It doesn't illustrate the trope very well. In fact, it's a pretty classic Just A Face And A Caption, since without the caption to explain that 1) they're cousins and 2) that he's "checking out his cousin's breasts", it simply looks like a female lecturing a male and him avoiding her eyes.
So I'd say that it doesn't matter whether it's canon or not, it's a bad page image.
edited 9th Aug '11 4:39:34 PM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.If the page image needs to get the relationship across, we'd probably need to whip up a family tree.
There's this◊ in the examples list...it'd need to be arranged vertically and would be a little off-balance because of that. Beyond that, I'd be fine with this one not having a pic.
Awkward...
First key to interpreting a work: Things mean things.EDIT: Nevermind, posted in the wrong thread.
edited 9th Aug '11 8:31:38 PM by Willbyr
Agree that the Ben 10 pic is bad, I suspect Hatedom activity. Or perverts. Whatever.
Fight smart, not fair.Either would be fine with me.
Would a family tree be preferable to text? Something like this◊, for instance? (Not proposing that particular example, just the concept).
The important thing, I think, is the interrelatedness, not who was who. So I played with it a little to highlight that.
edited 11th Aug '11 8:32:28 AM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.I actually don't like the Charles II example because of all the uncle/niece marriages, which aren't this trope. I just thought a family tree would be the best way of visually demonstrating incest (not a noun phrase I thought I'd ever use), and that was the first example I could think of.
I like it, although to make it trope-specific we may want to just highlight the cousin marriages.
edited 11th Aug '11 9:39:41 AM by Willbyr
It would be easy enough to take out the purple lines and just leave the cousin marriages.
edited 11th Aug '11 10:55:45 AM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.I like it.
Is there a more general trope the one with the purple lines would be good on?
edited 11th Aug '11 10:59:39 AM by INUH
Infinite Tree: an experimental storyIt would work on Tangled Family Tree, but that has what I think is an excellent page image already.
edited 11th Aug '11 11:36:18 AM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.Yeah, that one's even better.
Infinite Tree: an experimental storyAlternate caption: "Something may be wrong when you only have eight different people as your five-times-great grandparents on your mother's side."
edited 11th Aug '11 11:37:03 AM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.x5 Looks good; is a little clunky, but it works.
Any objections to this?
edited 1st Sep '11 9:30:14 AM by Willbyr
Looks good to me.
First key to interpreting a work: Things mean things.Add a hottip saying that there should be 64 different people at the five-times-greatgrandparent level.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.Done. Small text or regular-size?
Man, this should've been wrapped up a long time back. The family tree pic and caption are up and tagged; locking up.
The reason given was: "Deleted the Ben 10 example, since it's not canon. Incest Subtext and Incest Yay Shipping are better fitting."
]]
What's to be done?
edited 9th Aug '11 4:34:40 PM by Vox