Follow TV Tropes

Following

Fox news editor openly caught slanting the story

Go To

mmysqueeant I'm A Dirty Cowboy from Essairrrrcks Since: Oct, 2010
I'm A Dirty Cowboy
#2: Dec 16th 2010 at 2:05:04 AM

Predict shit-storm in three...two...

QUICKLY someone say something about MSNBC so it looks like tvtropes is fair and balanced.

CommandoDude They see me troll'n from Cauhlefohrnia Since: Jun, 2010
They see me troll'n
#3: Dec 16th 2010 at 2:45:31 AM

Dude, nothing new, they've had people tell their pundits how best to trick the audience into believing their bs. And the memos have been out.

Fox news is build of lies.

My other signature is a Gundam.
Pentadragon The Blank from Alternia Since: Jan, 2001
#4: Dec 16th 2010 at 3:56:13 AM

Disregard.

edited 16th Dec '10 4:11:09 AM by Pentadragon

LaPetiteMort Since: Nov, 2010
#5: Dec 16th 2010 at 4:50:31 AM

The best part is how their audience will keep eating the bullshit Fox is feeding them like nothing happened at all.

Live by the sword, live a good long time
Uchuujinsan Since: Oct, 2009
#6: Dec 16th 2010 at 4:57:39 AM

Uhh.. what's so special about that (refering to op)? It would be news to me that there are established information media who DON'T do this. The only difference is imho that you think the oppinion that gets supported there is retarded.

edited 16th Dec '10 4:57:59 AM by Uchuujinsan

Pour y voir clair, il suffit souvent de changer la direction de son regard www.xkcd.com/386/
Roman Love Freak Since: Jan, 2010
#7: Dec 16th 2010 at 5:24:03 AM

Fox News lost their plausible deniability years ago. Now, everyone knows they are deliberately slanted and that's how their viewers like it.

| DA Page | Sketchbook |
Bur Chaotic Neutral from Flyover Country Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Not war
#8: Dec 16th 2010 at 7:19:58 AM

Umm... all news networks slant their stories to appeal more to their audience. Not just Fox. MSNBC, CBS, CNN. All do it. Duh. This isn't news.

edited 16th Dec '10 7:20:45 AM by Bur

i. hear. a. sound.
RadicalTaoist scratching at .8, just hopin' from the #GUniverse Since: Jan, 2001
scratching at .8, just hopin'
mmysqueeant I'm A Dirty Cowboy from Essairrrrcks Since: Oct, 2010
I'm A Dirty Cowboy
#10: Dec 16th 2010 at 7:35:37 AM

[up] I'd also figure climate scientists would know to be more discreet. Never stopped them though, and now look at the state of the bloody Global Warming debate. Baw, it's a cabal of evil scientists etc. etc.

Yeah, I suppose it is significant that slanting has actually been recorded from the editor. Obviously everyone knows it's slanted in any case. Hard to imagine the editor not knowing what was going on, endorsing and pushing that agenda.

Is this one of the 'big' Fox news dudes or is it some local spin-off Fox news? I have no idea which are which, who has responsibility for whose actions etc., I keep hearing about local 'Fox' news anchors who have nothing (k, little) to do with Fox at all.

breadloaf Since: Oct, 2010
#11: Dec 16th 2010 at 8:14:03 AM

Umm... all news networks slant their stories to appeal more to their audience. Not just Fox. MSNBC, CBS, CNN. All do it. Duh. This isn't news.

No?

Maybe, that is how it is in America, but in other countries that's illegal and causes you to get shut down by the regulatory agency for lying.

EnglishIvy Since: Aug, 2011
#12: Dec 16th 2010 at 8:28:50 AM

Networks are allowed to lie. In fact, it was a case against Fox that created that precedent.

Uchuujinsan Since: Oct, 2009
#13: Dec 16th 2010 at 8:39:54 AM

^^
Well, depends - but in this case they didn't exactly ask to lie. But the chief of a news outlet will always influence how something gets reported, with or without lies. And that isn't illegal.

Pour y voir clair, il suffit souvent de changer la direction de son regard www.xkcd.com/386/
Karkadinn Karkadinn from New Orleans, Louisiana Since: Jul, 2009
Karkadinn
#14: Dec 16th 2010 at 8:40:32 AM

Everyone already knows Fox News is a lying liar that lies. The only people who don't are those who choose to willingly disregard being lied to because it fits their world view. And for those people, no amount of evidence is sufficient, because they'll always justify it by saying the other networks are just as bad, regardless of whether it's true or not.

Bottom line: Fox is no longer CAPABLE of losing face from things like this, because it has already lost as much credibility as it is possible for an organization to lose through its own actions.

Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.
EnglishIvy Since: Aug, 2011
#15: Dec 16th 2010 at 8:41:50 AM

And yet people still treat it as a valid news source, instead of on the same level as Weekly World News.

edited 16th Dec '10 9:05:21 AM by EnglishIvy

thatguythere47 Since: Jul, 2010
#16: Dec 16th 2010 at 9:00:14 AM

I think infotainment is a more appropriate word for Fox.

I don't know why you're getting up in arms over "slanting" facts. Fox news makes shit up on a regular basis. See: Inserting footage of Sarah Palin's rallies when talking about the huge line ups for her book.

Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?
pvtnum11 OMG NO NOSECONES from Kerbin low orbit Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: We finish each other's sandwiches
OMG NO NOSECONES
#17: Dec 16th 2010 at 9:32:11 AM

Even NPR does this to an extent. How much they do it or not is debatable. I'd like to think that NPR does it less than others.

Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.
breadloaf Since: Oct, 2010
#18: Dec 16th 2010 at 12:47:16 PM

Yeah but it's not binary. It isn't "biased and not biased", it's a varying level of bias. There's a difference between say BBC speaking with a British perspective versus someone deliberating attempting to sabotage a debate by explicitly telling their journalists to insert weasel words to skew the dialogue.

Yamikuronue So Yeah Since: Aug, 2009
#19: Dec 16th 2010 at 12:48:46 PM

When the viewpoint of a huge portion of Fox's viewer base is "batshit insane and in denial about reality" (see, for example, Birthers)...

Fox gives us the "Parallel universe where we're actually right and the facts are wrong" perspective.

edited 16th Dec '10 12:49:14 PM by Yamikuronue

BTW, I'm a chick.
pvtnum11 OMG NO NOSECONES from Kerbin low orbit Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: We finish each other's sandwiches
OMG NO NOSECONES
#20: Dec 16th 2010 at 12:53:41 PM

I like it when I manage to snag the BBC stuff on Hawaii Public Radio. Different issues, different perspectives.

Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.
breadloaf Since: Oct, 2010
#21: Dec 16th 2010 at 1:59:28 PM

Al Jazeera is becoming quite popular these days, it's even coming to Canada. It's basically a BBC spinoff with some CBC (chief editor went to there) added in. I like different perspectives, gives you more information on any event.

feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#22: Dec 16th 2010 at 4:46:29 PM

I know there are going to be people who call this a stupid question, but how unbalanced is Fox's news? As of three or four years ago, they kept a strong division between their pundits (who were openly biased) and their news sources (which one study described as the least biased among American television-based news providers, albeit still biased.)

edited 16th Dec '10 4:46:53 PM by feotakahari

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
breadloaf Since: Oct, 2010
#23: Dec 16th 2010 at 5:12:39 PM

Well it's not banned or anything but it is not allowed to be called news around here. It's specifically entertainment and I think that is similar to everywhere else. People who pirate American signals can get Fox News, but most other countries, from what I can tell, don't normally carry it.

The internationally trusted new sources are BBC, Al Jazeera, France 24, Al-Arabiya and CNN. There might be some other less well known ones, but those are the big ones.

MajorTom Eye'm the cutest! Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Eye'm the cutest!
#24: Dec 16th 2010 at 5:26:28 PM

^^ Their news reporting is pretty neutral on most things. Especially if they have alternative source assistance like from say the Associated Press.

"Allah may guide their bullets, but Jesus helps those who aim down the sights."
Karkadinn Karkadinn from New Orleans, Louisiana Since: Jul, 2009
Karkadinn
#25: Dec 16th 2010 at 5:39:10 PM

{Kep threads separate, please, and don't bring sniping from one into another. —Madrugada}

Yeah, they're real neutral. Little flubs like reporting a 200 million dollar daily expenditure for the president's trip to India, those are just flukes. It's not like Fox News habitually misrepresents anyone and anything that isn't aligned with its agenda in the name of getting higher ratings.

edited 17th Dec '10 7:54:13 AM by Madrugada

Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.

Total posts: 78
Top