[001]
VVK
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
First and second paragraphs of the description seem to contradict each other as to what the definition is. The first one is quite clear, then the second one starts talking about other things as well. Not sure what to do with it, so I\'ll just point it out, knowing no-one will probably see and care.
to:
First and second paragraphs of the description seem to contradict each other as to what the definition is. The first one is quite clear, then the second one starts talking about other things as well and seems to say it\\\'s the . Not sure what to do with it, so I\\\'ll just point it out, knowing no-one will probably see and care.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"Someone is mostly straight or gay, with one exception. (If they\\\'re asexual with one exception, it\\\'s Single-Target Sexuality.)
A romantic rationalization that removes (or tries to remove) potential squick from a non-standard attraction (Brother–Sister Incest, Mayfly–December Romance, homosexual for an otherwise heterosexual character or vice versa, etc.) often uses this phrase. Since the character (usually) acknowledges the unusualness of the potential pairing, the writer gets to assure the audience they shouldn\\\'t have a problem with it either and to minimize the deviation from canon characterization. \\\"
A romantic rationalization that removes (or tries to remove) potential squick from a non-standard attraction (Brother–Sister Incest, Mayfly–December Romance, homosexual for an otherwise heterosexual character or vice versa, etc.) often uses this phrase. Since the character (usually) acknowledges the unusualness of the potential pairing, the writer gets to assure the audience they shouldn\\\'t have a problem with it either and to minimize the deviation from canon characterization. \\\"
