Follow TV Tropes

Following

Duplicate Trope: Larynx Dissonance

Go To

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#26: Sep 27th 2016 at 2:44:40 PM

There are a bunch of examples that follow the description, depending on interpretation.

Check out my fanfiction!
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#27: Sep 27th 2016 at 9:12:48 PM

Yeah, but they're still a minority. It would be easier to TLP that with a new name, and turn this into disambiguation between Cross-Dressing Voices, Vocal Dissonance and the new trope.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#28: Sep 28th 2016 at 3:22:42 AM

That doesn't mean there's "nothing to save". And I don't see what's wrong with the name anyway.

Check out my fanfiction!
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#29: Sep 28th 2016 at 12:34:05 PM

I don't mean there's "nothing to save". I mean you move over the correct examples to a TLP and use it as the next step to fixing the trope, as is sometimes done. And people obviously find the name confusing, "larynx" being a somewhat technical term. They confuse it for either Vocal Dissonance or Cross-Dressing Voices.

Berrenta MOD How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#30: Oct 18th 2016 at 6:11:31 AM

Crowner hooked.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#31: Oct 23rd 2016 at 7:48:00 PM

Bumping for votes. While two options are in the green, one of them depends on another entry that at the moment is breaking even.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#32: Oct 24th 2016 at 4:09:17 PM

A wick check to prove people confuse it with Vocal Dissonance:

Also, looking through the wicks I can see the examples which actually follow the description, as opposed to the ones on the page which are mostly either misuse or ZCEs.

TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#33: Oct 26th 2016 at 6:20:06 PM

New option added to the crowner. I must say, after seeing actual good examples, I've changed my mind about merging.

edited 26th Oct '16 6:22:07 PM by TropesForever

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#34: Nov 1st 2016 at 1:56:19 PM

Bumping for votes; the rename option needs three more total votes before we can safely call this.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
darkchiefy Since: Jul, 2015
#35: Nov 24th 2016 at 11:56:26 AM

is 11 yays enough for the rename option?

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#36: Nov 24th 2016 at 12:45:41 PM

Reagrdless of the results of the mrge rename crowner, I've edited the Laconic of Larynx Dissonance to this:

"A person trying to sound like the opposite gender often just sounds... wrong."

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#37: Nov 24th 2016 at 12:55:24 PM

I'm seriously confused by this whole thing. Isn't the trope's definition "A man with a woman's voice/a woman with a man's voice"?

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#38: Nov 24th 2016 at 2:03:51 PM

That laconic is accurate enough, I believe.

Check out my fanfiction!
Berrenta MOD How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#39: Nov 24th 2016 at 8:08:20 PM

Calling the rename option. Now, time to think of possible new names.

Disambig option, meanwhile, has too low of a ratio for consensus.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#41: Nov 24th 2016 at 8:27:43 PM

Not too bad. Been thinking about it for a while, but nothing's come up that's both descriptive enough to avoid misuse and brief enough to actually be a name.

Maybe Cross Gender Voice Fail?

Check out my fanfiction!
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#42: Nov 24th 2016 at 8:29:48 PM

Is "fail" part of the definition?

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#43: Nov 24th 2016 at 8:36:44 PM

Well, it can be deliberate, so it doesn't cover absolutely everything. You can also argue that's deliberately invoking the trope, which would not be a straight example, but playing with it.

Check out my fanfiction!
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#44: Nov 24th 2016 at 8:41:56 PM

So, is there a trope for "A woman is obviously voiced by a man or vice versa" or is that covered by Cross-Dressing Voices?

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#45: Nov 24th 2016 at 9:31:24 PM

Clumsy Crossdressing Voice ?

I don't know, but from reading the trope is seems that the trope is when a Crossdressing Voice is poorly done; a female voice that is unnaturally deepened or a male pitching his voice to falsetto because they thing the pitch is the only thing that matters..

edited 24th Nov '16 9:32:30 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#47: Nov 24th 2016 at 9:57:44 PM

No. Why do you say that?

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
TropesForever from TropesForever Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: I love you for psychological reasons
#48: Nov 24th 2016 at 10:10:21 PM

"The trope is when a Crossdressing Voice is poorly done." Unless you only count deliberate examples, in which case there would be better ways to define it.

Getta Since: Apr, 2016
#49: Nov 25th 2016 at 3:38:37 AM

Um, wouldn't "Trope Y is Trope X but done badly" be a bad thing?

We don't need justice when we can forgive. We don't need tolerance when we can love.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#50: Nov 25th 2016 at 4:48:15 AM

The "done badly" part is more of a Watsonian concern than a Doylist one. Cross-Dressing Voices is also explicitly about voice actors, while this one also includes characters doing impersonations.

Check out my fanfiction!

PageAction: LarynxDissonance
17th Oct '16 8:46:02 PM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 79
Top