Follow TV Tropes

Following

Misused: Transforming Mecha

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Dec 26th 2014 at 11:59:00 PM
Nathanoraptor Since: Oct, 2010
#1: Sep 16th 2014 at 1:35:56 PM

Transforming Mecha is supposed to be about a robot transforming into an alternate form (e.g. car, jet, beast, vending machine). It's now used to refer to any mechanical item that changes form somehow, including cars sprouting jet engines and/or weapons.

I figure we should split and put vehicles with weapons or jet engines into another trope (I suggest Weaponised Vehicle). But I just want to know if it's a good idea before proceeding.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#2: Oct 19th 2014 at 12:43:13 AM

Opening this an calling ~Nathanoraptor, since I am seeing quite some misuse as the OP describes.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#3: Oct 19th 2014 at 1:02:47 AM

Going to wholeheartedly agree, Transforming Mecha should be about well... Mecha. "Mecha is a science fiction genre that centers on robots or machines controlled by people. These machines vary greatly in size, shape, and appearance. Some are little more than cars with arms and legs, while others are giant humanoid constructs."

It does not cover normal cars, motorcycles and other mundane vehicles with some transforming capabilities like the Men in Black car unless they transform into Mecha.

edited 19th Oct '14 1:44:22 AM by Memers

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#4: Oct 19th 2014 at 2:25:59 AM

Yeah. Unless it transforms into some kind of mecha, it's not this trope.

I think it would be a good idea to split it to Transforming Vehicle for cases where it's a vehicle that changes mode but remains a vehicle (such as K.I.T.T. or an F-14 Tomcat).

Check out my fanfiction!
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#5: Oct 19th 2014 at 8:40:21 AM

Yeah, I think the biggest issue with the shoehorning here is that it lacks it's own trope. Really what we need is a Transforming Machine trope to supertrope this and a new Transforming Vehicle trope and all the misuse will go away when they have a place to go.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
SatoshiBakura (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#6: Oct 19th 2014 at 8:48:48 AM

[up] I may start on those Ykttws soon. Transforming Vehicle first though.

edited 19th Oct '14 8:49:41 AM by SatoshiBakura

NativeJovian Jupiterian Local from Orlando, FL Since: Mar, 2014 Relationship Status: Maxing my social links
Jupiterian Local
#7: Oct 19th 2014 at 8:53:06 AM

Would a mecha that transforms into a vehicle be an example of both Transforming Mecha and Transforming Vehicle, or would the two be mutually exclusive? I mean, there are mecha that transform into things other than vehicles, and vehicles that transform into things other than mecha, but we need to make it clear if overlap between the two tropes is allowed.

Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#8: Oct 19th 2014 at 8:53:21 AM

Make sure to rip all the 'bad examples' from this page to help populate it. I really think that making those tropes to cover this misuse will fix this trope.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
SatoshiBakura (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9: Oct 19th 2014 at 9:08:25 AM

Okay, I started the Transforming Vehicle YKTTW. Come here and help stop this misuse.

edited 19th Oct '14 9:08:48 AM by SatoshiBakura

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#10: Oct 19th 2014 at 10:49:53 AM

[up][up][up] If they are like the Transformers and are seemingly normal cars and then transform into mecha then yes they would fall under both, now if they are mecha which transform into unique designed tanks or jet modes and you can still tell its a mech then no.

The only murky examples I can think of would be the few mecha series that have a few mecha that do not follow traditional mecha rules, mostly early 70s shows before rules were established, however I can not think of one that transforms.

Edit: well the YKTTW a seems to have a different idea, which probably works better.

edited 19th Oct '14 10:59:22 AM by Memers

SatoshiBakura (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#11: Oct 19th 2014 at 11:01:47 AM

[up] I thought I had the idea, but I guess not. I could always add on to it, though.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#12: Oct 19th 2014 at 11:13:02 AM

The YKTTW does seem rather limited seeing how we have Cars that transform into motorcycles or boats or jets and stuff which are not mecha.

edited 19th Oct '14 11:43:13 AM by Memers

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#13: Oct 19th 2014 at 11:26:31 AM

That would be why we're making sister and parent tropes to cover everything. The misuse is just pointing to a missing trope in this case.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#14: Oct 19th 2014 at 11:50:06 AM

Oh I agree, I was just talking about how the YKTTW seems limited in scope, but then again are full transformations like say Spy Hunter different than say the Green Hornet car which has minor transformations like deployable rockets and such? Would that be two tropes or just one?

SatoshiBakura (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#15: Oct 19th 2014 at 11:53:43 AM

[up] I tweaked the definition to cover more areas.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#16: Oct 19th 2014 at 2:49:40 PM

There's no difference between a car that transforms into a mecha and a mecha that transforms into a car. I'd also exclude those that can transform into a mecha from Transforming Vehicle. I don't think having that overlap adds anything, sort of like insisting on listing every example of a subtrope on its supertrope. Sure, it won't be absolutely all examples, but I don't think the distinction between the two is notable.

Check out my fanfiction!
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#17: Nov 19th 2014 at 9:01:40 AM

Clock is set.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SatoshiBakura (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#18: Nov 19th 2014 at 2:04:13 PM

I think we have already fixed this.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#19: Nov 23rd 2014 at 1:40:29 AM

Well, what about the wicks? I know, nobody has claimed that the wicks are problematic but still, should we do anything about them?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#20: Dec 23rd 2014 at 1:39:29 AM

Re-clocking, because there doesn't seem to have been a cleanup.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#21: Dec 27th 2014 at 4:56:18 AM

Clock is up with no progress; closing.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Add Post

Total posts: 21
Top