor simply because they're evil and they like to" narrative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** '''Yes''', because it makes no sense to keep them around in the context of the story and seems to exist solely feed into an extremely childish and reductive "The rich harm the poor simply because they're evil and they like to" narrative.

to:

*** '''Yes''', because it makes no sense to keep them around in the context of the story and it seems to exist solely feed into an extremely childish childish, simplistic, and reductive "The rich harm the poor simply because they're evil and they like to" narrative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** '''Yes''', because it makes no sense to keep them around in the context of the story and seems to exist solely feed into an extremely childish and reductive "The rich harm the poor simply because they're evil and they like to" narrative.

Top