Main If Itsyou Its Okay Discussion

Collapse/Expand Topics

06:49:06 PM Feb 20th 2014
edited by revert
05:13:12 AM Jul 16th 2015
Not necessarily, considering that just because someone is asexual (like myself) it doesn't mean that they're attracted to that person DESPITE the first person's sexuality (given that the implication of the trope, after all, is that their attraction to someone is considered outside the purview of their sexuality. For example, if someone was gay and liked a member of the opposite sex because they had the same characteristics that they usually liked in those of the same sex, that would not be called Single Target Sexuality. Would it...?). It may very well be because of their sexuality. So, I would say, it depends....
04:59:45 PM May 1st 2013
Would continuing to be attracted to a transgender after their transformation fall under this category? For example, a man is dating a girl who turns out to be a FTM (female-to-male) but he's completely supportive of his partner and even continues to be attracted to him even when he looks clearly male or at least androgynous, but this male is otherwise straight.
05:37:35 AM May 2nd 2013
Seems like it would be.
12:06:39 AM Aug 16th 2012
edited by MicoolTNT
Let's pick a new pic. This one's more like "Even The Lesbians Want Him because he's a Memetic Sex God" than "one character averts Incompatible Orientation (or other discouraging factor) for just one other character".
09:17:51 PM Aug 3rd 2012
edited by Stormthorn
Why dont we use real life examples? It isnt a negetive trope, is it? I remember an autobiographical webcomic that used this trope, so you cant put it on here as a webcomic without it also being real life, right?

Edit: Found webcomic, its called DAR!
06:42:08 AM Aug 4th 2012
No, that would be fine, because it's an actual published work. The fact that it's autobiographical is neither here nor there (and indeed, many "autobiographies" may be largely or even completely fictional, and we don't really care one way or the other about that either, at least for troping purposes).

I think the "no real life examples" rule in this case is less about negativity and more about preventing the section from turning into "Troper Tales in all but name". Like the section might quickly fill up with entries like:

  • This Troper is a happily married straight girl, but she'd do Angelina Jolie in a heartbeat!
05:16:51 AM Jul 16th 2015

Then what about this one? I don't see a subheading for it, either.
Collapse/Expand Topics