Follow TV Tropes

Following

Mass Effect cleanup

Go To

ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#26: May 22nd 2012 at 12:50:44 PM

Low quality photoshop edit to a free image seems like They Just Didn't Care to me, honestly.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#27: May 22nd 2012 at 1:04:26 PM

If you saw a personal attack in what I said, you were looking to be offended. I didn't personally attack anyone.

As for that pic, that's the kind of thing Special Effect Failure is meant for. And beyond that, it could be described much more briefly than what is currently on the page. That is a bunch of Natter.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Tiamatty X-Men X-Pert from Now on Twitter Since: Jan, 2010 Relationship Status: Brony
#28: May 22nd 2012 at 1:07:09 PM

I would argue that Tali's picture does belong in TJDC. It was a half-assed approach they took. They probably spent 5 minutes finding an image, and another 5 Photoshopping it.

X-Men X-Pert, my blog where I talk about X-Men comics.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#29: May 22nd 2012 at 1:07:14 PM

Natter is not about articles being long or short. Natter is basically conversation present in the entry.

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#30: May 22nd 2012 at 1:13:23 PM

I know what Natter is. My point is that much of that entry, which I'd move to Special Effects Failure, does count as Natter.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#31: May 22nd 2012 at 1:19:03 PM

I don't know how anyone can see Natter on this:

"After spending two games hyping up what Tali looks like, they reveal her face now. People who romance Tali can get a picture of her. It's just a royalty free stock photo of a brunette smiling with the sun behind her, that's been altered◊ slightly in Photoshop. "

The only mistake here is that I think you can get the photo even if you don't romance her (if she dies).

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#32: May 22nd 2012 at 1:21:26 PM

I meant the whole of the TJDC entry on the game is Natter, not just the one line.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#33: May 22nd 2012 at 1:23:36 PM

The rest was removed because even if the ending was horrible it doesn't belong to TJDC. I wanted to move those lines to Shocking Swerve, after a cleanup. I posted my version of said lines a few posts ago.

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#34: May 22nd 2012 at 1:28:57 PM

I'm looking at the YMMV page for Mass Effect 3 right now. The entry for TJDC features the second bullet point conversing with the first, and the fourth looks like it's talking with itself. Yes, there is natter on that entry. And not all related to the picture. Nor is it all related to the ending.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
lu127 Paper Master from 異界 Since: Sep, 2011 Relationship Status: Crazy Cat Lady
#35: May 22nd 2012 at 1:30:44 PM

...you're looking at the wrong page. We were talking about the main They Just Didn't Care page.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#36: May 22nd 2012 at 1:40:31 PM

For the YMMV They Just Didn't Care entry in Mass Effect 3, I would only leave Tali's photo, the artbook example cited there, and maybe the ending flashbacks for love interests. For the ones who don't know about this, at the end you get a flashback of the face of your love interest, but if you chose certain people (Tali, Jack, etc) you get the default Liara flashback instead. It's not a bug because the flashbacks for these characters do not appear in the game files.

There was also a photoshopped ad that copied another ad from The Walking Dead, but I am not sure if this was Bioware/EA's fault or what. Does anyone remember this incident?

edited 22nd May '12 1:42:14 PM by Anfauglith

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#37: May 22nd 2012 at 1:49:55 PM

Ah... see, when I saw the title of the page, I was looking at the issues on the Mass Effect pages themselves (though I do know that both sets of pages needed cleaning). That does clear up a bunch.

I'm willing to keep the artbook entry, since the entire artbook seems to have been put together by someone who slept through the process. The others (particularly the ending parts, because of just how controversial anything involving the ending is), I'd move to other tropes or just cut outright. That'd be the solution that would involve the least amount of controversy, given the trope in question.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#38: May 22nd 2012 at 1:54:25 PM

It's not just because of the controversy, it's because storytelling failures do not count as They Just Didn't Care, so we agree there. Well I had never seen these entries before, and they look too biased. Now they will get even more credibility while still focusing on the objective problems with the game instead of losing themselves in pointless hyperbole.

Anyways I have to go now, I will be back later. 2 or 3 hours later, to be precise.

Oh and mods look into my holler about the vandal if you can, please. It would be very appreciated.

edited 22nd May '12 2:08:29 PM by Anfauglith

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
Spirit Pretty flower from America Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: Hooked on a feeling
Pretty flower
#39: May 22nd 2012 at 1:56:19 PM

Apparently the Mass Effect/Walking Dead poster was a official cross promotion. Bioware did give Walking Dead its first Mass Effect 3 commercial airing rights. While it is another quick shop I don't think it fits They Just Didn't Care.

edited 22nd May '12 2:07:59 PM by Spirit

#IceBearForPresident
lilyxlightning Since: May, 2012
#40: May 22nd 2012 at 2:13:56 PM

Think we should touch on the YMMV page for ME3? Or just focus on trope pages for now?

"Fine! If you're so enamored of that object, then I suggest you get your own feces analyzer."
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#41: May 22nd 2012 at 2:19:06 PM

Well, they'll have to be taken care of eventually - if nothing else, if you remove parts of the entries for Mass Effect from the trope pages but not the pages for the games, someone will come by and "helpfully" cross-reference the content.

In some ways, it'd actually be easier (especially with Mass Effect 3, since the page is locked and thus safe from further objectionable additions) to clean the pages for the games themselves and follow by scrubbing the tropes in question.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#42: May 22nd 2012 at 4:30:29 PM

Not to bring us back to something that you guys moved on from, but I'm disputing the Tali photo from They Just Didn't Care. Based off comments from one of the writers EA was very stingy with giving Bioware resources, and that caused a lot of corners to be cut in order to meet the second deadline. So it's less a case of Bioware not caring about Tali and more a case of Bioware not having the time and money to create a new 3D model to show her face.

fakeangelbr The Awesomest Character from Fortaleza, Brazil Since: Jan, 2010
The Awesomest Character
#43: May 22nd 2012 at 4:39:55 PM

Show us your source and we may overturn the decision.

Donate money to Skullgirls, get a sweet poster.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#44: May 22nd 2012 at 4:54:00 PM

Then EA didn't care. 'Tis the same. Oh and there was a full model done for Jessica Chobot so I don't think that excuse is valid.

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#46: May 22nd 2012 at 5:09:06 PM

Not really. Bioware even defended the crappy photoshop, saying it fits their artistic vision for her face and whatever. I can find a source if anyone needs it. Plus there were countless options for dealing with the issue that weren't making a 2 minute photoshop.

edited 22nd May '12 5:09:50 PM by Anfauglith

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
fakeangelbr The Awesomest Character from Fortaleza, Brazil Since: Jan, 2010
The Awesomest Character
#47: May 22nd 2012 at 5:09:39 PM

Did they?

I don't remember this happening.

In other words: pics or didn't happen.

Donate money to Skullgirls, get a sweet poster.
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#48: May 22nd 2012 at 5:15:32 PM

Lo and behold the Source.

Also, this is just awesome

edited 22nd May '12 5:30:31 PM by Anfauglith

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
lilyxlightning Since: May, 2012
#49: May 22nd 2012 at 5:30:05 PM

Then does it count as They Just Didn't Care if the developers like the end result? The article states that they "poured through thousands and thousands of source art to lock in." It would be sort of the same thing as looking through various models to decide who they would base other characters' appearances off of.

(Pretty interesting read too, Anfauglith! =^_^=)

"Fine! If you're so enamored of that object, then I suggest you get your own feces analyzer."
Anfauglith Lord of Castamere Since: Dec, 2011
Lord of Castamere
#50: May 22nd 2012 at 5:34:00 PM

It counts because it's a cheap photoshop. Developers defend the end result, so it means they do not regret anything about it because it fits their "artistic vision"; they don't even excuse themselves. I repeat, it's a cheap photoshop of a royalty-free image.

Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.

Total posts: 193
Top