Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheIllusionOfLife

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:''The'' Disney Animation guidebook.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:''The'' Disney Animation guidebook.]]\n
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Quality upgrade.


[[caption-width-right:350:''The'' Disney Animation bible.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:''The'' Disney Animation bible.guidebook.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:250:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_illusion_of_life_9790.jpg]]

to:

[[quoteright:250:https://static.[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_illusion_of_life_9790.jpg]]
org/pmwiki/pub/images/illusion_of_life.png]]
[[caption-width-right:350:''The'' Disney Animation bible.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Sidekick}}: One of the reasons why Disney films frequently featured sidekicks and animal companions is that Frank and Ollie believed "broad cartoon characters" would be able to carry the story more easily. Disney protagonists tended to be more grounded and did not have strong enough attitudes to carry the story alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnintentionalUncannyValley: [[DiscussedTrope Discussed]] in chapter 13, which delves into the subject of applying live action reference to animation and gives suggestions on how to avoid falling into this. %%Invoked
-->"When we say "real", we mean only what the audience accepts as being real, for obviously a real animal cannot act or emote as broadly as animators require. The more an animator goes toward caricaturing the animal, the more he seems to be capturing the essence of that animal, and the more he is creating possibilities for acting. For example, if we had drawn real deer in ''WesternAnimation/{{Bambi}}'' there would have been so little acting potential that no one would have believed the deer really existed as characters. But because we drew what people imagine a deer looks like, with a personality to match, the audience accepted our drawings as being completely real. Of course, style and design are part of this, too. A caricature cannot be made without them. But the big point is that characters on the screen appear to be most real when they can be animated to have personalities and this only can be done when there is potential for movement in all parts of the body. In other words, the more realistically animals are drawn, the less real they will appear on the screen.

Added: 45

Removed: 45

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{NSFW}}: Fred Moore's nude woman drawings.


Added DiffLines:

* {{NSFW}}: Fred Moore's nude woman drawings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS has renamed Author Existence Failure to Died During Production. Link changed accordingly.


''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be written by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from WesternAnimation/OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980s in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.

to:

''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be written by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from WesternAnimation/OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure [[DiedDuringProduction Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980s in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from WesternAnimation/OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.

The book was released in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. There is also an abridged paperback "Popular Edition" of the book that removes around 200 pages of content and starts off right around the third chapter, with the section about the 12 Principles of Animation. It also received three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Literature/TooFunnyForWords: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''Literature/TheDisneyVillain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.

to:

''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made written by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from WesternAnimation/OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's 1980s in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.

The book was released published in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. There is also an abridged paperback "Popular Edition" of the book that removes around 200 pages of content and starts off right around the third chapter, with the section about the 12 Principles of Animation. It also received three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Literature/TooFunnyForWords: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''Literature/TheDisneyVillain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to ''The Illusion of Life Life'', despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtEvolution: Given it's a history book about Disney animation, it inevitably contrasts the older stick figure and rubberhose drawing styles with the more naturalistic drawing style Disney developed and refined from the mid 1930's and onward. It particularly highlights Fred Moore's redesign of MickeyMouse in "WesternAnimation/PlutosJudgementDay" as a big step forward, by changing Mickey's design from a stiff dumbbell to a flexible, spongy pear shape.
* {{Bowdlerise}}: The WesternAnimation/{{Goofy}} character analysis near the end of the book is a condensed version that censors the original 1934 version, which made an unfortunate comparison of Goofy to a [[UncleTomFoolery "Coloured Boy"]]. The unabridged analysis was posted on [[http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=2418 Michael Sporn's Splog.]] Years later, the complete lecture would be presented in Don Hahn's book "Before Ever After", with the only change being the outdated "good natured coloured boy" line being edited into "good natured boy".

to:

* ArtEvolution: Given that it's a history book about Disney animation, it inevitably contrasts the older stick figure and rubberhose rubber hose drawing styles with the more naturalistic drawing style Disney developed and refined from the mid 1930's and onward. It particularly In particular, it highlights Fred Moore's redesign of MickeyMouse Mickey Mouse in "WesternAnimation/PlutosJudgementDay" as a big step forward, by changing Mickey's design from a stiff dumbbell to a flexible, spongy pear shape.
* {{Bowdlerise}}: The WesternAnimation/{{Goofy}} character analysis near the end of the book is a condensed version that censors the original 1934 version, which made an unfortunate comparison of Goofy to a [[UncleTomFoolery "Coloured Boy"]]. The unabridged analysis was posted on [[http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=2418 Michael Sporn's Splog.]] Years later, the complete lecture would be presented in Don Hahn's book "Before Ever After", with the only change being the outdated "good natured "good-natured coloured boy" line being edited into "good natured "good-natured boy".



* DigitalDestruction: The original 1981 book was printed on high quality paper and the illustrations were more crisp looking. When the book was reprinted later in the 80's and 90's, Disney found out that the original photographic plates for the book were lost or destroyed, so they were forced to scan pages from the original book in high quality and use them as the source materials for the reprints so they wouldn't have to go to the painstaking effort of reconstructing the entire book from scratch. While the reprints aren't bad at all, a side by side comparison of the original run and its reprints reveals a noticeable drop in printing quality.

to:

* DigitalDestruction: The original 1981 book was printed on high quality paper and the illustrations were more crisp looking. When the book was reprinted later in the 80's and 90's, Disney found out that the original photographic plates for the book were lost or destroyed, so they were forced to scan pages from the original book in high quality and use them as the source materials for the reprints so they wouldn't have to go to the painstaking effort of reconstructing the entire book from scratch. While the reprints aren't bad at all, a side by side side-by-side comparison of the original run first edition and its reprints reveals a noticeable drop in printing quality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Disney has been depreciated as a namespace.


* ArtEvolution: Given it's a history book about Disney animation, it inevitably contrasts the older stick figure and rubberhose drawing styles with the more naturalistic drawing style Disney developed and refined from the mid 1930's and onward. It particularly highlights Fred Moore's redesign of MickeyMouse in ''Disney/PlutosJudgementDay'' as a big step forward, by changing Mickey's design from a stiff dumbbell to a flexible, spongy pear shape.

to:

* ArtEvolution: Given it's a history book about Disney animation, it inevitably contrasts the older stick figure and rubberhose drawing styles with the more naturalistic drawing style Disney developed and refined from the mid 1930's and onward. It particularly highlights Fred Moore's redesign of MickeyMouse in ''Disney/PlutosJudgementDay'' "WesternAnimation/PlutosJudgementDay" as a big step forward, by changing Mickey's design from a stiff dumbbell to a flexible, spongy pear shape.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[IThoughtItMeant Has nothing to do with]] existential crises, nihilism (the books idealistic philosophy, like virtually all Disney works, is just the opposite) or with PlatonicCave.

to:

[[IThoughtItMeant [[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Has nothing to do with]] existential crises, nihilism (the books idealistic philosophy, like virtually all Disney works, is just the opposite) or with PlatonicCave.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: The book highlights the SillySymphonies short "Who Killed Cock Robin" for its caricature of iconic actress Creator/MaeWest, which so effectively caricatured her beyond the level of a ShallowParody, [[ApprovalOfGod that Mae herself lauded it!]]

to:

* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: The book highlights the SillySymphonies WesternAnimation/SillySymphonies short "Who Killed Cock Robin" for its caricature of iconic actress Creator/MaeWest, which so effectively caricatured her beyond the level of a ShallowParody, [[ApprovalOfGod that Mae herself lauded it!]]

Added: 162

Changed: 65

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompressedAdaptation: The "Popular Edition" of the book axes out 200 pages of the book and starts off right at the chapter about the 12 Principles of Animation.



* DoorStopper: Over 550 pages, it'll take you a long time to read through this thing.

to:

* DoorStopper: Over 550 pages, it'll take you a long time to read through this thing. The Popular Edition less so, since it axes 200 pages of content.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Bowdlerise}}: The {{Goofy}} character analysis near the end of the book is a condensed version that censors the original 1934 version, which made an unfortunate comparison of Goofy to a [[UncleTomFoolery "Coloured Boy"]]. The unabridged analysis was posted on [[http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=2418 Michael Sporn's Splog.]] Years later, the complete lecture would be presented in Don Hahn's book "Before Ever After", with the only change being the outdated "good natured coloured boy" line being edited into "good natured boy".

to:

* {{Bowdlerise}}: The {{Goofy}} WesternAnimation/{{Goofy}} character analysis near the end of the book is a condensed version that censors the original 1934 version, which made an unfortunate comparison of Goofy to a [[UncleTomFoolery "Coloured Boy"]]. The unabridged analysis was posted on [[http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=2418 Michael Sporn's Splog.]] Years later, the complete lecture would be presented in Don Hahn's book "Before Ever After", with the only change being the outdated "good natured coloured boy" line being edited into "good natured boy".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.

to:

''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from OswaldTheLuckyRabbit WesternAnimation/OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The book was released in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Literature/TooFunnyForWords: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''Literature/TheDisneyVillain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.

Also the TropeNamer of TheTwelvePrinciplesOfAnimation.

to:

The book was released in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. There is also an abridged paperback "Popular Edition" of the book that removes around 200 pages of content and starts off right around the third chapter, with the section about the 12 Principles of Animation. It also recieved received three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Literature/TooFunnyForWords: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''Literature/TheDisneyVillain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.

Also the TropeNamer of TheTwelvePrinciplesOfAnimation.
TheTwelvePrinciplesOfAnimation, which are discussed in the third chapter of the book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The book was released in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Too Funny For Words: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''The Disney Villain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.

to:

The book was released in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Too Funny For Words: ''Literature/TooFunnyForWords: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''The Disney Villain'' ''Literature/TheDisneyVillain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DigitalDestruction: The original 1981 book was printed on high quality paper and the illustrations were more crisp looking. When the book was reprinted later in the 80's and 90's, Disney found out that the original photographic plates for the book were lost or destroyed, so they were forced to scan pages from the original book in high quality and use them as the source materials for the reprints so they wouldn't have to go to the painstaking effort of reconstructing the entire book from scratch. While the reprints aren't bad at all, a side by side comparison of the original run and its reprints reveals a noticeable drop in printing quality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The book has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Too Funny For Words: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''The Disney Villain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.

to:

The book was released in 1981, and has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Too Funny For Words: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''The Disney Villain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[SpiritualSuccessor Spiritual Successors]]: Frank and Ollie would author two companion books; ''Too Funny For Words: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'' (which elaborates on the story and gag process at Disneys, as well as gag techniques) and ''The Disney Villain''.

to:

* [[SpiritualSuccessor Spiritual Successors]]: Frank and Ollie would author two three companion books; ''Too Funny For Words: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'' (which elaborates on the story and gag process at Disneys, as well as gag techniques) and techniques), ''The Disney Villain''.Villain'', and ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'' counts as this too, since its loaded with artwork that Frank and Ollie didn't have room to put into The Illusion of Life and even reuses the cover art for Illusion of Life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The book has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved two companion books, ''Too Funny For Words'' and ''The Disney Villain''.

to:

The book has received universal acclaim and excellent sales, considered by many to be one of the best books on animation available. It has never been out of print since. It also recieved two three companion books, also authored by Frank and Ollie; ''Too Funny For Words'' and Words: Disney's Greatest Sight Gags'', ''The Disney Villain''.
Villain'' and the making of book ''Bambi: The Story and the Film''. A companion art book, ''Treasures of Disney Animation Art'', was also published by John Canemaker (complete with identical cover art to Illusion of Life despite having completely different content), containing artwork that Frank and Ollie wanted to put into The Illusion of Life, but simply didn't have room for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[IThoughtItMeant Has nothing to do with]] existential crises, nihilism (the books lighthearted tone, like all Disney works, is just the opposite) or with PlatonicCave.

to:

[[IThoughtItMeant Has nothing to do with]] existential crises, nihilism (the books lighthearted tone, idealistic philosophy, like virtually all Disney works, is just the opposite) or with PlatonicCave.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[IThoughtItMeant Has nothing to do with]] existential crises.

to:

[[IThoughtItMeant Has nothing to do with]] existential crises.crises, nihilism (the books lighthearted tone, like all Disney works, is just the opposite) or with PlatonicCave.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.

to:

''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of DisneysNineOldMen, Creator/DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.



-->''"The old-timers were [[CantCatchUp hard pressed to keep up with the demands of the new type of animation]]. More than one man counseled the beginners, "You should learn to draw as well as possible before starting to animate." Creator/GrimNatwick, whose animation career started in New York in 1924, pointed out, "The better you can draw, the easier it'll be for you. You'll have to draw the character in all positions and from every angle; and if you can't do it, and have to stage it from some other angle, it's very restrictive and takes longer." [[DisneysNineOldMen Marc Davis]] was more philosophic a few years later; "Drawing is giving a performance; an artist is an actor who is not limited by his body, only by his ability and, perhaps, experience." Too many of the men, old and new, were full of tricks and techniques that had looked great in cartooning school [[SoLastSeason but did nothing for them at the Disney studio]]. The little shadows under the toes of the shows, the slick line, the flashy verve of clothing reacting to violent exertion--all these devices that had impressed us in high school were of little use anymore."''

to:

-->''"The old-timers were [[CantCatchUp hard pressed to keep up with the demands of the new type of animation]]. More than one man counseled the beginners, "You should learn to draw as well as possible before starting to animate." Creator/GrimNatwick, whose animation career started in New York in 1924, pointed out, "The better you can draw, the easier it'll be for you. You'll have to draw the character in all positions and from every angle; and if you can't do it, and have to stage it from some other angle, it's very restrictive and takes longer." [[DisneysNineOldMen [[Creator/DisneysNineOldMen Marc Davis]] was more philosophic a few years later; "Drawing is giving a performance; an artist is an actor who is not limited by his body, only by his ability and, perhaps, experience." Too many of the men, old and new, were full of tricks and techniques that had looked great in cartooning school [[SoLastSeason but did nothing for them at the Disney studio]]. The little shadows under the toes of the shows, the slick line, the flashy verve of clothing reacting to violent exertion--all these devices that had impressed us in high school were of little use anymore."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.

to:

''The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation'' [[note]]Originally titled "Disney Animation: The Illusion Of Life" prior to reprints [[/note]] is a Non-Fiction instructional/historical book that was commissioned by Creator/WaltDisney himself prior to his death to be made by Les Clark, who was with Disney all the way from OswaldTheLuckyRabbit up to Walt's death. However, [[AuthorExistenceFailure Clark died in 1979]] while doing preliminary research for the book. An attempt to complete the book was made in the 1980's in a large collaboration project with many surviving [[TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[TheDarkAgeOfAnimation [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age]] Disney veterans, the project being spearheaded by two of DisneysNineOldMen, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston.



* FascinatingEyebrow: Walt Disney's thinking expression. Which coincidentially was pretty much his only expression during meetings.
* HistoryOfAnimation: Goes into some detail about what was going on at Disney during their [[TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age,]] and several works from TheSilentAgeOfAnimation are occasionally brought up.

to:

* FascinatingEyebrow: Walt Disney's thinking expression. Which coincidentially coincidentally was pretty much his only expression during meetings.
* HistoryOfAnimation: Goes into some detail about what was going on at Disney during their [[TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation [[UsefulNotes/TheGoldenAgeOfAnimation Golden Age]] and [[TheDarkAgeOfAnimation [[UsefulNotes/TheDarkAgeOfAnimation Dark Age,]] and several works from TheSilentAgeOfAnimation UsefulNotes/TheSilentAgeOfAnimation are occasionally brought up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Bowdlerise}}: The {{Goofy}} character analysis near the end of the book is a condensed version that censors the original 1934 version, which made an unfortunate comparison of Goofy to a [[UncleTomFoolery "Coloured Boy"]]. The unabridged analysis was posted on [[http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=2418 Michael Sporn's Splog.]]

to:

* {{Bowdlerise}}: The {{Goofy}} character analysis near the end of the book is a condensed version that censors the original 1934 version, which made an unfortunate comparison of Goofy to a [[UncleTomFoolery "Coloured Boy"]]. The unabridged analysis was posted on [[http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=2418 Michael Sporn's Splog.]]]] Years later, the complete lecture would be presented in Don Hahn's book "Before Ever After", with the only change being the outdated "good natured coloured boy" line being edited into "good natured boy".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DisneySchoolOfActingAndMime: Discussed frequently throughout the book. Frank and Ollie make a point that the reason the Disney animators do this kind of acting is because it's simply impossible for animation to match the same level of subtle acting or screen precense as live action, even with tools that closely try to emulate it like rotoscoping, and that its more sensible to exaggerate rather than directly copy real life.

to:

* DisneySchoolOfActingAndMime: Discussed frequently throughout the book. Frank and Ollie make a point that the reason the Disney animators do this kind of acting is because it's simply impossible for animation to match the same level of subtle acting or screen precense as live action, even with tools that closely try to emulate it like rotoscoping, and that its it's more sensible to exaggerate rather than directly copy real life.



* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: The book highlights the SillySymphonies short "Who Killed Cock Robin" for it's caricature of iconic actress Creator/MaeWest, which so effectively caricatured her beyond the level of a ShallowParody, [[ApprovalOfGod that Mae herself lauded it!]]

to:

* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: The book highlights the SillySymphonies short "Who Killed Cock Robin" for it's its caricature of iconic actress Creator/MaeWest, which so effectively caricatured her beyond the level of a ShallowParody, [[ApprovalOfGod that Mae herself lauded it!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DisneySchoolOfActingAndMime: Discussed frequently throughout the book. Frank and Ollie make a point that the reason the Disney animators do this kind of acting is because it's simply impossible for animation to match the same level of subtle acting as live action, even with tools that closely try to emulate it like rotoscoping, and that its more sensible to exaggerate rather than directly copy real life.

to:

* DisneySchoolOfActingAndMime: Discussed frequently throughout the book. Frank and Ollie make a point that the reason the Disney animators do this kind of acting is because it's simply impossible for animation to match the same level of subtle acting or screen precense as live action, even with tools that closely try to emulate it like rotoscoping, and that its more sensible to exaggerate rather than directly copy real life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''"The actor is trained to know these symbols of communication because they are his tools in trade. Basically, the animator is the actor in animated films. He is many other things as well; however, in his efforts to communicate his ideas, acting becomes his most important device. But the animator has a special problem. On the stage, all the foregoing symbols are accompanied by some kind of personal magnetism that can communicate the feelings and attitudes equally as well as the action itself. There is a spirit in this kind of communication that is extremely alive and vital. However, wonderful as the world of animation is, it is too crude to capture completely that kind of subtlety. If in animation we are trying to show that a character is sad, we droop the shoulders, slump the body, drop the head, add a long face, and drag the feet. Yet those same symbols also can mean that the character is tired, or discouraged, or even listless. We can add a tear and pinpoint our attitude a little better, but that is the extent of our capabilities."''

to:

->''"The -->''"The actor is trained to know these symbols of communication because they are his tools in trade. Basically, the animator is the actor in animated films. He is many other things as well; however, in his efforts to communicate his ideas, acting becomes his most important device. But the animator has a special problem. On the stage, all the foregoing symbols are accompanied by some kind of personal magnetism that can communicate the feelings and attitudes equally as well as the action itself. There is a spirit in this kind of communication that is extremely alive and vital. However, wonderful as the world of animation is, it is too crude to capture completely that kind of subtlety. If in animation we are trying to show that a character is sad, we droop the shoulders, slump the body, drop the head, add a long face, and drag the feet. Yet those same symbols also can mean that the character is tired, or discouraged, or even listless. We can add a tear and pinpoint our attitude a little better, but that is the extent of our capabilities."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->''"The actor is trained to know these symbols of communication because they are his tools in trade. Basically, the animator is the actor in animated films. He is many other things as well; however, in his efforts to communicate his ideas, acting becomes his most important device. But the animator has a special problem. On the stage, all the foregoing symbols are accompanied by some kind of personal magnetism that can communicate the feelings and attitudes equally as well as the action itself. There is a spirit in this kind of communication that is extremely alive and vital. However, wonderful as the world of animation is, it is too crude to capture completely that kind of subtlety. If in animation we are trying to show that a character is sad, we droop the shoulders, slump the body, drop the head, add a long face, and drag the feet. Yet those same symbols also can mean that the character is tired, or discouraged, or even listless. We can add a tear and pinpoint our attitude a little better, but that is the extent of our capabilities."''

Top