Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 182,185 (click to see context) :
[[WMG: [[VindicatedByHistory Some years from now, this movie is going to be considered a Pixar classic that is on par with the original]], as well as all of the pre-''[[WesternAnimation/Cars2]]'' films and ''[[WesternAnimation/InsideOut]]''.]]
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a VindicatedByHistory and a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a VindicatedByHistory and a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 109,110 (click to see context) from:
* That doesn’t make them ‘not lesbians’, it just means their relationship is never technically confirmed. (Why are some people do desperate to deny the existence of lgbt characters in anything?)
to:
* That doesn’t make them ‘not lesbians’, it just means their relationship is never technically confirmed. Likely because that brief scene was as far as Disney is willing to go in portraying them. (Why are some people do so desperate to deny the existence of lgbt characters in anything?)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* That doesn’t make them ‘not lesbians’, it just means their relationship is never technically confirmed. (Why are some people do desperate to deny the existence of lgbt characters in anything?)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Probably not. Given how long it took to animate Hank's scenes, the probability that he'd appear in the sequel (possibly as a main character) and thus need to be animated again, and the need for the third movie to be even more advanced, it's unlikely that it'll be made within 5 years. I'm personally betting on 2028, as the 2''5th'' anniversary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 153 (click to see context) from:
to:
* It's probably based on her ability to use mnemonics. Baby Dory didn't have the training to create mnemonics on a whim as her adult self does, and when she's stressed she loses the capability. She has to actively repeat information in order to retain it, and if she can't focus for whatever reason, she can't remember.
** Note that whenever she forgets something during a conversation, it's because she was distracted in some way. It's like trying to hold water; once you have it, it's somewhat easy to keep it, but drop it for a second and there's little way to get it back.
** Note that whenever she forgets something during a conversation, it's because she was distracted in some way. It's like trying to hold water; once you have it, it's somewhat easy to keep it, but drop it for a second and there's little way to get it back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
[[folder: Pre-release]]
Changed line(s) 57,58 (click to see context) from:
* Jossed.
to:
Changed line(s) 95 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[/folder]]
[[folder: Post-release]]
[[folder: Post-release]]
Changed line(s) 133,134 (click to see context) from:
* Actually, he said "I'm not losing another tentacle for you." He didn't say he lost the first one for Dory; and if he'd lost it in the garbage disposal during his first scene, I imagine he would've had some sort of reaction.
to:
Added DiffLines:
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The third film will be released in 2023, to mark the 20th anniversary of the first.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 115,116 (click to see context) from:
* I highly doubt that and hope not. Marlin has already been the focus, and I don't see a film where the least popular of the main trio saves the day working as well. At least, it's not what I would choose.
to:
* I highly doubt that and hope not. Marlin has was already been the focus, focus in the first, and I don't see a film where the least popular of the main trio saves the day working as well. At least, it's not what I would choose.
choose and not what I would like. If we're getting another film about him, we need another one about Dory, too.
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The very possible third film will take place somewhere much colder.]]
* The idea of an arctic setting (as mentioned above) could be very interesting and a nice way to switch things up after having Australia and California as the settings.
[[WMG: The protagonist of the third film will be either Gill or Hank.]]
* So we've had a movie about Marlin and Nemo, and a movie about Dory, so the main three have all had their time in the spotlight. So who should be the protagonist next? Hank would be the obvious choice, as there's obviously some history about him that has yet to be explored, and it would allow Dory to still get more screentime as she could be paired with him for the story. The other good choice would be Gill, since the Tank Gang were not only mostly left out of the second film, but were given a scene at the end that if anything, is a SequelHook for a movie about ''them''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 178,180 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: Some years from now, this movie is going to be considered a Pixar classic that is on par with the original, as well as all of the pre-''[[WesternAnimation/Cars2]]'' films and ''[[WesternAnimation/InsideOut]]''.]]
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
to:
[[WMG: [[VindicatedByHistory Some years from now, this movie is going to be considered a Pixar classic that is on par with the original, original]], as well as all of the pre-''[[WesternAnimation/Cars2]]'' films and ''[[WesternAnimation/InsideOut]]''.]]
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a VindicatedByHistory and a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a VindicatedByHistory and a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 178 (click to see context) from:
* Some years from now, this movie is going to be considered a Pixar classic that is on par with the original, as well as all of the pre-''[[WesternAnimation/Cars2]]'' films and ''[[WesternAnimation/InsideOut]]''. Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
to:
* Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Some years from now, this movie is going to be considered a Pixar classic that is on par with the original, as well as all of the pre-''[[WesternAnimation/Cars2]]'' films and ''[[WesternAnimation/InsideOut]]''. Because Pixar is currently going through a DorkAge of otherwise decidedly poor sequels, as well as a few bad original films, it simply wasn't the right time for the film to be made; as it is, it's sadly seems to have become DeaderThanDisco already. However, it's only a matter of time before it becomes a favorite among fans like it deserves to. Hopefully, if a third film is made, Pixar will have gotten back on track.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Dory's memory problems ''do'' run in her family.]]
Since Dory's parents don't have short-term memory loss, it seems reasonable to assume that Dory was mistaken about it running in her family. But that's not necessarily the case. It could be that one or more of her grandparents had it. If one (or, God forbid, both) of Jenny's parents had it, that could've been very hard for her growing up, which would do even more to explain why she's so concerned for Dory's future. It could also be where she and Charlie learned all the techniques they use to help Dory remember things.
Since Dory's parents don't have short-term memory loss, it seems reasonable to assume that Dory was mistaken about it running in her family. But that's not necessarily the case. It could be that one or more of her grandparents had it. If one (or, God forbid, both) of Jenny's parents had it, that could've been very hard for her growing up, which would do even more to explain why she's so concerned for Dory's future. It could also be where she and Charlie learned all the techniques they use to help Dory remember things.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 130,131 (click to see context) from:
* Actually, he said "I've already lost one tentacle, and I'm not losing another one for you." He didn't say he lost one for Dory; and if he'd lost it in the garbage disposal during his first scene, I imagine he would've had some sort of reaction.
to:
* Actually, he said "I've already lost one tentacle, and I'm "I'm not losing another one tentacle for you." He didn't say he lost the first one for Dory; and if he'd lost it in the garbage disposal during his first scene, I imagine he would've had some sort of reaction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 149 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Doubtful. In almost all the Baby Dory flashbacks, she was both calm and in the company of people she loves, and she still could barely remember anything even with help.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 130 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Actually, he said "I've already lost one tentacle, and I'm not losing another one for you." He didn't say he lost one for Dory; and if he'd lost it in the garbage disposal during his first scene, I imagine he would've had some sort of reaction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 112 (click to see context) from:
to:
* I highly doubt that and hope not. Marlin has already been the focus, and I don't see a film where the least popular of the main trio saves the day working as well. At least, it's not what I would choose.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 170 (click to see context) from:
* That may be true, but how is that 'less than pure'? Most of the fish we see seem perfectly happy to be living there, and for some living in captivity may be the only way they can live. Take Destiny, for example. Without Bailey's help she'd struggle to survive in the open ocean, and the MLI had no way of knowing that fish could form friendships and hel each other like that, so to them, it appeared that they were giving her the only possible life she could have. We also see the MLI helping ill and injured fish, like how they removed the plastic from Dory and helped the Tank Gang out of their bags. Keeping some fish on display and charging people to see them may just be their way of funding the work they are doing rescuing fish. They also seem to place an emphasis on education, which is useful as it helps prevent cases like Darla in the first film, where people accidentally injure or kill their pet fish. The only questionable thing I can see is the Touch Pool, as most of the creatures there seemed to live in constant fear of the 'hands'.
to:
* That may be true, but how is that 'less than pure'? Most of the fish we see seem perfectly happy to be living there, and for some living in captivity may be the only way they can live. Take Destiny, for example. Without Bailey's help she'd struggle to survive in the open ocean, and the MLI had no way of knowing that fish could form friendships and hel help each other like that, so to them, it appeared that they were giving her the only possible life she could have. We also see the MLI helping saving ill and injured fish, like how they removed the plastic from Dory and helped the Tank Gang out of their bags. Keeping some fish on display and charging people to see them may just be their way of funding the work they are doing rescuing fish. They also seem to place an emphasis on education, which is useful as it helps prevent cases like Darla in the first film, where people accidentally injure or kill their pet fish. The only questionable thing I can see is the Touch Pool, as most of the creatures there seemed to live in constant fear of the 'hands'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* That may be true, but how is that 'less than pure'? Most of the fish we see seem perfectly happy to be living there, and for some living in captivity may be the only way they can live. Take Destiny, for example. Without Bailey's help she'd struggle to survive in the open ocean, and the MLI had no way of knowing that fish could form friendships and hel each other like that, so to them, it appeared that they were giving her the only possible life she could have. We also see the MLI helping ill and injured fish, like how they removed the plastic from Dory and helped the Tank Gang out of their bags. Keeping some fish on display and charging people to see them may just be their way of funding the work they are doing rescuing fish. They also seem to place an emphasis on education, which is useful as it helps prevent cases like Darla in the first film, where people accidentally injure or kill their pet fish. The only questionable thing I can see is the Touch Pool, as most of the creatures there seemed to live in constant fear of the 'hands'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 167,168 (click to see context) from:
In short, the MLI was basically just a zoo.
to:
In short, the MLI was basically just a zoo.an aquarium.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* The sea lions Fluke and Rudder were both released from the institute
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 158,159 (click to see context) from:
[[spoiler: Nothing in the Finding Nemo stinger rules out the possibility that they weren't able to break the filter(or they couldn't figure out how--it was rather complex and sealed after all--but later got lucky with it malfunctioning) until possibly months later. It's possible that they had only been traveling for a couple weeks at most, which would make their survival more believable.]]
to:
[[spoiler: Nothing in the Finding Nemo stinger rules out the possibility that they weren't able to break the filter(or filter (or they couldn't figure out how--it was rather complex and sealed after all--but later got lucky with it malfunctioning) until possibly months later. It's possible that they had only been traveling for a couple weeks at most, which would make their survival more believable.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44,45 (click to see context) from:
* Mostly Jossed, but Confirmed in that ''do'' get an appearance in TheStinger.
to:
* Mostly Jossed, but Confirmed in that they ''do'' get an appearance in TheStinger.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
Until the filmmakers saw Blackfish, the movie was going to end with some of the characters going to a Seaworld-type theme park, but the ending is being altered. Perhaps they're going to end up in more of an ocean animal sanctuary where they're fed and people come to see them, but they can come and go as they please.
to:
Until the filmmakers saw Blackfish, ''Film/{{Blackfish}}'', the movie was going to end with some of the characters going to a Seaworld-type theme park, but the ending is being altered. Perhaps they're going to end up in more of an ocean animal sanctuary where they're fed and people come to see them, but they can come and go as they please.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The MLI's motives are less than pure.]]
The MLI has no intention of releasing most of their animals. Or possibly any. As soon as Dory was caught, she was tagged to go to Cleveland with the rest of the blue tangs, even though nothing was wrong with her. Even if the humans could tell she had memory problems, given that she was tagged the second she arrived, no such testing could've possibly been done. She was tagged simply because she was another pretty blue tang.
Nothing seems to be wrong with the majority of the animals at the MLI either. Nothing seemed to be wrong with Dory's parents or any of the other blue tangs. Or any of the fish in that tank. And some exhibits are obviously just for recreation, such as the touch pool. There was even a live clam in a tank. What could possibly be wrong with the clam that it couldn't be released?! The only animals that had anything wrong with them were Bailey and Destiny.
The only animal there was even remotely evidence for possible release was Hank. And there's two things wrong with that. First being that we only have his word to go on that he was being released. He could've been mistaken. Second is that assuming he was being released, it could've been because he has a tendency to break out of his enclosure (getting Dory wasn't the first time since the workers comment that he got out "again").
In short, the MLI was basically just a zoo.
The MLI has no intention of releasing most of their animals. Or possibly any. As soon as Dory was caught, she was tagged to go to Cleveland with the rest of the blue tangs, even though nothing was wrong with her. Even if the humans could tell she had memory problems, given that she was tagged the second she arrived, no such testing could've possibly been done. She was tagged simply because she was another pretty blue tang.
Nothing seems to be wrong with the majority of the animals at the MLI either. Nothing seemed to be wrong with Dory's parents or any of the other blue tangs. Or any of the fish in that tank. And some exhibits are obviously just for recreation, such as the touch pool. There was even a live clam in a tank. What could possibly be wrong with the clam that it couldn't be released?! The only animals that had anything wrong with them were Bailey and Destiny.
The only animal there was even remotely evidence for possible release was Hank. And there's two things wrong with that. First being that we only have his word to go on that he was being released. He could've been mistaken. Second is that assuming he was being released, it could've been because he has a tendency to break out of his enclosure (getting Dory wasn't the first time since the workers comment that he got out "again").
In short, the MLI was basically just a zoo.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: [[spoiler: The Tank Gang hadn't actually been traveling the entire year between movies.]]]]
[[spoiler: Nothing in the Finding Nemo stinger rules out the possibility that they weren't able to break the filter(or they couldn't figure out how--it was rather complex and sealed after all--but later got lucky with it malfunctioning) until possibly months later. It's possible that they had only been traveling for a couple weeks at most, which would make their survival more believable.]]
[[spoiler: Nothing in the Finding Nemo stinger rules out the possibility that they weren't able to break the filter(or they couldn't figure out how--it was rather complex and sealed after all--but later got lucky with it malfunctioning) until possibly months later. It's possible that they had only been traveling for a couple weeks at most, which would make their survival more believable.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: An employee at the Marine Life Institute is biologically related to Darla]]
Why else would there be [[EasterEgg a photo of Darla]] in the office of the quarantine room?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Hank's lack of backstory is in case Pixar needs to make a third film.]]
He has some rather unique traits and, when we first see him, is the only character in any of the two movies who ''wants'' to be in human captivity. Between that, his surly attitude, his touch phobia, his missing tentacle, and his skill as an escape artist, that could make a whole movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: All Pipe Pals learn to speak whale.]]
Whale song carries really well across the ocean, and, one would assume, through pipes. It's the preferred language between pipe pals of any species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Dory's memory loss is a temporary side-effect of an anxiety disorder.]]
It explains why when she calms down, or is with someone she cares about (such as Marlin), she can suddenly remember. They destress her, and she's able to think again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
* If [[spoiler: the Open Ocean exhibit]] at the Marine Life Institute counts, this is confirmed.
to:
* If [[spoiler: Jossed. The pipes leading to the Open Ocean exhibit]] at the Marine Life Institute counts, this is confirmed.
ocean are not for casual travel.
Changed line(s) 35,36 (click to see context) from:
* Her name was Talia.
to:
* Her name was Talia.Talia, not Leah.
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Hank was kept in the touch pool area.]]
Which is why he ''really'' doesn't like being touched.
Which is why he ''really'' doesn't like being touched.
