Follow TV Tropes

Following

Does Not Illustrate: Slap Slap Kiss

Go To

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#1: Apr 27th 2013 at 4:35:02 AM

As the caption indicates, the image on Slap-Slap-Kiss is actually an example of its counterpart trope, Kiss-Kiss-Slap. So I suggest we move it there.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#2: Apr 27th 2013 at 5:02:32 AM

I think it sits in the middle of both. Not sure what to do with it.

Check out my fanfiction!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4: Apr 27th 2013 at 6:42:38 AM

Maybe the last two panels of this?

Leaper Since: May, 2009
#5: Apr 27th 2013 at 9:52:11 PM

Well, Kiss-Kiss-Slap doesn't even have an image. I definitely think the current should be moved over there.

lexicon Since: May, 2012
#6: Apr 27th 2013 at 10:05:07 PM

The Donald Duck isn't clearly either one. I say drop it or take away the last panel. The suggestion makes her look intentionally crazy instead of emotionally impulsive. Maybe that can still count but I don't think it looks as good.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#7: Apr 27th 2013 at 10:19:53 PM

Neither pair is this exactly, but roughly: Pabels 1 and 2 are Slap-Slap-Kiss, and Panels 2 and 3 are Kiss-Kiss-Slap. Either way it should lose one panel.

edited 27th Apr '13 10:20:07 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#8: Apr 28th 2013 at 1:33:14 PM

I like that idea: put frame 1 and 2 on the first trope, frame 2 and 3 on the second.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#9: Apr 28th 2013 at 9:08:33 PM

I'm asking the rest of the staff for opinions, considering it's playing around with the "one unique pic per trope page" rule...myself, I don't have an issue with the suggestion.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#10: Apr 29th 2013 at 12:05:25 AM

That was not my suggestion.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#11: Apr 29th 2013 at 12:09:44 AM

Maybe that's not the way you meant it but unless we have something better for either then I think we should go for it unless it breaks the "one unique pic per trope page" rule.

Telcontar In uffish thought from England Since: Feb, 2012
In uffish thought
#12: Apr 29th 2013 at 12:41:12 AM

Whilst page pics should usually be unique because (a) it makes the wiki more interesting and (b) the same pic probably doesn't fit equally well on two pages, I think having corresponding images can be fun. This would be more overlap than other times (which I can't name off the top of my head), but that's part of the point.

That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#13: Apr 29th 2013 at 3:52:36 AM

What response I got was supportive, so if spreading the pic out over the two pages is the consensus decision, then it's fine.

[up] In regards to corresponding images, that's what's happened with Mistaken for Cheating and O.O.C. Is Serious Business since they're taken from the same sequence in Questionable Content.

edited 29th Apr '13 3:54:02 AM by Willbyr

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#14: Apr 29th 2013 at 7:34:35 AM

I think it works. It's not like the tropes are entirely unrelated, and the image does highlight somewhat different aspects. This is a case where order makes all the difference, and that is the difference.

Check out my fanfiction!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#15: May 3rd 2013 at 9:29:06 AM

Bump; any other thoughts on the proposal?

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#16: May 8th 2013 at 1:52:57 PM

One last bump; if there aren't any serious objections or other suggestions then I'll go ahead and split the pics out per the suggestion.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#17: May 13th 2013 at 7:08:50 PM

Hearing nothing, I've split the pics over the two pages and tagged each accordingly. Add captions if you want them; locking up.

Add Post

Total posts: 17
Top