Follow TV Tropes

Following

Should Disney make More CGI Films?

Go To

T448Eight XBOX: Turn on. XBOX: On. XBOX: Buy me a PS 4 from In Your Living Room Since: Jan, 2013
XBOX: Turn on. XBOX: On. XBOX: Buy me a PS 4
#1: Mar 29th 2013 at 3:55:30 PM

It works for Pixar and Dreamworks, and even worked for Wreck-It-Ralph.

Will it work for Disney's own independent films?

The world isn't ready for giant T4 combustion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GbpGiYmBSs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKm9
maxwellelvis Mad Scientist Wannabe from undisclosed location Since: Oct, 2009 Relationship Status: In my bunk
Mad Scientist Wannabe
#2: Mar 29th 2013 at 4:02:01 PM

Either way, they already are. I think their hand drawn days are behind them.

Of course, don't you know anything about ALCHEMY?!- Twin clones of Ivan the Great
KnownUnknown Since: Jan, 2001
#3: Mar 29th 2013 at 4:08:09 PM

If the writing's good and they manage to use the style and medium to the fullest... sure, why not?

"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.
Canid117 Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#4: Mar 29th 2013 at 4:35:14 PM

I don't really care if the animation is CG or hand drawn as long as its good.

"War without fire is like sausages without mustard." - Jean Juvénal des Ursins
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#5: Mar 29th 2013 at 5:30:42 PM

Should Disney make More CGI Films?
The Princess And The Frog and Winnie The Pooh aside, that's all they've been making for like a decade now.

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
Smasher from The 1830's, but without the racists (Don’t ask) Relationship Status: The best thing that ever happened to a bum like me
#6: Mar 30th 2013 at 3:03:32 PM

No, because they'll be mistaken for Pixar.

CorrTerek The Permanently Confused from The Bland Line Since: Jul, 2009
The Permanently Confused
#7: Mar 30th 2013 at 3:30:19 PM

Disney is Pixar. Or Pixar is Disney, whichever.

TheShopSoldier THE DISGRACE STILL LINGERS UPON ME from Messin' with Neo Arcadia... Just Because Since: Jan, 2013 Relationship Status: I like big bots and I can not lie
THE DISGRACE STILL LINGERS UPON ME
#8: Mar 30th 2013 at 5:53:02 PM

@OP: Only if they continue to suck less - or better yet (because some of them have, IMHO, not suck... much (if not AT ALL)...

Even if I had different face, I AM STILL DISGRACED.
NapoleonDeCheese Since: Oct, 2010
#9: Mar 30th 2013 at 7:26:59 PM

Disney's non-Pixar CGI movies tend to feel more like Dreamworks movies, at least to me.

blueflame724 Since: May, 2010
#10: Mar 31st 2013 at 3:23:06 PM

Well cgi is just a medium, so if they feel stories would be better told with cg then I don't see why not. Obviously I don't want this to come at the expense of hand-drawn animation though, I'm sure we all want both.

I treat all living things equally. That is to say, I eat all living things
CTM Only Sane Man from Connecticut Since: Jan, 2010
#11: Mar 31st 2013 at 4:07:59 PM

Sure why not. But it'd be nice to see some drawn films too.

Easy street has no parking signs.
Pingu Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: In Lesbians with you
#12: Mar 31st 2013 at 4:08:17 PM

I'd definitely like to see more hand-drawn animation. I do prefer the look of 2D, and I'd like to at least see some 2D releases out there sometimes, at least to have a greater variety of animation styles.

Bunai Cyber Bunny from Jupiter Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: Singularity
Cyber Bunny
#13: Mar 31st 2013 at 11:51:42 PM

I would say no. They are using CGI in attempts to be appealing because they think that is what people want these days. They fail to grasp that the reason Pixar and Dreamworks has been so well received is because they work to make a good story that happens to be visualized using CGI.

TParadox Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: The captain of her heart
#14: Apr 1st 2013 at 12:52:19 AM

It should be a tool in the box, just like traditional, live action, cut-paper, and clay.

Disney's non-Pixar CGI movies tend to feel more like Dreamworks movies, at least to me.

Except Wreck-It Ralph felt like Pixar and Brave felt like Dreamworks trying to be Disney.

Fresh-eyed movie blog
NapoleonDeCheese Since: Oct, 2010
#15: Apr 1st 2013 at 10:49:45 AM

Ralph felt like Dreamworks at its best with a few dashes of Pixar. Which is no insult, because at its best, Dreamworks can be actually quite good.

kyun Since: Dec, 2010
#16: Apr 1st 2013 at 11:29:24 AM

Given the layoffs and buyouts from major VFX studios we've had in the past months, Disney should seriously tread themselves delicately with their future developments. I would love to see them return to hand-drawn animation, but only if they CON-CEN-TRATE ON A GREAT STO-RY AND TELL THE MAR-KET-ING DE-PART-MENT TO RE-LEASE IT ON THE RIGHT DATE!!! They goofed up with The Princess And The Frog, and the following hand-drawn film Winnie-the-Pooh didn't help boost enthusiasm.

edited 1st Apr '13 11:30:52 AM by kyun

Mort08 Pirate AND writer! from Oklahoma Since: Feb, 2011 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
Pirate AND writer!
#17: Apr 1st 2013 at 1:50:05 PM

They probably won't be doing anything other than CGI for a while. Moviegoers (at least American ones) don't seem to care about any other forms of animation very much.

Looking for some stories?
kyun Since: Dec, 2010
#18: Apr 1st 2013 at 1:57:14 PM

To this day, I have no idea why I keep this is my bookmarks bar. Maybe I either respect unbroken promises, or I enjoy torturing my nerves.

truteal animation elitist from the great southern land Since: Sep, 2009
animation elitist
#19: Apr 1st 2013 at 1:57:58 PM

Of course they shouldn't, but they are going to, so it doesn't really matter

http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/ http://sagan4.com/forum/index.php
PhysicalStamina so i made a new avatar from Who's askin'? Since: Apr, 2012 Relationship Status: It's so nice to be turned on again
so i made a new avatar
#20: Apr 1st 2013 at 8:43:01 PM

This is pretty much what they're doing.

To pity someone is to tell them "I feel bad about being better than you."
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#21: Apr 1st 2013 at 10:30:23 PM

[up][up]Why shouldn't they?

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
TParadox Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: The captain of her heart
#22: Apr 1st 2013 at 10:32:45 PM

I don't think anybody has an objection to Disney making CG films, just to them making CG films to the exclusion of traditional style.

I think they should make a Paperman-style hybrid every cycle.

Fresh-eyed movie blog
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#23: Apr 1st 2013 at 10:33:31 PM

[up]That'd be a neat thing.

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
TParadox Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: The captain of her heart
#24: Apr 1st 2013 at 10:36:14 PM

They need to modify the method to make it less work-intensive though. Probably that mostly entails getting the ink mapping more accurate.

  1. rough animate CGI

  2. draw ink keyframes

  3. render ink inbetweens

  4. fix the inbetweens because the computer is an idiot

Fresh-eyed movie blog
Canid117 Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#25: Apr 2nd 2013 at 4:16:53 PM

The computer does exactly what you tell it to and not what you want it to. Don't blame the computer because the guy who made the program wasn't able to make it work properly.

"War without fire is like sausages without mustard." - Jean Juvénal des Ursins

Total posts: 244
Top