Poor Image: Inventor Of The Mundane

Although the guy's invention -is- in the picture, it's pretty much impossible to find without being familiar with the movie, and it gets dangerously close to being just a face and a caption.

Me being me, my own suggestion is the first or second panel of this: [1]◊

Current is terrible. Suggestion is funny. The thing with Dilbert is, we'll have to arrange it vertically to work, but it'll work.

I think one panel (either the first or second) is illustrative enough, so there's probably no need to arrange them vertically.

Current's JAFAAC, yank it. The first two panels of the suggestion are nice. Either one could work, but I lean towards the second because of Dogbertio's reaction emphasizing the mundanity.

edited 6th Jan '14 11:14:43 PM by Synchronicity

Suggestion (any panel combination) is much better than the current, which is pure JAFAAC.

2+3 communicate what's needed.

2+3. First one is too big. Posting a smaller one.

edited 7th Jan '14 5:07:42 AM by Rethkir

I like it

Yeah, 2 and 3.

Just 2 is... fitting, but boring as hell. Adding 3 makes it much funnier.

7.2 is good.

I'm good with 7.2

7.2 is excellent.

This thread went well; up, potholed, and tagged. I'm fine with or without a caption.

edited 7th Jan '14 10:32:19 AM by Telcontar

7.2 is the greatest thing since unsliced bread.

One or two more votes for 7.2 and we can patent it.

7.2's already on the page.

Old:

Cool. This doesn't seem to need a caption, but add one if you want one. Locking up in the meantime.