Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / WhamLine

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 12:35:12 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Misuse and Overuse, started by MrDeath on Jun 20th 2011 at 7:44:38 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 9:55:50 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Needs Help, started by Wuz on Mar 25th 2016 at 3:45:47 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 9:15:33 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Needs Help, started by captainpat on Jun 21st 2016 at 4:44:12 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Trialman Since: Jul, 2011
Aug 14th 2019 at 9:29:43 AM •••

Have to say, I don’t think the Hunch of Notre Dame clip in the video examples fits the trope. The trope is mentioned as strictly an audience trope, so Frollo revealing he killed Quasimodo’s mother doesn’t fit, since the audience already knew that he did, it was shown back at the start of the movie.

Mort08 Pirate AND writer! Since: Feb, 2011
Pirate AND writer!
Aug 10th 2011 at 7:11:59 PM •••

Quick question: would something count as a Wham Line if the surprise has to do with who is saying the line, rather than the line itself? And if not, what is the trope for that?

Looking for some stories? Hide / Show Replies
DynamicDragon Since: Oct, 2011
Protar Since: Jan, 2013
Mar 11th 2013 at 3:58:56 AM •••

The reason given on the No Real Life Examples Please page is simply that "real life isn't scripted. Which is a stupid reason if you asked me, because there can still be shocking lines and events without scripting.

Edited by Protar
searcher8 Since: Dec, 2012
Mar 23rd 2013 at 10:36:24 AM •••

I agree, we really need to bring back the real life section. One of my favorite things about this site is reading how the various tropes can be found throughout history.

NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Dec 28th 2016 at 2:11:08 PM •••

Uhhh... how exacly can this trope aply to Real Life? I mean the Wham Line is supposed to shock the audience and Real Life doesn't have it unless you cound God (and what God would allow himself to be shocked anyway?) or we're watched by the aliens or something. The second case would fail Examples Are Not Arguable anyways. If it only shocks other characters, rather than the audience it's Dropping the Bombshell

Edited by NNinja
Pyrarson Everybody's dead, Dave. Since: Nov, 2013
Everybody's dead, Dave.
Jun 2nd 2015 at 11:21:09 PM •••

Does anybody know what the exact opposite of a wham line is?

H.B. Ward Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jun 2nd 2015 at 11:38:15 PM •••

Not sure it is even a thing.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
zoop Since: Aug, 2014
Sep 22nd 2014 at 8:31:14 PM •••

All of the examples are just the line itself, with no context. None of them make any sense.

Is this deliberate?

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Sep 22nd 2014 at 11:43:08 PM •••

It comes off to me as if this page got a bad example writing style that got perpetuated through imitation. I would recommend it for the trope repair shop.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Gavitro Since: Dec, 2012
Apr 12th 2014 at 5:50:38 PM •••

Should spoilers remain on the example pages? Some, like the Animated Film folder, have their spoilers removed. But others, such as the Video Games folder, still retain their spoilers.

majohe Since: Sep, 2010
Sep 15th 2013 at 12:24:50 PM •••

What happened to Wham Line for Professional Wrestling?

sparkykandy Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 7th 2013 at 9:55:10 PM •••

Is this considered a Wham Line? (The line in question is from the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon.) ""Working good. Erase Connors. Connors no more. Lizard forever!" The problem is though, we have Spidey questioning why the machine isn't working before this line happens, so I don't know if that invalidates it or not.

Edited by 216.99.32.42
kufat Since: Jul, 2010
Aug 20th 2013 at 6:33:47 AM •••

"If there is Foreshadowing, the line is the result of events or conversations that are clearly shown on screen, or it's a Foregone Conclusion, then it is not a Wham Line. The line itself has to be completely unexpected."

If we want to eliminate every line that's foreshadowed, about half of the examples will have to go.

AFP Since: Mar, 2010
Jul 2nd 2013 at 5:46:30 AM •••

Oh geez, I just realized, Wham Line and Punch Line are sibling tropes. A Punchline is just a Wham Line in a comedy routine.

Camacan MOD Since: Jan, 2001
May 6th 2011 at 5:17:13 AM •••

Dropping the quote to discussion — it does not seem to encapsulate the trope, just "kinda-sorta related".

Ground control to Major Tom.
Your circuit's dead. There's something wrong.
David Bowie, "Space Oddity"

Edited by Camacan
voodoochild Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 13th 2011 at 4:13:23 PM •••

Maybe this has been answered before, but I haven't found an answer: Why exactly does "you know there's no such thing as stars?" from Doctor Who's "The Big Bang" not count as a Wham Line? Yes, we already know there are no stars from the shot of the sky outside Amelia's window, but the fact that no one believes in them and that they never existed is, I would argue, a Wham Line moment.

Hide / Show Replies
ShayGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 13th 2011 at 6:54:21 PM •••

Firstly, the viewer is still piecing together the results of "The Pandorica Opens," in which the TARDIS's explosion caused every star to have no longer existed. The absence of stars fits in with that, especially since we already saw the scene of Amelia praying (sans Doctor this time), demonstrating, "Yes, Earth exists in this episode, but it's an altered timeline." This was the second thing we knew about the micro-universe of "The Big Bang," the first being "no stars."

Second, and more important, is the dialogue leading up to the line in question:

Christine: (in the tone of an honest question, not a prompt) "It's a lovely painting, Amelia, but what are all these?"
Amelia: "Stars."
Sharon: (huffing in an oh-not-this-nonsense-again manner) "Amelia..."
Christine: "Tell you what, shall we go outside?" (they do) "What do you see, Amelia?"
Amelia: "The moon."
Christine: "And what else?"
Amelia: "Just the dark."
Christine: "But no stars. If there were stars up there, we'd be able to see them, wouldn't we? ...Amelia, look at me. You know this is all just a story, don't you? You know there's no such thing as stars."

There's nothing special about those last two sentences except in that they serve as a memorable capstone to the rest. The rest of the scene — two adults not recognizing stars in a painting, an adult expressing exasperation at a child's mention of stars, and the rational adult demonstrating their absence — establishes all the relevant details: On this Earth, as you might expect from the end of the previous episode, "stars" are regarded as no more than something a kid made up, like (appropriately enough) an imaginary friend. (The mention of "star cults" a minute later notwithstanding.)

The end of that exchange doesn't remotely fit the definition. It's not a sucker punch at all. It's nothing like the Haruhi Suzumiya, Code Geass, or Narbonic examples. It's the same sort of thing as "I am Godzilla" (see above). Where's the case for it being a Wham Line?

Edited by ShayGuy
ShayGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 11th 2010 at 8:50:12 PM •••

Here's an example of a powerful, memorable line that accompanies a major revelation (namely, that the one who created The Plague for the Friend was Kiriko), but is not one of these. It's from Twentieth Century Boys volume 11: "I am Godzilla. I trampled 150,000 people to death." The entire chapter builds up to it, and the protagonist (along with most of the audience) realizes it several pages earlier — she'd been looking for pieces of the puzzle, and realized then what picture was forming. The next few pages are her desperately trying to find evidence that it isn't true; the aforementioned line is just confirmation that it is.

This concludes my rambling for the evening.

piearty Hello world! Since: Oct, 2009
Hello world!
Nov 28th 2010 at 2:18:18 AM •••

I don't think the Toy Story 3 line counts as a wham line, I mean, I thought that Lotso said it after it was revealed he was a bad guy and it was just him gloating, but I don't remember, someone correct me if I'm wrong, if not then cut it. I have a crap memory.

Edited by piearty
94.2.212.203 Since: Dec, 1969
May 1st 2010 at 7:58:41 PM •••

I know it's spoileriffic, but what do the Wheel of Time pot holes mean?

Hide / Show Replies
Technogeek Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 20th 2010 at 8:58:47 PM •••

I'll try to explain this. Short version: the Aes Sedai are magically bound to "speak no word that is not true". The only exception is the Black Ajah, who have been freed from that oath in order to maintain secrecy. While I don't remember the context of that line, from the pot holes it would seem that the speaker is revealing that she is actually Black Ajah, and has very likely been lying her face off during the entire discussion.

146.115.11.101 Since: Dec, 1969
May 19th 2010 at 5:43:06 AM •••

Uh...is there supposed to be a Western Animation folder? If not, why not, and if so, where'd it go? O_o

Top