Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Report it here.
Ye who would Tope Meaninglessness. Ye who ignore All We Have. I say to you You Shall Not Pass!
Suspended. If you have a link that backs up your point, feel free to restore your edit.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Um.
The mod said you can restore your edit if you have a link that backs up your point. There's a link, but it doesn't back up your point about the controversy existing, just a tidbit on age of consent laws which is Values Dissonance at best. In other words you're saying that the thing that might be a point of controversy exists, but not providing evidence that there's backdraft about it.
Internet Backdraft gets wildly misused as a dumping ground for "well, I'm upset about it." That's not backdraft, that's People Sit In Chairs.
Not to mention it's natter and misindented to boot.
Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
In that case, it's best left off.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
I sent a private message to them asking them to check back here.
... and actually, looking over the example the natter was attached to, it's an awful example. Aside from factual inaccuracies (Jun and Tatsuya isn't canon as an Official Couple, he's just a canon Gay Option. Subtle but still inaccurate).
But my problem is that the example is so knee-jerk that it's not even claiming that there is no Gay Option, it's claiming that one of them isn't a gay option and doesn't know about the other. That's... just sloppy. The game came out recently so it's currently unconfirmed if there's a gay option one way or the other.
Since he's been told to come here I'm not going to bother deleting it and hope that he fixes it himself.
Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
That's fine by me. I tried to be impartial, but if the wiki feels like it would be better be left off, I have no problems.
just to clarify two small things, when I said "official" I didn't mean as an Official Couple, I meant that they were official in the sense that it was actually included in canon as a Gay Option, so if there was confusion over that, then I'm sorry, I misworded it. Second of all, at least one guide ( http://toragame.com/persona5/)
confirmed that neither Yusuke's nor Yuki's Co-Ops can be leveled into romances at Rank 8 as with the female options, and I've updated my entry to include it.
Thanks. That's exactly why I didn't want to delete the entry; I was pretty sure it was right, but it just was worded like it wasn't.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
EDIT: I've been having recurring issues with maneatingbackpack
deleting a YMMV entry on the Persona 5 page. I've added an entry under Internet Backdraft describing why some fans have have been upset about the lack of a gay option, and after its initial deletion, I added more detail, and sourced a point of contention around the age of consent in Japan. It was deleted again, with the reason being that they didn't even bother reading the link I used.
Edited by defciggy