Follow TV Tropes

Live Blogs A Perfect Cliche Storm: Let's Read Adventurers Wanted
FreezairForALimitedTime2011-10-01 00:58:21

Go To


Fantasizing: An Introduction

Hello. My name is Freezair, and I am addicted to YA fantasy literature.

Ever since I was little, it's been clear that the universe I reside in isn't always this one. I'll be the first admit I'm somewhat escapist, or at the very least, I wouldn't mind a universe with a few more dragons in it. When I zoom past the literary fiction for the section draped in Franklin, Arthur, and Eloise, though, I at least have a passing excuse: I plan to make a career out of writing the stuff, so I have to do research! Research that you willingly and happily devote your time to is still research, after all.

This being the case, I consider myself a bit of a conessfrenchword of children's and young adults' fantasy. When you like fantasy of any kind, you have to be willing to accept certain things. Every genre has its own weak supports in the suspension bridge of disbelief, and fantasy is no exception. Chosen Ones? Kid Heroes? Elves and dwarves, sentient treasure, and that strange desperation which drives hero-collect-callers to look to other worlds besides their own for suitable champions are all common contrivances.

My disbelief floats around on a futuristic hoverboard, and very little can bring it down. I can ride out a Cliché Storm like a madman sitting on his porch with a camcorder in a tornado. No coincidence, no convenience, and contorted plot point will faze me. I happily indulge rip-offs, of everything from Tolkein to Rowling, in my hunger for more.

Or at least, I used to. Recently, I hit a bit of a... stumbling block.

As all regular readers know, some books are sentient, evil, and actively trying to break you. No—don't bother denying it; you know it in your heart of hearts yourself. The funny thing is, this is not always the same book to the same people. This particular book, for example, was obviously not as such to the people who published it, although it is for me.

This book is called Adventurers Wanted: Slathbog's Gold, with the subtitle implying that this is merely the first in a series. Oh my. The plot concerns a teenaged boy who is hired by an "adventuring company" to go to a mystic land and help a merry band of adventurers slay a dragon. While it sounds cliche, it does not immediately sound terrible. After all, a Cliché Storm can still be fun, provided it is not as deficient of style as it is of creativity. It's Not Supposed to Win Oscars—or Hugos, I suppose, as the case may be—it's supposed to be a fantasy romp. Nothin' inherently wrong with books-by-the-book.

But to pull of cliche well, you need other things besides the cliches to fall back upon. Stylish, syrupy prose that vanishes beneath you eyes like potato chips do in your mouth. Characters who stand out against a sea of cardboard cut-outs. A unique world. A fun concept. Just one of these can elevate your book above the level of yet another Extruded Book Product to a genuinely fun read.Tangent

This book, however, not only stuffs as many fantasy tropes as it can into its pages—the very first chapter reads like our own section on Fantasy imploded and was reassembled by a rudimentary AI—it couples them with some astoundingly doughy prose and dialogue. Add in a main character so milquetoast, you want to stuff him in a toaster over to crisp him up a little, and you have yourself what is commonly described in vernacular as a "hot mess."

Luckily, there is one surefire way to stave off the pain brought by these evil books: Sharing it. And that's precisely what I plan on doing.

Aren't you all lucky?

Comments

BonsaiForest Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 28th 2011 at 1:04:18 PM
Some things should just be handwaved or simply accepted, rather than trying to explain them. Alex mentioning that it's possible to sleep inside a Bag Of Holding and the lame explanation why he can't only makes readers wonder just why he doesn't?

A better explanation might have been "because goblins could pick up the bag and throw it in the water, and you'd drown." Or "it's impossible to climb back out of a bag of holding. It's not meant for living things." Or better yet, Alex should have just not asked the question. Wait, why did he ask a question anyway?
FreezairForALimitedTime Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 28th 2011 at 1:22:51 PM
You actually can go inside the Bags of Holding in this universe; they are meant to be traveled into by people. Which just makes the excuse all the lamer, especially when it seems like a perectly reasonable question.
Myrmidon Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 29th 2011 at 10:40:13 AM
I'm betting on Andy as the most likely Wizard canidate. Him or Alex.
SapphireBlue Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 29th 2011 at 12:15:39 PM
Actually, having the group sleep in a Bag Of Holding is a pretty ingenious idea. Just have one person outside the bag on lookout duty, and rotate every hour or so.

It honestly would've been better in this case if Alex hadn't asked the question at all. Then we wouldn't have gotten the stupid answer.
vifetoile Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 29th 2011 at 12:59:46 PM
This could be made interesting if: Any actually was that old. So old in fact that he can't tell the difference between a few years and a couple of centuries. He's actually a God in Disguise or an Eldritch Abomination masquerading as a charming human youth, but not doing so well at it, so he's gotten into the habit of adventuring, so that he doesn't spend enough time in one place to get notice, and so that if people do notice, he can kill them and it will look like an accident...
EponymousKid Since: Dec, 1969
Feb 12th 2011 at 2:32:22 PM
Ha. "Now we are eight" is a The Magnificent Seven reference. Also, good to know that Scald, Tayo, and Olaf are fair-haired Aesir from the North, I guess.

I think one thing you're having a hard time keeping in mind is that Tropes Are Tools. A sword is considered the standard, most common weapon in this setting, and Alex is a Standardized Hero. It flows fairly naturally that he would have a sword - and that his would be special since he's The Hero. Besides, would you really like this book any more if Alex had an oak club or a pickaxe or something?
FreezairForALimitedTime Since: Dec, 1969
Feb 12th 2011 at 3:43:37 PM
Actually, yeah, I probably would, since it'd be at the very least a glimmer of originality.

I know that Tropes Are Tools, but imagine you were using your tools to build a birdhouse. If you wanted to learn how to build one, you'd look in a guidebook, and follow the "basic birdhouse" pattern to the letter. That'd be fine. But if you want that birdhouse to win a competition, following the book pattern exactly won't endear you to anyone because it is basic, unadorned, and nothing anyone's never seen before.

This book follows every template as to-the-letter as it gets, and without anything like unique (or even lively) characterization, fascinating worldbuilding, or well-crafted prose, there's nothing worth looking at except for the So Bad Its Good factor.
EponymousKid Since: Dec, 1969
Feb 12th 2011 at 3:55:41 PM
Eh, fair enough. Sorry, I'm a compulsive Devil's Advocate. Still, despite running straight into some of my pet peeves, I really do like this LB. Keep up the good work.
Top