Follow TV Tropes

Following

Why do we allow JAFAAC?: Image Links Wiki

Go To

nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#1: Apr 15th 2011 at 12:31:26 PM

I thought the point of this was for tropes tat can be visually displayed so much that they would clog up the main page. Why do we allow JAFAAC?

Ultimatum Disasturbator from Second Star to the left (Old as dirt) Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
Disasturbator
#2: Apr 15th 2011 at 12:45:49 PM

They are not being displayed,they are being linked to,there is a difference.

New theme music also a box
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#3: Apr 15th 2011 at 12:47:01 PM

Yeah, that applies to page pictures that illustrate a trope. Image links just wants examples.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#4: Apr 15th 2011 at 4:00:42 PM

The Image Links section is something I've always thought of as an Example Section, but with images, rather than the description.

Fight smart, not fair.
nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#5: May 27th 2011 at 3:49:53 PM

I'm surprised that this died off so quickly. Anyway, if we can put up random images that do not illustrate a trope, what is the point then?

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#6: May 27th 2011 at 5:47:30 PM

To show any example in picture form, and have them not buried in the main page examples where most don't have any picture links.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#7: May 27th 2011 at 6:07:13 PM

[up] Do you mean an example of the trope? like what the trope page pictures are for.

edited 27th May '11 6:07:19 PM by captainpat

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#8: May 27th 2011 at 6:09:11 PM

They aren't held to the same high standard as the page image, because the extra information isn't limited to what can be put in the caption box, and the picture isn't expected to do the job at first glance.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#9: May 27th 2011 at 6:19:02 PM

[up] But should they still illustrate the trope to some degree?

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#10: May 27th 2011 at 6:45:56 PM

Yes. Of course.

But there are a lot of tropes that are about something that isn't easily picturable with some explanation to give it context, like an emotional state.

Take this one. Is she illustrating Oh, Crap!? Cloud Cuckoolander? Puppydog Eyes? Moe? Blue Screen Of Death? It could be anyone of those, just going by the picture. Now, add a couple of sentences explaining the context, and it's ok. It's not great, but it's ok. Page images should not just be "OK". They should be good, if not great. Page Images have to work as a single image.

Image Links pages are collections of images. The fact that they're collections means that they can prop each other up to a degree.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Add Post

Total posts: 10
Top