The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

I've played Crescendo, it would probably fail the 5P test to stay here.

There are endings that end in little to no sex scenes, it's pretty vanilla for the most part (the violent gang rape only occurs in one route) and it has a pretty high plot to porn ratio.

However, it would still fail the standards since it does have some explicit scenes that are unavoidable depending on which routes you pick.

Sex scenes aren't a disqualifier; "a high plot to porn ratio" usually means we call a keep unless it's a pedo scene.

Well, it has no pedo scenes I can recall, all parties are older teen to adult looking to my knowledge, been awhile since I played it, so I might have forgotten something

Crescendo passes easily. There are no underaged characters and not many sex scenes.

Duly noted.

edited 19th Aug '15 6:47:41 PM by tdgoodrich1

Edit: Never mind then!

edited 19th Aug '15 6:49:14 PM by Arha

Boycott the Caf has mentions of "Hot middle school ass" on the YMMV page.

It hosts reviews for Degrassi. The humour is really off-colour, as you can probably guess from the site's tagline, but I don't think it contains explicit paedo-pandering material at first glance.

How do you make a report? I was going to make one for Tales Of Schlock, which is being discussed in the The P5 issue and lewdness issues, linked post is start of the discussion.

Then the page needs to be cleaned up.

I've flagged it; the first three "issues" are fetish porn, pure and simple.

Example removed. It wasn't an appropriate use of Memetic Molester anyway. Going to review the page to make sure I haven't missed anything.

EDIT: Okay, scanned through a few episode reviews so far. Tagline (the aforementioned "We Salute that Hot Middle School Ass") aside, haven't found anything breaching our guidelines yet.

edited 22nd Aug '15 9:11:03 AM by Pyrite

<looks at Tales Of Schlock for review>

Well, if you wanted a completely clear case of something to cut under the policy, you've got it. It's a fetish comic with Excuse Plots to get women violated in various ways, and that's all that needs to be said about it. Oh, and the art isn't very good either.

Schlock and load your guns, and fire this comic away.

Was that your face after reading it? /s.

(I post on Reddit too much.)

edited 22nd Aug '15 3:35:55 PM by TheOneWhoTropes

For whatever reason I cannot find the report button, but Sandraand Woo needs to be looked at. The comic has always been a bit skeevy but more recent strips are pushing things further.

We now have nudity on a middle schooler in a sexual context, for one thing (comic #712). There was another iffy strip in which Woo stripped Sandra, and another arc in which a middle school boy gets an erection by staring at his bikini-clad friends, don't have strip numbers right now but will try to get them soon. Ads for the comic on other sites tend to highlight bikini-clad strips.

The comic is geared towards adult/mature audiences considering its sexual situations and occasional coarse language.

Having read the entire comic, I really think you're overstating both the amount of fanservicey material and its intent. I haven't seen anything that struck me as unnecessarily inappropriate or out of character for a Slice of Life comic about kids in their early to mid-teens, with the possible exception of that one strip where Woo basically ate Sandra's clothes, and even then that was clearly being played for crude comedy. The current arc is the diciest thing the comic's presented to date in terms of content, but the intent is "incredibly boneheaded teenage stunt goes horribly awry", as the end of the strip in question and subsequent ones have proven.

edited 2nd Sep '15 10:30:33 PM by Willbyr

Add in that the nudity is never shown on screen and all you see are shoulders and this is coming across more as young teen fucks up in an exaggerated parody of the way real young teens fuck up.

This. The way this arc is presented, I'm fully expecting her door to be battered down by FBI swat teams any second now :P. There's no way this is being presented as titillation.

I was going through the Visual Novel index and saw that Battle Goddess is described as "a series of hentai RP Gs" and Critical Point, upon some research, has some rather XXX-looking sex scenes. I didn't see either on the P5 decisions list, were they ever reviewed?

I don't see any reason why Critical Point would need a review, just looking at its trope page. It seems to be a mystery that happens to include sex scenes. Is there a character of questionable age involved?

Looking it up its a Hard Military Science Fiction Mystery Murder set on a spaceship. Everyone is a military officer from the looks of it and everyone looks well above age.

Battle Goddess is one of the many turn based Record Of Agarest War SRPG Clones with sexual content.

edited 10th Sep '15 9:48:33 PM by Memers

I think I remember reading most of Critical Point before getting bored. After awhile it got really repetitive. Anyway, from what I recall, the youngest female character is still an adult and looks it, though she does look younger than most of the rest of the women in the cast. She was about eighteen or so? The VN was made long enough ago that she's treated like she's really young and that it's kind of morally questionable for the protagonist to sleep with her whereas nowadays she'd actually be older than average. So, safe there. And I think the total amount of sexual content, while high, was not really enough for it to be considered porn.

edited 10th Sep '15 9:48:20 PM by Arha

With Battle Goddess, that entry for The Jailbait Wait does kind of concern me a little. Is the apostle in question having sex?

edited 11th Sep '15 10:45:36 AM by Ramidel

I'd like to bring Inferno MOO to this thread's attention. It's a clone of a game called HellMOO, which was cut a few years ago for graphic sexual content including pedophilia. This version seems to lack the pedo stuff, but is still highly sexual in nature.

edited 17th Sep '15 4:08:14 PM by HarmoniousFusion

Note: I'm not the author. I just moved it from the main namespace. I know next to nothing about InfernoMOO except what it says on the page. Before the inevitable "let's ask the author of the page about this game." conversation happens.

edited 22nd Sep '15 7:05:54 AM by TheOneWhoTropes