Follow TV Tropes

Following

Suggestion: Hood Hopping

Go To

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#1: Jan 23rd 2014 at 12:44:52 PM

I just looked through the examples and found the best ones I could find. 1 & 2, and this

This has the best display of motion although not during a chase.

Fantastically unrelated but what the diddle!

edited 23rd Jan '14 1:02:44 PM by Paktra

treelo Since: Jun, 2010
#2: Jan 23rd 2014 at 1:27:01 PM

1.3 probably, the rest no.

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#3: Jan 23rd 2014 at 1:37:32 PM

I second 1.3 along with 1.1.

BaconManiac5000 Since: Nov, 2013 Relationship Status: Baby don't hurt me!
#4: Jan 23rd 2014 at 1:46:39 PM

[up]

what do you mean I didn't win, I ate more wet t-shirts than anyone else
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#5: Jan 23rd 2014 at 1:48:54 PM

I like 1.1. 1.2 and 1.3 seem a bit ambiguous (is he jumping from the bridge or from the car? And is the latter a jump?).

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#6: Jan 23rd 2014 at 1:56:49 PM

1.1 and 1.2, combined with a shot of the Agent actually crushing the car under him as he lands, works best for me.

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#7: Jan 23rd 2014 at 1:59:29 PM

[up] if someone could find that third shot that I couldn't find, it'd be much appreciated.

Noaqiyeum Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they) from the gentle and welcoming dark (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: Arm chopping is not a love language!
Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#9: Jan 25th 2014 at 7:19:39 PM

Thanks although the second one is pretty cool it seems a bit unnecessary, but the other three are good I will work on combining them later.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#10: Jan 25th 2014 at 8:29:36 PM

Honestly, I like all four of them together...let's see a version with three and another with all four and compare them.

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#11: Jan 25th 2014 at 8:56:44 PM

1) First three, stacked vertical orientation, excess lateral scan cut. (the motion blur on the Agent in the 2nd frame was intentional to hide the obvious cgi use in that movie sad)

edited 26th Jan '14 12:28:23 AM by Paktra

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#12: Jan 25th 2014 at 11:52:00 PM

2) landscape orientation, tighter cut

edited 25th Jan '14 11:52:38 PM by Paktra

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#13: Jan 26th 2014 at 12:39:23 AM

3) All four frames, 90o stack in landscape, (not all frames were the same height once dead space cropped out though)

edited 26th Jan '14 12:39:44 AM by Paktra

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14: Jan 26th 2014 at 1:09:50 AM

They are somewhat foggy.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#15: Jan 26th 2014 at 1:14:20 AM

You mean the compression?

Yes these were the largest/ clearest versions I could GIS.sad

Perhaps I should make the smaller than 350 to compensate for their (rather large) lateral ratio? I mean even at wiki size they are huge!

edited 26th Jan '14 1:15:18 AM by Paktra

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#16: Jan 26th 2014 at 7:58:08 AM

They're a little fuzzy, but more than clear enough to see what's going on...I like the last one best. How do they look at 300 px?

edited 26th Jan '14 7:58:38 AM by Willbyr

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#19: Jan 26th 2014 at 10:09:09 AM

[tup] just to have something.

Unless someone wants some pictures of Spiderman or something?

justanid Since: Jan, 2010
#20: Jan 26th 2014 at 3:53:00 PM

Other than being really long, #17 seems fine.

Koveras Mastermind Rational from Germany Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Drift compatible
Mastermind Rational
#21: Jan 27th 2014 at 12:39:33 AM

The #17 works for me, too. smile

edited 27th Jan '14 12:39:49 AM by Koveras

treelo Since: Jun, 2010
#22: Jan 27th 2014 at 12:56:57 AM

That is far too long for the expanded Laconic that trope has for a description.

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#23: Jan 27th 2014 at 2:23:33 AM

If anyone else here feels that 17 is too long should I make a 2 by 2 grid version instead?

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#24: Jan 27th 2014 at 2:40:58 AM

Does it need four frames? What about just the last two?

edited 27th Jan '14 2:42:15 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#25: Jan 27th 2014 at 4:01:37 AM

With some judicious cropping/resizing, the first two frames could possibly be put side-by-side, and the bottom two left as is. It's definitely going to hang down into the examples in any case...I'm not terribly concerned about that since the page isn't folderized.

edited 27th Jan '14 4:01:54 AM by Willbyr

ImagePickin: HoodHopping
30th Jan '14 6:21:01 AM

Crown Description:

Nominations for replacement images:

Total posts: 62
Top