Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / DoctorWhoS34E5TimeHeist

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why is Abslom Daak's profile a drawing and not a photograph (in-universe)? Because no-one's gotten close enough to take one and live.

to:

* Why is Abslom Daak's profile a drawing and not a photograph (in-universe)? photograph? Because no-one's gotten close enough to take one and live.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Why is Abslom Daak's profile a drawing and not a photograph (in-universe)? Because no-one's gotten close enough to take one and live.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Except the Architect's message never stated that there was a reward coming if they successfully robbed the bank, only that bank security had been alerted and was closing in on them, leaving them no choice but to follow through on the plan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Except the Architect's message never stated that there was a reward coming if they successfully robbed the bank, only that bank security had been alerted and was closing in on them.

to:

** Except the Architect's message never stated that there was a reward coming if they successfully robbed the bank, only that bank security had been alerted and was closing in on them.them, leaving them no choice but to follow through on the plan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Except the Architect's message never stated that there was a reward coming if they successfully robbed the bank, only that bank security had been alerted and was closing in on them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The fact that Madame Karabraxos assigns her own clones to run her bank branches makes more sense if you consider that the bank's security screening is largely based on DNA identity-verification. Her clones have the same genetic pattern as she does, so by exclusively using such copies as managers she can keep the number of genotypes that can bypass high-level security measures to an absolute minimum of one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Presumably the Teller is discerning enough to distinguish the run-of-the-mill "background level" of guilt that ''any'' empath can probably pick up on in a crowd from the more directed, immediate, and active culpability of someone who's about to rob the place. Possibly it might misfire if, say, the enraged spouse of one of the guards were to turn up with the intention of stabbing the two-timing cheat, but it's doubtful if Ms. Delphox would give a damn about such collateral damage.

to:

*** Presumably the Teller is discerning enough to distinguish the run-of-the-mill "background level" of guilt that ''any'' empath can probably pick up on in a crowd from the more directed, immediate, and active culpability of someone who's about to rob the place. Possibly it might misfire if, say, the enraged spouse of one of the guards were to turn up at the bank with the intention of stabbing the two-timing cheat, but it's doubtful if Ms. Delphox would give a damn about such collateral damage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Considering how the Teller was diverted by Psi's data-binge of ''other'' criminals' police records, it seems like it focuses more on self-awareness of felonious intent - i.e. "guilt" in the legal sense - rather than just "feeling guilty". After all, Psi was feeling ''proud'' of his HeroicSacrifice at the time, not guilty about it.

to:

*** Considering how the Teller was diverted by Psi's data-binge of ''other'' criminals' police records, it seems like it focuses more on self-awareness of felonious intent - i.e. "guilt" in the legal sense - rather than just "feeling guilty". After all, Psi wouldn't and ''couldn't'' have felt legitimately guilty over other peoples' crimes: if anything, he was feeling ''proud'' of his HeroicSacrifice at the time, not guilty about it.on another's behalf.

Added: 337

Changed: 33

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Presumably the Teller is discerning enough to distinguish the run-of-the-mill "background level" of guilt that ''any'' empath can probably pick up on in a crowd from the more directed, immediate, and active culpability of someone who's about to rob the place. Possibly it might misfire if, say, the enraged spouse of one of the guards were to turn up with the intention of stabbing the two-timing cheat, but it's doubtful if Ms. Delphox would care about that.
** And even disregarding that - there still are psychopaths, who don't feel any guilt. BlueAndOrangeMorality adherents and {{Just Like Robin Hood}}s may well think robbing a bank is a good thing. They would, provided with the right tools, be able to just waltz in and out, take all valuables and leave a can of alphabet soup, just for the delicious {{Pun}}.

to:

*** Presumably the Teller is discerning enough to distinguish the run-of-the-mill "background level" of guilt that ''any'' empath can probably pick up on in a crowd from the more directed, immediate, and active culpability of someone who's about to rob the place. Possibly it might misfire if, say, the enraged spouse of one of the guards were to turn up with the intention of stabbing the two-timing cheat, but it's doubtful if Ms. Delphox would care give a damn about that.
such collateral damage.
** And even disregarding that - there still are psychopaths, who don't feel any guilt. BlueAndOrangeMorality adherents and {{Just Like Robin Hood}}s may well think robbing a bank is a good thing. They would, provided with the right tools, be able to just waltz in and out, take all valuables and leave a can of alphabet soup, just for the delicious {{Pun}}.{{Pun}}.
*** Considering how the Teller was diverted by Psi's data-binge of ''other'' criminals' police records, it seems like it focuses more on self-awareness of felonious intent - i.e. "guilt" in the legal sense - rather than just "feeling guilty". After all, Psi was feeling ''proud'' of his HeroicSacrifice at the time, not guilty about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Presumably the Teller is discerning enough to distinguish the run-of-the-mill "background level" of guilt that ''any'' empath can probably pick up on in a crowd from the more directed, immediate, and active culpability of someone who's about to rob the place. Possibly it might misfire if, say, the enraged spouse of one of the guards were to turn up with the intention of stabbing the two-timing cheat, but it's doubtful if Ms. Delphox would care about that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Extra ManipulativeBastard points for the Architect, when you realize that the path the Doctor's team took into the tunnels was probably ''intended'' to lead them past the cells where the Bank's brain-souped would-be robbers were kept. If the four of them hadn't seen what a nasty fate awaited them if captured, they might have hesitated to use the Shredders and [[spoiler: not been safely teleported into orbit]].

to:

* Extra ManipulativeBastard points for the Architect, when you realize that the path the Doctor's team took into the tunnels was probably ''intended'' to lead them past the cells where the Bank's brain-souped would-be robbers were kept. If the four of them hadn't seen what a nasty fate awaited them if captured, they might have hesitated to use the Shredders and [[spoiler: not been safely teleported into orbit]].orbit]].

!!!FridgeHorror:
* The Teller picks up feelings of guilt. Okay. But how about...
** Guilt that's unrelated to bank robbery? E.g. about cheating on your oblivious spouse, or having a screaming match with your child earlier that morning, or an IDidWhatIHadToDo moment in your DarkAndTroubledPast? Or even breaking your diet? How much guilt does it have to be? And is it specific? Just how telepathic the Teller is, exactly? If all it actually picks up is fear (of being caught), doesn't it have lots of false positives? Not necessarily among people who've done heinous things, just those who suffer from anxiety or guilt complex.
** And even disregarding that - there still are psychopaths, who don't feel any guilt. BlueAndOrangeMorality adherents and {{Just Like Robin Hood}}s may well think robbing a bank is a good thing. They would, provided with the right tools, be able to just waltz in and out, take all valuables and leave a can of alphabet soup, just for the delicious {{Pun}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Which makes the Doctor's little speech about imagining the thing you want most in the world a bit of a NiceJobBreakingItHero, because up until then, the Teller might not have detected them in the tunnels so easily! After, Psi and Saibra actually ''wanted'' to rob the vault to obtain their respective desires.

to:

** Which makes the Doctor's little speech about imagining the thing you want most in the world a bit of a NiceJobBreakingItHero, because up until then, the Teller might not have detected them in the tunnels so easily! After, Psi and Saibra actually ''wanted'' to rob the vault to obtain their respective desires.desires.
* Extra ManipulativeBastard points for the Architect, when you realize that the path the Doctor's team took into the tunnels was probably ''intended'' to lead them past the cells where the Bank's brain-souped would-be robbers were kept. If the four of them hadn't seen what a nasty fate awaited them if captured, they might have hesitated to use the Shredders and [[spoiler: not been safely teleported into orbit]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When the Teller makes his first appearance, the Doctor's team of would-be robbers are ''right there'', yet the creature doesn't sense enough guilt from them to pick them out of the crowd along with the unlucky man who got his forebrain soup-ified. The Doctor attributes this to them all successfully ''not'' thinking about their own plans to steal from the Bank, but considering Psi outright ''complains'' about how hard that is to do, it's difficult to accept that excuse. [[spoiler: It also can't be that the Teller sensed their mission's ''real'' purpose at the time, and deliberately let them pass, because it had to dig deep down into the Doctor's mind at the end to discover that they'd come to free its mate.]] Rather, the reason the Teller didn't sense any intention to rob the Bank from the four of them is because they didn't ''want'' to rob the place at all: they ''wanted'' to get out of their situation alive, and were playing along with the Architect's plans merely for survival's sake. Wanting to stay alive isn't something people need to feel guilty about, and their wish that they hadn't been roped into robbing the Bank in the first place far outweighed any desire to succeed at the theft.

to:

* When the Teller makes his first appearance, the Doctor's team of would-be robbers are ''right there'', yet the creature doesn't sense enough guilt from them to pick them out of the crowd along with the unlucky man who got his forebrain soup-ified. The Doctor attributes this to them all successfully ''not'' thinking about their own plans to steal from the Bank, but considering Psi outright ''complains'' about how hard that is to do, it's difficult to accept that excuse. [[spoiler: It also can't be that the Teller sensed their mission's ''real'' purpose at the time, and deliberately let them pass, because it had to dig deep down into the Doctor's mind at the end to discover that they'd come to free its mate.]] Rather, the reason the Teller didn't sense any intention to rob the Bank from the four of them is because they didn't ''want'' to rob the place at all: they ''wanted'' to get out of their situation alive, and were playing along with the Architect's plans merely for survival's sake. Wanting to stay alive isn't something people need to feel guilty about, and their wish that they hadn't been roped into robbing the Bank in the first place far outweighed any desire to succeed at the theft.theft.
** Which makes the Doctor's little speech about imagining the thing you want most in the world a bit of a NiceJobBreakingItHero, because up until then, the Teller might not have detected them in the tunnels so easily! After, Psi and Saibra actually ''wanted'' to rob the vault to obtain their respective desires.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!!FridgeBrilliance:

* When the Teller makes his first appearance, the Doctor's team of would-be robbers are ''right there'', yet the creature doesn't sense enough guilt from them to pick them out of the crowd along with the unlucky man who got his forebrain soup-ified. The Doctor attributes this to them all successfully ''not'' thinking about their own plans to steal from the Bank, but considering Psi outright ''complains'' about how hard that is to do, it's difficult to accept that excuse. [[spoiler: It also can't be that the Teller sensed their mission's ''real'' purpose at the time, and deliberately let them pass, because it had to dig deep down into the Doctor's mind at the end to discover that they'd come to free its mate.]] Rather, the reason the Teller didn't sense any intention to rob the Bank from the four of them is because they didn't ''want'' to rob the place at all: they ''wanted'' to get out of their situation alive, and were playing along with the Architect's plans merely for survival's sake. Wanting to stay alive isn't something people need to feel guilty about, and their wish that they hadn't been roped into robbing the Bank in the first place far outweighed any desire to succeed at the theft.

Top