Why does the Council reduce your monthly rank every time you fail to shoot down the Overseer UFO? The damn thing has always been there, it's just your radars couldn't pick it up until the plot upgrade; so essentially they're saying "you can now detect this new UFO. We're VERY DISAPPOINTED IN YOU."
There is a known UFO. Just because you didn't know about it before is no excuse. Essentially, each month you are letting that UFO go, you are giving that UFO free reign over humanity. You could make same claim that "UFO were zipping over country X until you got a satellite over it, guess we can forgive you not intercepting them now".
Is it a good idea for XCOM to welcome a Triad member into their ranks? Buddha only knows what Zhang has done in his criminal career before he found this alien artifact that XCOM was desperate to get their hands on.
A skilled and effective soldier willing to work with them is nothing to sneeze at, especially when you're facing the end of the world due to an alien invasion.
Especially one who took the initiative to successfully hunt down a black-ops group like XCOM.
HE contacted XCOM offering an alien artefact free of charge, and then offered his services. Whatever he did before, he's clean as snow for xeno-busting duty.
Why is Zhang a heavy? I wouldn't think the Triad has a lot of use for rocket launchers and M60s. It'd make more sense for him to be assault or sniper class.
Especially since he one-shots a Sectoid with a conventional pistol in his introduction, something only a Gunslinger-specced Sniper should be capable of.
Or he is part of the Southeast Asian Triads, where they tend to fight pirates and coast guards armed with military grade guns.
He might also be ex-military (Matching his higher starting rank). Not unheard off for ex-military types to join criminal organizations.
More annoying with Enemy Within, because you can't send him on infiltration runs, even though that's something he should be very good at.
Considering who he's betrayed, his old employers have no doubt been looking for him and sending out feelers on that front, and the aliens through the thin men. He's too (in)famous to keep a low profile.
What did the Uber Ethereal want to happen in the final mission? It seems dismayed when you kill it, but it also sounds like it expects you to win and says it's doubting if you're worthy when it kills someone. What part of the final mission didn't the uber ethereal expect to happen?
Presumably, the part where XCOM keeps trying to kill them even after the true purpose of the invasion is revealed and they're offered top lackey status. I'm guessing they simply expected humanity to submit to their rule after our importance to their plans is revealed.
Well there's apparently a Bigger Bad coming, and the Uber Ethereal was counting on humanity's assistance against it. Killing it and destroying the Temple Ship may have been our Nice Job Breaking It, Hero moment.
It is clear that all of the rooms leading up to the final chamber are part of some sort of "murder your worthless predecessors" test; perhaps the Uber Ethereal expected XCOM to cease firing once they finally met face-to-face. Alternatively, being a hive-mind, the Ethereals see humans as interchangeable, and are only interested in XCOM proving humanity's worth, rather than specifically setting out to abduct whatever team you send against them. Once you kill all their underlings, the Ethereals intend to wipe XCOM out in the final confrontation, and are obviously dismayed to have underestimated their enemy's strength.
In the vein of "underestimating their enemy's strength", it could be that the Big Bad expected to be able to mind-control the Volunteer, only to discover that, ha, no, humanity is stronger than that. Subjugating species doesn't seem to be a difficult thing for them, after all.
Perhaps the Volunteer was being helped by Asaru.
And why are the Ethereals so determined to "collect" a species that has both Physical toughness AND Psionic powers if the whole point is for them to "transcend" beyond the former anyway?
They're searching for the perfect species to use against the "Greater Threat," whatever that means. Their "uplifting" is us joining them as their servants; we'd still be gaining access to the benefits they have to offer us, which they consider a fair trade for our servitude.
And while I'm at it, why don't they just use the Sectoids for whatever they have planned? They're capable of using Psionic powers, and despite what the High One claims, they're actually about on-par with humans in terms of toughness, as while they do have less health than your troopers, your troops are armoured and they're not. Unarmored humans (like Regular civilians) have the same amount of health as a Sectoid.
The Sectoids are extremely physically frail; they'd never be able to lift more than like 60 pounds and are useless without their psionics. Humans are by far the superior species, as they combine their strengths (strong psionic potential) with none of the weaknesses). All they need is to be tamed, as the other species were.
This goes for other species as well. Thin Men are physically and mentally adept, but have no psionic potential. Besides the fact that Mutons aren't gifted, they're pretty much Dumb Muscle and are incapable of brilliance, requiring constant supervision. The Ethereals are looking for a species that is both physically and psionically strong and can operate independently, as they hope to just give the tools, point them at the enemy, and have them win. The whole invasion is testing if we fit the bill, and considering the success of XCOM, we do.
It isn't an issue of simple physical ability and psionic power. The Sectoids didn't succeed at the Ethereals' trials, so they were a failure.
Operation: Devil's Moon (Tutorial Mission)
In the tutorial mission, at one point you encounter a brainwashed German soldier. The curious thing is, it seems to be a normal Sectoid doing the brainwashing, and not a Commander. Aren't the Commanders the only Sectoids capable of brainwashing?
All Sectoids are psychic in the remake.
That is a commander, the good doctor infers the second time that you meet a commander and get to kill it at the alien base that they may be one and the same. Only commanders have mind control (the rest can just link minds with another sectoid to beef them up.)
It's very clearly a commander. They have a more veiny apparent, their cranium being all red streaked and having a blood colored glow, while the conventional ones are pure smooth gray with a more yellow inner glow.
The Sectoids are probably the least problematic part of the first tutorial. What are Bradford and the men thinking? Rushing into fog of war, not using flank protection, approaching an armed and unresponsive man? The calamity that was the first mission could've been wholly avoided.
In regards to the "approaching and armed and unresponsive man", at this point there is absolutely no reason to believe in mind control, psionic powers, or any of the other science fiction gimmicks. At this point, as well, Germany is at least a member of the X-Com program. Also, he is not unresponsive (They get Vahlen to translate his cries for help) and none of the team members are shown to speak German. So is it normal in the real world to treat an allied, likely injured, foreign language speaking, ally calling for help as a hostile combatant?
They were using flank protection; the first soldier to get killed is the one covering the left flank. They approached the "armed and unresponsive" man because he was both calling for help and they didn't know about Sectoid mind control at the time. They also wisely kept the rest of the team back to cover the soldier moving to assist the German soldier, but the Sectoids attacked at the same time as the mind-controlled soldier opened fire.
No they quite blatantly were not using flank protection. They might have killed the man *on* the left flank, but said man was never *covering* it with the intention of shooting any flankers (which is basically what Overwatch *is*). Secondly, not knowing about Sectoid mind control is one thing. Approaching an armed, unresponsive man from the front while throwing out all doctrine and training is another. For all they knew, he could've been suicidal or in shock and liable to snap and kill anyone approaching (which was more or less what happened, if not by his choice). Also, while I can give them props for holding the rest back, they were in no way covering him because-again- of the lack of Overwatch.
Bradford is never given command of another mission after Berlin in the tutoral, it's all in the hands of the commander. He is apparently a good administrator and awful at tactics.
Lack of Overwatch is more of a result of moving in too quickly. Not moving into Overwatch is, in the abstraction that is the game mechanics of the game, a result of the soldiers spending too much time moving and not enough time stopping to cover their flanks. If it were all happening in real time, what we would have seen would be the soldiers advancing, and right as they get to cover the soldier would open fire and the sectoids would jump out and start shooting. Note that Bradford never explicitly orders the soldiers to run out like that; the tutorial forces them to move in that manner, while Bradford actually gives the squad explicit orders to be cautious. So the blame for the poor tactics would likely fall on the soldiers in question, not Bradford himself. (so, in traditional X-Com fashion, the rookies got themselves killed.)
Actually no and no; there's a thing called Command Responsibility. Even if we assume that Bradford wasn't transmitting the movement orders to the team (and thus that the game grid is completely on the other side of the fourth wall without any in-universe presence) he certainly had oversight of the mission. As a result, while he does give lip service to having them move cautiously, he notably does *not* intervene to set them straight when they act like they do. That alone would be enough to hang him by the short and curlies in front of an inquest asking why the heck three out of four men sent in died.
X-COM may have not entirely been in the mindset of a war, that is, not expecting everything suspicious to be a threat, ROE and all that
This is so wrong on so many levels. Not the least of which being it's not just *war* that discourages you from doing things like running up to an unresponsive armed person in distress. Secondly, X-COM is not merely a military outfit, it is a special operations outfit activated only to deal with potential alien attack. They should not have any other mindset than war. Thirdly, they just stumbled across *Dead, Mutilated German Bundsheer* 'all around the outside.' If they weren't on a war footing then, they damn well should have been by the time they saw those.
Now, I could be wrong, but isn't Bradford a communications officer? Who put Nyota Uhura in charge of tactical?
Bradford is the second-in-command of XCOM, not a communications officer.
I understand that this is for the sake of gameplay, but still: How does my Skyranger, after flying half-way across the world (and perhaps me dallying around a bit in my base), always manage to show up for bomb defusing missions just in the nick of time?
I'd love to know how they built a VTOL craft with the aerodynamics of a good sized barn that can cross the world in about three hours, loiter, and then return, on one tank of gas. Without alien tech, to boot.
Aerial refueling and Lockheed C-130 Hercules. However scrambling the tanker on a moment's notice and VTOL part is indeed stretching it... but once those are solved it can be done.
Perhaps the aliens attempt to activate the bomb early when they see you land?
Considering the whole point of the game is a test for humanity, it's not unthinkable that they intentionally use a system that has exposed, distant, power nodes that they activate soon before you land to give you a chance to stop them.
For a multilateral intelligence agency with a strike force apparently comprised of the most elite soldiers, why in the world can X-COM only afford a single Skyranger?
Just making a wild guess here, but perhaps there's literally only one Skyranger in existence? Given its capabilities, it might be a Super Prototype built in one of the Council nations. XCOM probably doesn't have the facilities to build more inside their underground HQ and its Council nation of origin isn't building more due to alien attacks or because the production line intended for the Skyranger was used for something else. Still, this is a wild guess with no real evidence to back it up.
Governments tend to be very wary of letting anything that isn't a government use military force—that's why the UN doesn't have its own army, for example. Maintaining support for XCOM already requires serious political maneuvering by member nations' heads of state, which is why member states are so willing to leave when they don't feel XCOM is serving their interests well enough. Letting an NGO maintain *one* high-tech, hypersonic troop transport is already a huge strain; giving them a fleet would just be unthinkable.
For a good idea of how dangerous XCOM could be if they went rogue, imagine fighting basic EXALT soldiers with the best you have to offer. Conventional armies wouldn't have a ghost of a chance. The one bit of control the governments have is that X-COM only has one Skyranger.
Here's my question...why the HELL didn't they give it a nose gun? Or a tail-gun? Some sort of mounted weapon, like on a UH-60 or similar modern-day transport helicopter? The thing's big enough to house a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the nose...surely the troops being deployed from it could have used a bit of covering fire.
While it's certainly possible, XCOM's mandate isn't the indiscriminate destruction of alien troops. Not to mention that, while collateral damage isn't a big concern, you still don't want to be firing 40mm grenades or .50 caliber rounds in an urban setting. It would do more harm than good. XCOM is about saving the world, not destroying a significant part of it. Leave that for the aliens.
I wondered the same thing... but then I played the Tank Depot mission, and even a few missed Light Plasma shots exploded a tank. If the pinnacle of conventional armor tech can't protect a tank from the weapons that 70% of the aliens can outdamage, imagine what a sitting duck a huge target like the Skyranger would be. EXALT meanwhile has tons of rocket launchers. That's literally the soldiers' only lifeline out, and XCOM doesn't seem to have any replacements, so it's best to drop off soldiers and then stay out of the way.
Although, in associated fanfictions, I have seen Skyrangers supporting the soldiers they drop off with cannons and grenade launchers ...and often being shot down.
That one of the stronger reasons not to outfit the Skyranger with guns. If the aliens go and blow up the Skyranger, they get nothing at all (apart from killing a pilot and forcing XCOM to spend a bit more of their resources, but hardly more than a standard interceptor). But if you go and equip the Skyranger with a gun, things change, and that HUGE target turns to something to be taken down... and most likely a couple of shots with a plasma pistol will do.
So, uh, why is it called "Enemy Unknown"? We know who the enemy is pretty much the whole game.
The whole game is about understanding the invaders to defeat them. At the start all you know is that they are hostile and from space. Then you find out it's a group of genetically altered creatures.. The rest is spoilers, but enough said that you constantly learn more about the threat as the game goes on.
In meta terms: the original game was named "UFO: Enemy Unknown" in Europe, and "X-COM: UFO Defense" in the US. The remake combines both titles in a nice Continuity Nod.
How are the Thin Men supposed to be infiltration units? They would stick out like a sore thumb in a crowd with those Men in Black suits and odd proportions.
As the Men in Black movies/shows discuss, basic dress-suits are visually generic and lack unique identifying traits for witnesses.
Confirmed by MythBusters (indirectly): as long as you act appropriately, keep your distance and don't talk, you can pass yourself off as another specific person, not just "one of us".
So how, exactly, does the Council get information on these bombs being placed? I could understand X-COM itself having information on the abductions, landings, and terror attacks - that's what all the bridge bunnies are presumably scanning for - but why on earth would the Council be the first to know about these things?
Because it's their country that's being attacked. They generally know what's going on, even if they can't do anything about it. It's implied that the member nations are the ones who usually alert you to alien activity; Bradford frequently mentions during loading screens that you've received a "request for assistance" from whichever country you're heading in to.
Satellites only scan for UF Os. You can still find abductions and terror missions outside of your satellite range (and, indeed, can't find abductions inside your range) at any point. Assuming that the information on these missions doesn't come from the satellites, it probably comes from on-site contacts - police or civilians reporting abduction attempts, or news reports on terror strikes (as how the first terror mission is discovered).
Why are the member countries so outclassed that they need a single overworked strike force to clear out heavily populated centers which you would expect to be guarded? From the looks of things, it seems to take only a minor grasp of tactics and numbers to deal with the aliens. Is it that each countries' armies are actively tied up with the invaders and just need the occasional help?
The requests for advanced weapons and equipment from the Council nations that you can get does imply they're busy fighting the invaders. One of the maps (a badly wrecked tank depot with the corpses of soldiers scattered about) implies it's not going too well for them.
Keep in mind that Bradford's commentary while going into abduction missions is usually some variant of "[Country] has requested our help...." which indicates less that they absolutely need your help to fight all of the aliens but rather are calling in XCOM because conventional forces are overstretched, underequipped, or otherwise unable to get to the site to deal with it. Considering the scale and mobility of the aliens, it's not surprising that the funding nations would be having trouble covering all their bases.
Do you REALLY think that the aliens are launching coordinated, planned out attacks on an incredibly large population center, and only sending in 10, 15 troops? Hell, the military probably doesn't even need to show up to deal with those. Local shopkeepers could take them out with whatever weapons they had on hand. You're the best of the best, who can move quickly and flexibly. You don't have to deal with borders or national pride. For instance, how likely would Poland be to request military aid from Russia or Germany? You show up at a scene, go the the worst of the worst, and support local forces, rather than replace them. For things like abductions, crash-landings, and bomb defusals, it's halfway in between the country saying "We should just let the experts take care of it" and XCOM picking up radio chatter and saying "We're in charge now. We have incredibly advanced armor and plasma rifles. Anyone have anything to say about that?"
If you're talking about late game terror missions, conventionally equipped soldiers would be slaughtered. Note that even XCOM rookies are supposed to be "elite" soldiers, so I'd expect ordinary soldiers to have even less aim and will than a rookie, and be equipped with conventional gear to boot. They might be able to handle sectoids just fine, but floaters and particularly thin men would cut through them like a hot knife through butter, given that both would generally kill said soldiers in one hit, often take dozens (2-3 bursts) of conventional bullets to bring down, and are vastly more mobile than humans in general. That's not even getting into mid game aliens, most of which take at least two anti-tank missiles to bring down, and all of which have weapons with minimum damages high enough to guarantee a one hit kill on humans in conventional body armor. While I could buy conventional militaries gaining access to laser weapons and carapace armor by the time the late game hits, by that point, most of what the aliens are fielding would still kill them with single shots, and have armor more than capable of taking laser weaponry.
Raven Landing Process
To launch your Ravens, you need essentially to catapult them into the sky, through a very narrow tunnel hundreds of feet long, which is incredibly difficult. Thing is, there's no way they'd be able to land that way. So, just how do they get a Raven back into the base, considering the map shows the Raven returning to it?
Probably a runway outside the base, and they're then just transported back in.
If you look at the Raven's in the hangar, you'll see that it has a tilt-wing mechanism similar to a V-22 Osprey, with its wing engines pointed to the ground. This suggests that Ravens have VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) capability for use in landings. As to why they don't use said ability for takeoffs, military V/STO Ls (vertical/short take-off and landing) take off normally when laden with full combat loadout.
EXALT defeated forever? Warning: Spoilers
So, when you finally track down the EXALT base, you begin a raid that leaves with you capturing the base and eliminating its defenders. But wait, there are a few parts missing. What happened to their commander? The rest of the base personnel? Where are their genetics labs? You've taken out their command, sure, but apparently their leaders all escaped and the facility that produced the soldiers is still functional. Considering the resources of EXALT, it shouldn't be too long until they have another headquarters up and running. Sure, the files on their computers may have helped track down additional members, but considering how protective of secrets EXALT is, the files would likely have been wiped the moment XCOM breached the perimeter. So, I have to ask, how is this raid the final effort to kill EXALT for good?
Its not. Bradford explicitly says that there are remaining EXALT forces, but that taking out their headquarters has driven the survivors underground that they don't appear to be a threat any longer. More likely than not, whatever leadership remains (there's not likely much; the EXALT guys you kill at their headquarters likely are the entire leadership) either decided to lay low and try again at their goal later on, or they started fighting among themselves for control of the organization. If the organization is as centralized as the aftermath of the raid implies, taking out the organization's leadership likely fractured it, either fatally, or at least to the point that it can't do anything further during the course of the war.
True, but as I mentioned, it didn't seem like any of those EXALT operatives were their leadership, just regular combat personnel. Surely an organization as stately as their base implies wouldn't have their non-combat base staff dressed in combat gear, and it seems like the non-essential staff and leadership handily evacuated before XCOM landed, meaning that the leadership is still functional. The base that XCOM destroyed seemed to be only their command center; lacking their gene-lab, motor pool, or barracks, it's safe to assume that they're somewhere else and still functional. Of course you do disrupt their operations, but certainly a few more cells ought to pop up again.
They could go back at annoying XCOM, but at that point that line of action would be pure folly. Even if the player isn't really aggressive against them and made a lucky guess without many hints, they were defeated a number of times in open field, and then their base got raided. It'd take a LOT of time to regain the infrastructure they had before, and by that time, they'd be back to laser at best, with XCOM fielding psionics, plasma, all mutant teams, or paladin ME Cs, if EXALT is constantly outclassed by XCOM, at that point the difference would be suicidal to take on.
Ah, I see. Finally learning that Bullying a Dragon is a bad idea after finally being shown just how out of their league they are. Even with their fanaticism, they realize it'd be best to lie low now and try again later.
That's a good point: It could be that EXALT isn't going to be a problem for the rest of this war. But if the aliens show up again...
It's disappointing there weren't a few more missions that you could assault other bases and pick up more items & things like meld.
On that note, why does checking for EXALT's base in the country it isn't in piss off that country enough to make them leave the council?
No one likes to be accused of something they didn't do.
You're not just pointing fingers, you're preparing to launch an assault on that country's soil. As implied in other areas, the nations trust XCOM only with responding to alien activities, and are (rightfully) terrified of what damage you can do if you were to go rogue. So if you're accusing that nation, you're pretty much saying "expect an attack on some 'civilians' soon." If you're correct, the country begrudgingly allows you access, and if you're wrong, you both just threatened a country with your super-army and proved that you aren't as reliable as advertised, so they decide XCOM is a loose cannon they want no part of.
You're also accusing them of being complicit in treason against the whole human race. That's...kind of a big deal.