Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Franchise / MassEffect

Go To

[003] Jonn Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
->* Nintendo\'s critics frequently cry that it needs new IPs, instead of just \'\'SuperMario\'\', \'\'{{Zelda}}\'\', and \'\'{{Metroid}}\'\'. Apparently \'\'[[NintendoWars Battalion Wars]], HotelDusk, ProfessorLayton, AnimalCrossing, CustomRobo, DrillDozer, et al.\'\' don\'t count as \
to:
->* Nintendo\\\'s critics frequently cry that it needs new IPs, instead of just \\\'\\\'SuperMario\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'{{Zelda}}\\\'\\\', and \\\'\\\'{{Metroid}}\\\'\\\'. Apparently \\\'\\\'[[NintendoWars Battalion Wars]], HotelDusk, ProfessorLayton, AnimalCrossing, CustomRobo, DrillDozer, et al.\\\'\\\' don\\\'t count as \\\"new\\\".

This was deleted by Blork using the following reason;

->Other than HotelDusk and ProfessorLayton, they don\\\'t. The NintendoWars series dates back to the NES.

Battalion Wars shares thematic elements with NintendoWars and Advance Wars, but is a different series. Only the Japanese version shares the name. DrillDozer was released in \\\'\\\'\\\'2005\\\'\\\'\\\', and was intended to be a new series. CustomRobo dates back to \\\'\\\'\\\'1999\\\'\\\'\\\'. AnimalCrossing is from \\\'\\\'\\\'2001\\\'\\\'\\\'. HotelDusk is from \\\'\\\'\\\'2007\\\'\\\'\\\', as is ProfessorLayton. Then there\\\'s \\\'\\\'\\\'2001\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'s {{Pikmin}}, and another tentpole franchise I forgot that got started in \\\'\\\'\\\'1996\\\'\\\'\\\'; \\\'\\\'\\\'{{Pokemon}}\\\'\\\'\\\'. Unless your definition of \\\"new\\\" \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' covers the last three years, Nintendo has had plenty of new IPs, even if they haven\\\'t all been successful. The reason whiny fans complain about Nintendo \\\"only\\\" making rehashes is that they\\\'re the only Nintendo games said fans will even consider buying. How many of those \\\'\\\'\\\'seven\\\'\\\'\\\' franchises I just named are commonly associated with Nintendo in the public consciousness?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
->* Nintendo\'s critics frequently cry that it needs new IPs, instead of just \'\'SuperMario\'\', \'\'{{Zelda}}\'\', and \'\'{{Metroid}}\'\'. Apparently \'\'[[NintendoWars Battalion Wars]], HotelDusk, ProfessorLayton, AnimalCrossing, CustomRobo, DrillDozer, et al.\'\' don\'t count as \
to:
->* Nintendo\\\'s critics frequently cry that it needs new IPs, instead of just \\\'\\\'SuperMario\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'{{Zelda}}\\\'\\\', and \\\'\\\'{{Metroid}}\\\'\\\'. Apparently \\\'\\\'[[NintendoWars Battalion Wars]], HotelDusk, ProfessorLayton, AnimalCrossing, CustomRobo, DrillDozer, et al.\\\'\\\' don\\\'t count as \\\"new\\\".

This was deleted by Blork using the following reason;

->Other than HotelDusk and ProfessorLayton, they don\\\'t. The NintendoWars series dates back to the NES.

Battalion Wars shares thematic elements with NintendoWars and Advance Wars, but is a different series. Only the Japanese version shares the name. DrillDozer was released in \\\'\\\'\\\'2005\\\'\\\'\\\', and was intended to be a new series. CustomRobo dates back to \\\'\\\'\\\'1999\\\'\\\'\\\'. AnimalCrossing is from \\\'\\\'\\\'2001\\\'\\\'\\\'. HotelDusk is from \\\'\\\'\\\'2007\\\'\\\'\\\', as is ProfessorLayton. Then there\\\'s \\\'\\\'\\\'2001\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'s {{Pikmin}}, and another tentpole franchise I forgot that got started in 1996; \\\'\\\'\\\'{{Pokemon}}\\\'\\\'\\\'. Unless your definition of \\\"new\\\" \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' covers the last three years, Nintendo has had plenty of new IPs, even if they haven\\\'t all been successful. The reason whiny fans complain about Nintendo \\\"only\\\" making rehashes is that they\\\'re the only Nintendo games said fans will even consider buying. How many of those \\\'\\\'\\\'seven\\\'\\\'\\\' franchises I just named are commonly associated with Nintendo in the public consciousness?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
->* Nintendo\'s critics frequently cry that it needs new IPs, instead of just \'\'SuperMario\'\', \'\'{{Zelda}}\'\', and \'\'{{Metroid}}\'\'. Apparently \'\'[[NintendoWars Battalion Wars]], HotelDusk, ProfessorLayton, AnimalCrossing, CustomRobo, DrillDozer, et al.\'\' don\'t count as \
to:
->* Nintendo\\\'s critics frequently cry that it needs new IPs, instead of just \\\'\\\'SuperMario\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'{{Zelda}}\\\'\\\', and \\\'\\\'{{Metroid}}\\\'\\\'. Apparently \\\'\\\'[[NintendoWars Battalion Wars]], HotelDusk, ProfessorLayton, AnimalCrossing, CustomRobo, DrillDozer, et al.\\\'\\\' don\\\'t count as \\\"new\\\".

This was deleted by Blork using the following reason;

->Other than HotelDusk and ProfessorLayton, they don\\\'t. The NintendoWars series dates back to the NES.

Battalion Wars shares thematic elements with NintendoWars and Advance Wars, but is a different series. Only the Japanese version shares the name. DrillDozer was released in \\\'\\\'\\\'2005\\\'\\\'\\\', and was intended to be a new series. CustomRobo dates back to \\\'\\\'\\\'1999\\\'\\\'\\\'. AnimalCrossing is from \\\'\\\'\\\'2001\\\'\\\'\\\'. HotelDusk is from \\\'\\\'\\\'2007\\\'\\\'\\\', as is ProfessorLayton. Then there\\\'s 2001\\\'s {{Pikmin}}, and another tentpole franchise I forgot that got started in 1996; \\\'\\\'\\\'{{Pokemon}}\\\'\\\'\\\'. Unless your definition of \\\"new\\\" \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' covers the last three years, Nintendo has had plenty of new IPs, even if they haven\\\'t all been successful. The reason whiny fans complain about Nintendo \\\"only\\\" making rehashes is that they\\\'re the only Nintendo games said fans will even consider buying. How many of those \\\'\\\'\\\'seven\\\'\\\'\\\' franchises I just named are commonly associated with Nintendo in the public consciousness?
Top