Follow TV Tropes

Following

North Korea

Go To

AngelusNox The law in the night from somewhere around nothing Since: Dec, 2014 Relationship Status: Married to the job
The law in the night
#6201: Aug 11th 2017 at 8:39:07 AM

South Korean/Japan relationship despise China and NK have always been cold and Japan has some clear issues with more nuclear armed countries being close to it.

Specially with the right wing party of Japan stroking some sore wounds in South Korean history.

Inter arma enim silent leges
Trivialis Since: Oct, 2011
#6202: Aug 11th 2017 at 8:50:00 AM

Japan's top priority is and should be not South Korean nukes under US oversight but the plainly obvious North Korean nukes. Japan is well aware of why South Korea wants greater defenses and following its example is going to override any notion of deterring it from doing so.

edited 11th Aug '17 8:50:30 AM by Trivialis

Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#6203: Aug 11th 2017 at 8:51:09 AM

The nationalists in Japan, or anywhere really, aren't renown for being sensible.

edited 11th Aug '17 8:51:59 AM by Rationalinsanity

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
TerminusEst from the Land of Winter and Stars Since: Feb, 2010
#6204: Aug 11th 2017 at 9:03:06 AM

Nukes in Japan are political suicide. Depends on who wants to take the hit.

Si Vis Pacem, Para Perkele
LushHoggett Since: Apr, 2017
#6205: Aug 11th 2017 at 10:40:10 AM

and i really don't think Japan would every agree with North Korea. as they really just want North Korea not to have any Nukes and also they really don't share that good of a history with North Korea too. and they are allies to south Korea has well

TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#6206: Aug 11th 2017 at 11:27:27 AM

More nukes in the region would likely make everyone unhappy overall. Though to a certain point I can see the South Korean's desire for one as MAD for the Korean Peninsula.

Who watches the watchmen?
Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#6207: Aug 11th 2017 at 12:09:03 PM

I could see South Korea going the UK/France route and getting a few nuclear armed subs.

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
FFShinra Since: Jan, 2001
#6208: Aug 11th 2017 at 4:14:32 PM

I keep wondering if the Guam thing is a feint on NK's part. Make the US focus there so it can hit something a little easier or more accurately....like SK or Japan....

LushHoggett Since: Apr, 2017
#6209: Aug 11th 2017 at 5:07:10 PM

That would a clever plot form North Korea.

TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#6210: Aug 11th 2017 at 6:31:02 PM

I think it is unlikely it is a feint. South Korea still has missile defenses and local US military presence. It wouldn't work very well for Japan either. They have means to protect themselves as well. To top it off pretty much any Aegis equipped US vessel with at least one SM-3 can possibly intercept the long range missiles.

Chances are good it is more blustering and Un may have taken up a favorite past time, trolling Trump.

Who watches the watchmen?
MorningStar1337 Like reflections in the glass! from 🤔 Since: Nov, 2012
Like reflections in the glass!
#6211: Aug 11th 2017 at 6:45:52 PM

[up]a pastime shared by many

edited 11th Aug '17 6:47:06 PM by MorningStar1337

LushHoggett Since: Apr, 2017
#6212: Aug 11th 2017 at 7:33:15 PM

so you think North Korea is lying to upset Trump

Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#6213: Aug 11th 2017 at 7:36:02 PM

North Korea, or more accurately the Kim regime, wants to be avoid getting the Iraq/Libya treatment. To that end, they want to threaten the US and its Asian allies just enough to get them to back off. The unpredictable factor here is that you have the least competent and most impulsive man in the Oval Office in living memory.

edited 11th Aug '17 7:50:20 PM by Rationalinsanity

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
LushHoggett Since: Apr, 2017
#6214: Aug 11th 2017 at 7:49:52 PM

so is that way they threaten everyone and also i guess we will have to wait and see if a theory is right

Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#6215: Aug 11th 2017 at 7:51:04 PM

Yeah, non-great power deterrence taken up to a never before seen level.

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#6216: Aug 11th 2017 at 8:13:46 PM

I am sure deliberately agitating Trump has crossed many world leaders minds.

Though it is a good point the Kim's MO is dangerous and aggressive brinksmanship.

Who watches the watchmen?
M84 Oh, bother. from Our little blue planet Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Oh, bother.
#6217: Aug 11th 2017 at 8:16:50 PM

They've lasted this long with a gun pointed at the ROK's head and the tacit backing of China. Now they've got a bigger gun and they're pointing it at everyone else. Far higher risks, but higher possible rewards.

Disgusted, but not surprised
SgtRicko Since: Jul, 2009
#6218: Aug 11th 2017 at 9:55:59 PM

As I've stated here earlier, I'm not worried about Guam suffering a direct hit, let alone the surrounding FSM and CNMI islands. I'm fairly certain the missile defenses will work. Rather, it's the radioactive fallout contaminating sections of the ocean, and the inevitable hysteria that will follow which is capable of far more damage in the long term. Most of the Marianas relies heavily upon tourism from Asia to thrive, and the lesser-developed island nations still sustain themselves with fishing. Guam? Not so much, in regard to the food. We're pretty Americanized here, and most of our food is imported. We still need tourism badly though.

But what happens if news starts spreading about even the smallest traces of radioactive dust or contaminated water approaching the islands? Well, remember how much panic spread during the Fukushima-Daichi disaster? People started panicking about irradiated fish as far as California (despite it turning out to be nothing more than a false alarm), and that had a big impact on communities that relied upon fishing. It wouldn't take long before some idiot meme posted on Facebook or some other outlet releases a grossly exaggerated claim that "ALL PACIFIC WATER IS NOW CONTAMINATED!!!!1111", and there goes the economy. That'll probably put a serious dent in the annual tourist numbers.

@Lush: There isn't anything fake about how Trump's lack of nuance is making things worse. While it's wholly possible the Norks are just doing the usual saber-rattling with no intention to actually strike, there's also the risk that the upper echelons of their government might've finally be "poisoned" by their own propaganda/ideology and seriously think an outright war is necessary. Don't believe me? How do you think media outfits like Breitbart, the Tea Party, and ultimately Trump came into being? Because folks actually believed the hogwash and acted upon it.

Plus... the U.S. gains literally nothing from invading North Korea. They lack any worthwhile resources, the political situation there would be nightmarish to deal with once we captured Pyongyang, China and Russia are likely to deliberate screw things up to weaken the U.S., the mass exodus of fleeing North Korean refugees would overwhelm both the South and China, and the reconstruction costs would be ASTRONOMICAL (seriously, some parts of that country may as well be in a time capsule from before the 1940s!) I firmly believe that taking the neutral stance and ignoring N.K.'s constant attention-grabbing is the best possible solution.

edited 12th Aug '17 6:59:38 AM by SgtRicko

Protagonist506 from Oregon Since: Dec, 2013 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
#6219: Aug 11th 2017 at 10:25:47 PM

If North Korea is attempting to scare the US into leaving them alone, then they have a very bad strategy. Thing is, there actually is such a thing as bad publicity in this context.

"Any campaign world where an orc samurai can leap off a landcruiser to fight a herd of Bulbasaurs will always have my vote of confidence"
Ominae (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#6220: Aug 11th 2017 at 10:34:56 PM

China mentioned via Global Times that Pyongyang is on its own if they strike at Guam unless the Americans or some other country shot first.


The JASDF has deployed the Patriots to Shimane and Hiroshima with the JMSDF sending out its Aegis cruisers.

TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#6221: Aug 12th 2017 at 5:26:54 AM

Cross Posted from the Military Thread Courtesy of Taira Mai

South Korea will allow deployment of Full THAAD Battery

South Korea has changed course to allow deployment of a full THAAD anti-missile battery south of Seoul to counter the growing threat from North Korea, the Pentagon said Friday.

New South Korean President Moon Jae-in had held up placement of a full battery of six THAAD launchers after two launchers were installed. Moon said the full battery would be kept on hold pending an environmental review, but South Korean officials said Thursday that the THAAD placement and the environmental review would be conducted simultaneously.

“The conclusion of the small-scale environmental effect assessment and the initiation of temporary deployment are not in a cause-and-effect relationship,” Moon Sang-gyun, spokesman at the Ministry of National Defense, said Thursday. “They will go separately.”

He added, “The deployment of four additional THAAD launchers will be pursued after consultations are done between South Korea and the U.S,” South Korea’s Yonhap news agency reported

edited 12th Aug '17 5:27:18 AM by TuefelHundenIV

Who watches the watchmen?
CaptainCapsase from Orbiting Sagittarius A* Since: Jan, 2015
#6222: Aug 12th 2017 at 6:24:43 AM

@Protagonist: On the other hand, North Korea is the last Stalinist regime left standing. That speaks to a certain resilience, if nothing else.

edited 12th Aug '17 6:24:55 AM by CaptainCapsase

Silasw A procrastination in of itself from A handcart to hell (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#6223: Aug 12th 2017 at 6:40:14 AM

Thing is North Korea has survived this long by antagonising US regimes that understand that actions have consequences, with the consequences of even a swift (China sanctioned) first strike on North Korea being to horrible for anyone to want to deal with. The current US regime doesn't totally understand that actions have consequences, they don't really get cause and effect.

“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
LushHoggett Since: Apr, 2017
#6224: Aug 12th 2017 at 6:47:51 AM

You know whats crazy i never knew about Guam until North Korea threaten

FFShinra Since: Jan, 2001
#6225: Aug 12th 2017 at 9:18:46 AM

Trolling Trump is not useful in this case because unless they actually act on their words, Trump gets to claim victory for scaring Kim into submission.

Also, when I meant attacking someone else, I didn't necessarily mean a missile strike (at least with SK).

But let's see what happens Tuesday. Maybe nothing happens, maybe NK gets annihilated.


Total posts: 7,599
Top