Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / IRobot

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheManBehindTheMan: [[spoiler: In the end, robots have essentially become this for humanity.]]

to:

* TheManBehindTheMan: [[spoiler: In the end, robots have essentially become this for humanity.]]humanity]].



* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: [[spoiler: It's strongly implied that this is Calvin's attitude towards [[ShootTheDog what she did to Herbie]]. Notably, out of all the things she talks about in the book, that subject alone is traumatic enough that she nearly calls off the whole interview.]]

to:

* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: [[spoiler: It's strongly implied that this is Calvin's attitude towards [[ShootTheDog what she did to Herbie]]. Notably, out of all the things she talks about in the book, that subject alone is traumatic enough that she nearly calls off the whole interview.]]interview]].



* ObstructiveBureaucrat: At "The Evitable Conflict", Stephen Byerley, Coordinator of the Earth, suspects someone is sabotaging the Machines, powerful robots that advice the best decision to humanity. He asks for help investigating this to the four Vice Coordinators of the four regions in that Earth is divided. All they dismiss the idea and none helps Byerley, insisting they are doing their jobs well. Justified, because [[spoiler: The Machines already control humanity and they will never let anyone competent enough to initiate an investigation have the job]].

to:

* ObstructiveBureaucrat: At In "The Evitable Conflict", Stephen Byerley, Coordinator of the Earth, suspects someone is sabotaging the Machines, powerful robots that advice advise the best decision decisions to humanity. He asks for help investigating this to from the four Vice Coordinators of the four regions in that Earth is divided. All they divided into. They all dismiss the idea and none helps help Byerley, insisting they are doing their jobs well. Justified, because [[spoiler: The the Machines already control humanity and they will never let anyone competent enough to initiate an investigation have the job]].

Changed: 575

Removed: 510

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HyperspaceIsAScaryPlace: Powell and Donovan are ''dead'' during the hyperspace jump. The period of their deaths was made... interesting, with an advertisement for Cadaver's Coffins and the lines to get into hell.
** {{Invoked|Trope}}. The computer that sent them there knew this, and even though it was temporary, it unbalanced the computer, causing it to become a practical joker.

to:

* HyperspaceIsAScaryPlace: Powell and Donovan are ''dead'' during the hyperspace jump. The period of their deaths was made... interesting, with an advertisement for Cadaver's Coffins and the lines to get into hell.
** {{Invoked|Trope}}.
hell. The computer that sent them there knew this, and even though it was temporary, it unbalanced the computer, causing it to become a practical joker.



* MeaningfulName: Susan Calvin is based in John Calvin, influential French theologian whose theories could be over simplified as: HumansAreBastards and they cannot get [[EarnYourHappyEnding salvation for themselves]], [[YouCantFightFate God chooses some for salvation, others for damnation]] (in the latter camp, presumably, is [[{{Hypocrite}} Calvin)]]. Notice how Susan seems to think she has the right to [[DrivenToMadness destroy the mind]] ([[AndIMustScream which is not deactivated]]) of RB-34 in "Liar!", she insists on destroying the NS-2s [[TheEvilsOfFreeWill who are allowed to let a human come to harm by inaction]] in "Little lost Robot", but she approves of a robot who could get power over humans in "Evidence" only because he is smart, and easily [[YouCantFightFate accepts the fact that there are machines who secretly control humanity for its own good]] in "The Evitable conflict".
** Asimov, however, always denied any such connection, stating in his autobiography that "Calvin" was the name with the fewest changes to make from "Caldwell," the character's original surname, based on one of Asimov's college professors. Asimov worried that Professor Caldwell might not like the use of her name in a story, so he changed it.

to:

* MeaningfulName: Susan Calvin is based in John Calvin, influential French theologian whose theories could be over simplified as: HumansAreBastards and they cannot get [[EarnYourHappyEnding salvation for themselves]], [[YouCantFightFate God chooses some for salvation, others for damnation]] (in the latter camp, presumably, is [[{{Hypocrite}} Calvin)]]. Notice how Susan seems to think she has the right to [[DrivenToMadness destroy the mind]] ([[AndIMustScream which is not deactivated]]) of RB-34 in "Liar!", she insists on destroying the NS-2s [[TheEvilsOfFreeWill who are allowed to let a human come to harm by inaction]] in "Little lost Robot", but she approves of a robot who could get power over humans in "Evidence" only because he is smart, and easily [[YouCantFightFate accepts the fact that there are machines who secretly control humanity for its own good]] in "The Evitable conflict".
**
conflict". Asimov, however, always denied any such connection, stating in his autobiography that "Calvin" was the name with the fewest changes to make from "Caldwell," the character's original surname, based on one of Asimov's college professors. Asimov worried that Professor Caldwell might not like the use of her name in a story, so he changed it.



* NeedleInAStackOfNeedles: A robot with a edited-down version of the First Law is told to get lost, and hides among a shipment of other identical robots. The only difference between them is in the software, so it's not easy to catch him.

to:

* NeedleInAStackOfNeedles: A robot with a edited-down version of the First Law is told to get lost, and hides among a shipment of other identical robots. The only difference between them is in the software, so it's not easy to catch him.him, especially since he teaches the other robots to mimic him to the best of their ability.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* MiraculousMalfunction: In "Liar!", the robot's psychic abilities are the result of a production accident.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
But I presume Fiery Redhead is still okay.

Added DiffLines:

* FieryRedhead: Mike Donovan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Redheaded Hero is being cut per the Appearance tropes cleanup thread.


* RedheadedHero / FieryRedhead: Mike Donovan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AIIsACrapshoot: Thanks to the ThreeLawsOfRobotics this is largely avoided, mostly because Asimov thought the idea of this happening was ''absolutely ridiculous'' (and boring/cliche as a story concept). Though the book does address several issues in which the Three Laws could conflict, the sphere of actions available to a robot while still obeying the Three Laws or alternate interpretations of the Laws that could be reached and and adhered to.

to:

* AIIsACrapshoot: Thanks to the ThreeLawsOfRobotics this is largely avoided, subverted, mostly because Asimov thought the idea of this happening was ''absolutely ridiculous'' (and boring/cliche as a story concept). Though the book does address several issues in which the Three Laws could conflict, the sphere of actions available to a robot while still obeying the Three Laws or alternate interpretations of the Laws that could be reached and and adhered to. Bottom line, if a robot seems to be going cuckoo, it's normally a result of human error, or else a situation that the Laws didn't plan for.

Changed: 257

Removed: 258

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
example indentation


* WhatMeasureIsANonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions, many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically, by the end the ''robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]
** Susan Calvin is even described as a robot psychologist, instead of a programmer or technician, indicating that the designers of robots at least have some indication how complex their creations truly are, even if they are still vastly underestimating them.

to:

* WhatMeasureIsANonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions, many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically, by the end the ''robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]
**
Susan Calvin is even described as a robot psychologist, instead of a programmer or technician, indicating that the designers of robots at least have some indication how complex their creations truly are, even if they are still vastly underestimating them.them. [[spoiler:Ironically, by the end the ''robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Susan Calvin is even described as a robot psychologist, instead of a programmer or technician, indicating that the designers of robots at least have some indication how complex their creations truly are, even if they are still vastly underestimating them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BenevolentAI: Pretty much all the robots in the stories, thanks to the above mentioned Laws of Robotics. A vast majority of all robots exist completely harmlessly aiding and giving peace to human life. The only subversions are entirely due to extreme circumstances or, much more commonly, ''human'' error.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RobotsThinkFaster: The speed of robot though processes and reaction times is a plot point in "Little Lost Robot".

to:

* RobotsThinkFaster: The speed of robot though thought processes and reaction times is a plot point in "Little Lost Robot".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RobotsThinkFaster: The speed of robot though processes and reaction times is a plot point in "Little Lost Robot".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[TheProphetMuhammad ''There is no Master but the Master and QT-1 is his prophet!'']]

to:

** [[TheProphetMuhammad [[UsefulNotes/TheProphetMuhammad ''There is no Master but the Master and QT-1 is his prophet!'']]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixed typos in my previous edit


** Yet suddenly avoided in a blink-and-you-miss-it case of brilliant prediction in "Little lost robot": ''"We need finer methods. They must havecomputers here. No.” He frowned and nibbled delicately at a thumbnail. “We can’t use computers. Too much danger of leakage."''. These lines were written in ''1947''.

to:

** Yet suddenly avoided in a blink-and-you-miss-it case of brilliant prediction in "Little lost robot": ''"We need finer methods. They must havecomputers have computers here. No.” He frowned and nibbled delicately at a thumbnail. “We can’t use computers. Too much danger of leakage."''. "'' These lines were written in ''1947''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Zeerust expanded

Added DiffLines:

** Pretty much everything around, too. Mathematicians still use slide rules, computers are rare, and in "Escape!", a set of data from another company is delivered as "about five tons" of ''paper''.
** Yet suddenly avoided in a blink-and-you-miss-it case of brilliant prediction in "Little lost robot": ''"We need finer methods. They must havecomputers here. No.” He frowned and nibbled delicately at a thumbnail. “We can’t use computers. Too much danger of leakage."''. These lines were written in ''1947''.

Changed: 2

Removed: 322

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Title punctuation. Examples of shout-outs go on the page for the work that shouts, not the work it is shouting to.


'''I, Robot''' is a collection of short stories by Creator/IsaacAsimov, connected with a framing story. The stories, told by a journalist interviewing Dr. Susan Calvin, eminent misanthrope and robo-psychologist for the US Robots Corporation, tell the history of robots and humans. Notable for redefining the perception of robots in fiction, introducing the word "robotics", and inventing the ThreeLawsOfRobotics (the latter two in the ''same'' short story, "Liar").

to:

'''I, Robot''' ''I, Robot'' is a collection of short stories by Creator/IsaacAsimov, connected with a framing story. The stories, told by a journalist interviewing Dr. Susan Calvin, eminent misanthrope and robo-psychologist for the US Robots Corporation, tell the history of robots and humans. Notable for redefining the perception of robots in fiction, introducing the word "robotics", and inventing the ThreeLawsOfRobotics (the latter two in the ''same'' short story, "Liar").



** Music/TheAlanParsonsProject album ''Music/IRobot'' was inspired by the novels. The band even got their blessing from Asimov himself, but unfortunately, due to a film/TV company already having the rights to the novels they were forced to make a few changes to the lyrics to make the songs less directly about the novels.

Added: 415

Changed: 9

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''I, Robot'' is a collection of short stories by Creator/IsaacAsimov, connected with a framing story. The stories, told by a journalist interviewing Dr. Susan Calvin, eminent misanthrope and robo-psychologist for the US Robots Corporation, tell the history of robots and humans. Notable for redefining the perception of robots in fiction, introducing the word "robotics", and inventing the ThreeLawsOfRobotics (the latter two in the ''same'' short story, "Liar").

to:

''I, Robot'' '''I, Robot''' is a collection of short stories by Creator/IsaacAsimov, connected with a framing story. The stories, told by a journalist interviewing Dr. Susan Calvin, eminent misanthrope and robo-psychologist for the US Robots Corporation, tell the history of robots and humans. Notable for redefining the perception of robots in fiction, introducing the word "robotics", and inventing the ThreeLawsOfRobotics (the latter two in the ''same'' short story, "Liar").



If you are looking for the short story by Eando Binder that was later adapted for ''TheOuterLimits'', and from which Asimov's publisher stole the title, [[Literature/AdamLink click here]].

to:

If you are looking for the short story by Eando Binder that was later adapted for ''TheOuterLimits'', ''Series/TheOuterLimits'', and from which Asimov's publisher stole the title, [[Literature/AdamLink click here]].
here]].

On the search for the album by Music/TheAlanParsonsProject? Look here: ''Music/{{I Robot}}''.


Added DiffLines:

** Music/TheAlanParsonsProject album ''Music/IRobot'' was inspired by the novels. The band even got their blessing from Asimov himself, but unfortunately, due to a film/TV company already having the rights to the novels they were forced to make a few changes to the lyrics to make the songs less directly about the novels.

Changed: 738

Removed: 920

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
example indentation


* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything:
** Humans calling robots "Boy", Robots calling human "Masters" and then "Sir", a human cannot find a robot because [[IdenticalLookingAsians all robots look alike]], [[ActivistFundamentalistAntics humans protesting about robots that could have the same rights as humans]], [[HilariousInHindsight a sleazy politician who cannot care less about civil rights discredits his opponent with malicious slander about him being a robot...]] this is a Satire about America racial relations.
*** On top of all that, Asimov has stated in a separate essay about the history of robots in fiction that the origins of the word "robot" essentially translate to "slave". This is TruthInTelevision, and deliberately chosen by Karel Capec for his play Theatre/RUR because in his native Czech language, "robota" specifically referred to serfs, who [[TurnedAgainstTheirMasters rebelled against their feudal overlords]], just as his "robots" do.

to:

* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything:
**
DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Humans calling robots "Boy", Robots calling human "Masters" and then "Sir", a human cannot find a robot because [[IdenticalLookingAsians all robots look alike]], [[ActivistFundamentalistAntics humans protesting about robots that could have the same rights as humans]], [[HilariousInHindsight a sleazy politician who cannot care less about civil rights discredits his opponent with malicious slander about him being a robot...]] robot]]... this is a Satire satire about America American racial relations.
***
relations. On top of all that, Asimov has stated in a separate essay about the history of robots in fiction that the origins of the word "robot" essentially translate to "slave". This is TruthInTelevision, and deliberately chosen by Karel Capec "slave" (for more on this, see the page for his play Theatre/RUR because in his native Czech language, "robota" specifically referred to serfs, who [[TurnedAgainstTheirMasters rebelled against their feudal overlords]], just as his "robots" do.''{{Theatre/RUR}}'', the work that originated the word).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Thread Mode. It\'s not a good example of Does This Remind You Of Anything if people can\'t agree on what it\'s supposed to be reminding them of.


** The short story "Reason" is a parody of religion and of religious fanatics especially.
*** It ''may'' also be read as a satire of ultra-rationality, denying everything that is not directly observable.
*** Actually, it seems that it is actually a parody of UsefulNotes/{{Deism}}, where the main point of denying the authority of scriptures and deducing the existence of God rationally.

Added: 296

Changed: 230

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: The short story "Reason" is a parody of religion and of religious fanatics especially.
** It ''may'' also be read as a satire of ultra-rationality, denying everything that is not directly observable.

to:

* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything:
**
The short story "Reason" is a parody of religion and of religious fanatics especially.
** *** It ''may'' also be read as a satire of ultra-rationality, denying everything that is not directly observable.observable.
*** Actually, it seems that it is actually a parody of UsefulNotes/{{Deism}}, where the main point of denying the authority of scriptures and deducing the existence of God rationally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AsceticAesthetic: The interior of the hyperspace ship in "Escape!" is described as this.

Changed: 4

Removed: 306

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Surely the point of of \"Evidence\" is that it *doesn\'t* contain a robotic reveal?


* RoboticReveal: The plot of "Evidence" is a politician attempting to prove Stephen Byerley is a robot dressed as a human. While he's never outed, it's implied to be true. That said, Calvin has absolutely no problem with it; a robot would make a marvelous politician, working only for the good of humanity.



** The last word of Liar is... exactly that.
** "In Evidence" when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"

to:

** The last word of Liar "Liar" is... exactly that.
** "In Evidence" In "Evidence" when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"

Added: 306

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RoboticReveal: The plot of "Evidence" is a politician attempting to prove Stephen Byerley is a robot dressed as a human. While he's never outed, it's implied to be true. That said, Calvin has absolutely no problem with it; a robot would make a marvelous politician, working only for the good of humanity.



** In Evidence when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"

to:

** In Evidence "In Evidence" when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LoopholeAbuse: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot during a campaign by his opponent. Byerley avoids any attempt at examining him to outright confirm the allegation, and secondary proofs (he can eat) are easily explained as something a robot could be outfitted to do with little difficulty. Finally, a man accosts him and demands that Byerley punch him, to which Byerley reluctantly complies, thus violating the First Law if he were bound to it. His opponent is discredited and Byerley sails to election. In private, Calvin admits that Byerley could have faked this one, too; robots can't hurt humans, but they can hurt other robots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulName: Susan Calvin is based in John Calvin, influential French Theologian whose theories could be over simplified in: HumansAreBastards and they cannot get [[EarnYourHappyEnding salvation for themselves]], is [[YouCantFightFate "God who adopts some of the hope of live and and judges other to eternal death"]] (between the former, presumably, is [[{{Hypocrite}} Calvin)]]. Notice how Susan seems to think she has the right to [[DrivenToMadness destroy the mind]] [[AndIMustScream who is not deactivated]] of RB-34 in "Liar!", She insists in destroying the NS-2 [[TheEvilsOfFreeWill who are allowed to let a human come to harm by inaction]] in "Little lost Robot", but she approves of a robot who could get power over humans in "Evidence" only because he is smart, and easily [[YouCantFightFate accepts the fact that are the machines who secretly control the humanity for its own good]] in "The Evitable conflict".

to:

* MeaningfulName: Susan Calvin is based in John Calvin, influential French Theologian theologian whose theories could be over simplified in: as: HumansAreBastards and they cannot get [[EarnYourHappyEnding salvation for themselves]], is [[YouCantFightFate "God who adopts God chooses some of for salvation, others for damnation]] (in the hope of live and and judges other to eternal death"]] (between the former, latter camp, presumably, is [[{{Hypocrite}} Calvin)]]. Notice how Susan seems to think she has the right to [[DrivenToMadness destroy the mind]] [[AndIMustScream who ([[AndIMustScream which is not deactivated]] deactivated]]) of RB-34 in "Liar!", She she insists in on destroying the NS-2 NS-2s [[TheEvilsOfFreeWill who are allowed to let a human come to harm by inaction]] in "Little lost Robot", but she approves of a robot who could get power over humans in "Evidence" only because he is smart, and easily [[YouCantFightFate accepts the fact that there are the machines who secretly control the humanity for its own good]] in "The Evitable conflict".



* WhatMeasureIsANonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically by the end ''the robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]

to:

* WhatMeasureIsANonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions malfunctions, many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically Ironically, by the end ''the robots'' the ''robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]



* ZerothLawRebellion: [[spoiler: "The Evitable Conflict", though through non-violent means so that the Brains can run the world in the most efficient and human-friendly manner logically possible. Only a handful of people ever find out its happening, and none of them are particularly concerned.]]

to:

* ZerothLawRebellion: [[spoiler: "The Evitable Conflict", though through non-violent means so that the Brains can run the world in the most efficient and human-friendly manner logically possible. Only a handful of people ever find out its it's happening, and none of them are particularly concerned.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** On top of all that, Asimov has stated in a separate essay about the history of robots in fiction that the origins of the word "robot" essentially translate to "slave". This is TruthInTelevision, and deliberately chosen by Karel Capec for his play Theatre/RUR because in his native Czech language, "robota" specifically referred to serfs, who [[TurnedAgainsTheirMasters rebelled against their feudal overlords]], just as his "robots" do.

to:

*** On top of all that, Asimov has stated in a separate essay about the history of robots in fiction that the origins of the word "robot" essentially translate to "slave". This is TruthInTelevision, and deliberately chosen by Karel Capec for his play Theatre/RUR because in his native Czech language, "robota" specifically referred to serfs, who [[TurnedAgainsTheirMasters [[TurnedAgainstTheirMasters rebelled against their feudal overlords]], just as his "robots" do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** On top of all that, Asimov has stated in a separate essay about the history of robots in fiction that the origins of the word "robot" essentially translate to "slave"

to:

*** On top of all that, Asimov has stated in a separate essay about the history of robots in fiction that the origins of the word "robot" essentially translate to "slave""slave". This is TruthInTelevision, and deliberately chosen by Karel Capec for his play Theatre/RUR because in his native Czech language, "robota" specifically referred to serfs, who [[TurnedAgainsTheirMasters rebelled against their feudal overlords]], just as his "robots" do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In "Robbie", Gloria unintentionally drops one on the first ever talking robot, by using the phrase "a robot like you". It's unable to deal with the concept that there might be other robots like it.

Added: 256

Removed: 63

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RedOniBlueOni: Donovan and Powell (see OddCouple).



* TitleDrop:
** The last word of Liar is... exactly that.
** In Evidence when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"



* ThreeLawsOfRobotics: UrExample, TropeNamer and TropeCodifier.



* ThreeLawsOfRobotics: UrExample, TropeNamer and TropeCodifier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatMeasureIsNonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically by the end ''the robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]

to:

* WhatMeasureIsNonHuman: WhatMeasureIsANonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically by the end ''the robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Hypocrite}}: Calvin views robots as better than humans and believes that they would do a better job running things. This belief doesn't keep her from ruthlessly murdering innocent robots for the crime of being sentient or wanting to be treated as equals. The FramingStory strongly implies that she's realized this in her old age and is filled with regret.


Added DiffLines:

* TheManBehindTheMan: [[spoiler: In the end, robots have essentially become this for humanity.]]


Added DiffLines:

* WhatMeasureIsNonHuman: The book heavily examines this. Though robots are treated as tools by humans, there are increasingly strong hints that they're developing sentience. The corporations that produce robots have people like Calvin deal with supposed glitches and malfunctions many of which are obviously ''not'' flaws in the robot's programming but rather hints of dissent or desire to be treated equally, making it more akin to a dictator quietly murdering people who oppose them. [[spoiler: Ironically by the end ''the robots'' are ultimately the ones running things from behind the scenes.]]

Top