Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / MontyPythonsLifeOfBrian

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The scene where a centurion catches Brian writing "Romanes eunt domus" on a wall and upbraids him for his poor grasp of Latin and forces him to correct his mistakes. [[spoiler:If you're wondering, "Romanes eunt domus" is very bad Latin for "Romans go home", or as the guard puts it, "People that are called Romanes, they go, the house?"... it gives the adjective for "Roman" an incorrect declension and uses an incorrect mood (indicative, when it should be imperative) for "go" and case (nominative, when it should be accusative locative) for "home". The corrected version, "Romani ite domum", is much more accurate.]]

to:

** The scene where a centurion catches Brian writing "Romanes eunt domus" on a wall and upbraids him for his poor grasp of Latin and forces him to correct his mistakes. [[spoiler:If you're wondering, "Romanes eunt domus" is very bad Latin for "Romans go home", or as the guard puts it, "People that are called Romanes, they go, go to the house?"... it gives the adjective for "Roman" an incorrect declension and uses an incorrect mood (indicative, when it should be imperative) for "go" and case (nominative, when it should be accusative locative) for "home". The corrected version, "Romani ite domum", is much more accurate.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Insane Jailer:''' ''(also in completely normal voice)'' Well, I just never really liked them, so I...

to:

'''Insane Jailer:''' ''(also in completely normal voice)'' Well, I just knew she’d never really liked them, him, so I...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BoomerangBigot: Ben, the convict played by Michael Palin who Brian briefly shares a cell with. He adores the Romans although he’s not one himself, and thinks that if it weren’t for them, "this country would be in a right bloody mess."
-->'''Ben''': '''Nail''' ‘em up, I say! Nail some sense into ‘em!

Added: 957

Changed: 525

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ComicallyMissingThePoint: At least twice. Firstly, the scene in which Brian's followers ignore his message of individuality and original thought to jump on the "Brian is the Messiah" bandwagon; and also the scene where the centurion corrects Brian's Latin, ignoring the fact that the phrase itself is treason (and painting on a wall is vandalism, although graffiti was an accepted method of advertisement back then). Even funnier is that the guard let Brian off after he covered ''the entire building he was tagging'' with the phrase, now written correctly.

to:

* ComicallyMissingThePoint: At least twice. Firstly, the Much. The film runs on this trope.
** The
scene in which Brian's followers ignore his message of individuality and original thought to jump on the "Brian is the Messiah" bandwagon; bandwagon, and also given a twist when, after the entire crowd says in unison "Yes! We’re all individuals!", one man pipes up "I’m not."
** The
scene where the centurion corrects Brian's Latin, ignoring the fact that the phrase itself is treason (and painting on a wall is vandalism, although graffiti was an accepted method of advertisement back then). Even funnier is that the then).
*** The
guard let lets Brian off after he covered ''the entire building he was tagging'' with the phrase, now written correctly.correctly.
** The People’s Front of Judea, so overly concerned with the rules of committee behaviour (and, in the "What the Romans done for us?" scene, with nitpicking accuracy) that it never accomplishes anything. Lampshaded by Judith when she urges them to rescue Brian from the Romans and they immediately start to discuss forming a committee to rescue Brian.

Added: 109

Changed: 164

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ObfuscatingInsanity: The two guards in charge of the prisoners for crucifixion. Although technically, only one of them is pretending to be insane-the other has a [[ObfuscatingDisability phony speech impediment]]:

to:

* ObfuscatingInsanity: The two ObfuscatingDisability: One of the guards in charge of the prisoners for crucifixion. Although technically, only one of them is pretending to be insane-the other crucifixion has a [[ObfuscatingDisability phony speech impediment]]:impediment.
* ObfuscatingInsanity: The other guard in charge of the prisoners for crucifixion has a phony mental illness.



'''Speech Impaired Jailer:''' Anyway, get on with the story.\\
'''Insane Jailer:''' ''(in completely normal voice)'' Well, I just never really liked them, so I...

to:

'''Speech Impaired Jailer:''' ''(in completely normal voice)'' Anyway, get on with the story.\\
'''Insane Jailer:''' ''(in ''(also in completely normal voice)'' Well, I just never really liked them, so I...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Even if he's an antagonist, Pilate is portrayed as a reasonable and decent man who oversees Judea. He only antagonizes Brian because Brian has been breaking the law. He's also genuine in his friendship with Biggus Dickus, standing up for him when his name is being insulted. And he tries his best to appease the people of Judea when it's time to release prisoners. However, it's also deconstructed that while Pilate has the best interest of his people, the people of Judea instead just wants to roll on the floor laughing at Pilate's ElmuhFuddSyndwome (and Biggus Dickus' lisp), so they go out of the way to piss him off. Also reconstructed that when Pilate almost gives up after "Welease Bwian!", he is informed that Brian is actually scheduled for crucifixion, and he quickly orders the Centurions to hurry up and release him, honoring his words (even if it's ultimately futile).

Changed: 67

Removed: 149

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%%* TheCallHasBadReception: From his followers' perspective.



%%* DerailedForDetails: Brian's attempt to tell the Parable of the Talents.



%%* EventTitle



%%* ExactWords: How Brian's followers interpret his instructions.

to:

%%* * ExactWords: How Brian's followers interpret his instructions.instructions. Justified as they really believe that Brian ''is'' the Messiah.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HoldingInLaughter: After Brian has been caught and taken before Pilate, he claims, based on what his mother told him, that he's a Roman citizen as his father was a Centurion named Naughtius Maximus. The lead Centurion informs Pilate that it's a joke name, like Sillius Soddus or Biggus Dickus. Pilate then states matter-of-factly that he had a friend in Rome named Biggus Dickus. Cue all the Roman soldiers trying not to laugh, and failing miserably, prompting Pilate to sentence at least one of them to the Arena as a Gladiator, though the man is still laughing too hysterically after being led out. Supposedly combined with EnforcedMethodActing with the extras playing the soldiers told they wouldn't be paid if they laughed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One of the guards' face ''screams'' of this when Pilate tells that Biggus Dickus "has a wife, you know". (It's rumored that extras playing the guards were told it was a serious scene and that [[EnforcedMethodActing if they laughed they'd be fired]], in which case the reaction would be real.)

to:

** One of the guards' face ''screams'' of this when Pilate tells says that Biggus Dickus "has a wife, you know". (It's rumored that extras playing the guards were told it was a serious scene and that [[EnforcedMethodActing if they laughed they'd be fired]], in which case the reaction would be real.)



** In as much as a Creator/MontyPython movie can be said to have a "sane" man, Brian usually fulfils this role. Of the Romans, the centurion played by John Cleese seems to be the only one with his head screwed on straight.
** The PFJ take it in turns to be the only sane man. Reg is the only one to realise the futility of fighting for Stan's right to do something which is biologically impossible anyway. But later it's Judith who points out that Brian will be killed if they don't stop debating with each other and take immediate action. (She is, of course, ignored.)

to:

** In as much as a Creator/MontyPython movie can be said to have a "sane" man, Brian usually fulfils fulfills this role. Of the Romans, the centurion played by John Cleese seems to be the only one with his head screwed on straight.
** The PFJ take it in turns to be the only sane man. Reg is the only one to realise realize the futility of fighting for Stan's right to do something which is biologically impossible anyway. But later it's Judith who points out that Brian will be killed if they don't stop debating with each other and take immediate action. (She is, of course, ignored.)



* ThePrankster: The guy played by Eric Idle, titled as "Mr. Cheeky", is actually one, starting from igniting the whole "Big Nose" incident, and later dashed Brian's chance to be freed by claiming himself to be Brian for kicks.

to:

* ThePrankster: The guy played by Eric Idle, titled as "Mr. Cheeky", is actually one, starting from igniting the whole "Big Nose" incident, and later dashed dashes Brian's chance to be freed by claiming himself to be Brian for kicks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* YouKnowImBlackRight: PFJ member Loretta (played by Idle) is established to be a trans woman early on. Late in the film, Judith loses her temper at Reg and the other PFJ members for wanting to decide by committee what to do about Brian's impending crucifixion and storms out. Reg comments "Another little ego trip from the feminists", prompting an indignant "What?" from Loretta, to which he then apologizes.

to:

* YouKnowImBlackRight: PFJ member Loretta (played by Idle) is established to be a trans woman early on. Late in the film, Judith loses her temper at Reg and the other PFJ members for wanting to decide by committee what to do about Brian's impending crucifixion and storms out. Reg comments "Another little ego trip from the feminists", prompting an indignant "What?" from Loretta, to which whom he then apologizes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* YouKnowImBlackRight: PFJ member Loretta (played by Idle) is established to be a trans woman early on. Late in the film, Judith loses her temper at Reg and the other PFJ members for wanting to decide by committee what to do about Brian's impending crucifixion and storms out. Reg goes, "Whoo! Women, eh?" Then he sees Loretta looking a bit hurt by that and goes, "Oh, sorry, Loretta."

to:

* YouKnowImBlackRight: PFJ member Loretta (played by Idle) is established to be a trans woman early on. Late in the film, Judith loses her temper at Reg and the other PFJ members for wanting to decide by committee what to do about Brian's impending crucifixion and storms out. Reg goes, "Whoo! Women, eh?" Then comments "Another little ego trip from the feminists", prompting an indignant "What?" from Loretta, to which he sees Loretta looking a bit hurt by that and goes, "Oh, sorry, Loretta."
then apologizes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon its release, this film drew a lot of controversy, mainly in the form of criticism from various religious groups and orders due to what was perceived as a disrespectful mockery of UsefulNotes/JesusChrist (which in turn was frequently based on the erroneous belief that Brian was intended to be/actually was Jesus, rather than just someone whose life parallelled him in several ways). Rather than mocking Jesus, however, the film actually treats the source material [[JesusWasWayCool with a lot of respect]]. It just points out that UsefulNotes/{{Christianity}} may have missed the point on some of what Jesus taught. It is not unheard of for the movie to be regarded as an AffectionateParody by actual ministers. The Pythons themselves have always maintained that the film is not [[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy blasphemous]] (IE critical of God and Jesus), but rather [[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heresy heretical]] (critical of ''the church'').

to:

Upon its release, this film drew a lot of controversy, mainly in the form of criticism from various religious groups and orders due to what was perceived as a disrespectful mockery of UsefulNotes/JesusChrist (which in turn was frequently based on the erroneous belief that Brian was intended to be/actually was Jesus, rather than just someone whose life parallelled him in several ways). Rather than mocking Jesus, however, the film actually treats the source material [[JesusWasWayCool with a lot of respect]]. It just points out that UsefulNotes/{{Christianity}} may have missed the point on some of what Jesus taught. It is not unheard of for the movie to be regarded as an AffectionateParody by actual ministers. The Pythons themselves have always maintained that the film is not [[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy blasphemous]] (IE (i.e. critical of God and Jesus), but rather [[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heresy heretical]] (critical of ''the church'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Fanservice}}: The film features a naked Graham Chapman as well as a naked Sue Jones-Davies (Judith).

to:

* {{Fanservice}}: The film features a naked Graham Chapman as well as a naked Sue Jones-Davies (Judith). Naked Terry Jones, on the other hand, falls more into FanDisservice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LogicBomb: The one man in the crowd that claims he isn't different to those who just repeated "We are all different."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhatTheRomansHaveDoneForUs: The TropeNamer; the People's Front of Judea despise Roman occupation, but even they concede that at least they are competent administrators who have brought with them many improvements to civil infrastructure and general quality of life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A Date With Rosie Palms is no longer a trope


* ADateWithRosiePalms: The opening song says that teenage Brian "started to shave and have one off the wrist."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AerithAndBob: PlayedForLaughs: the film features numerous characters with regional and period-appropriate names (e.g. "Matthias", "Judith", "UsefulNotes/{{Jesus}}", etc.) alongside people with blatantly modern British names (e.g. "Brian", "Stan", "Reg", "Mandy", etc.), making the modern comedy stick out all the more glaringly amidst the setting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PunchClockVillian: The Romans seem more exasperated with their garrison duty and the mayhem that goes on around them, than vindictive.

to:

* PunchClockVillian: PunchClockVillain: The Romans seem more exasperated with their garrison duty and the mayhem that goes on around them, than vindictive.

Added: 406

Changed: 109

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
"Jewish" isn't a language. "Yahweh" is just one of several possible Romanizations of that word. And it's not the only Hebrew name for God ("El" and "Adonai" are also widely used).


* ArtisticLicenceLinguistics: Overlapping with ArtisticLicenceReligion: while it's impossible to know exactly how the "Tetragrammaton" ("YHWH", or "יהוה", one of several Hebrew names for God) would have been pronounced in the first century, the general consensus among historians is that "Yahweh" is most likely. "Jehovah" is an alternate Romanization that didn't become widely used until the 16th century.



** From the stoning scene: the Jewish name for God is not "Jehovah", it's "YHWH" (usually pronounced "Yahweh"). As ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade'' was to observe several years later, the ''Romans'' mispronounced it "Iehovah", and then it became "Jehovah" during the Middle Ages, usually attributed to typographical errors by overworked scribes.

to:

** From the stoning scene: the Jewish name for God is not "Jehovah", it's "YHWH" (usually The Tetragrammaton (YHWH) wouldn't have been pronounced "Yahweh")."Jehovah" in the first century. As ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade'' was to observe several years later, the ''Romans'' mispronounced it "Iehovah", and then it became "Jehovah" during the Middle Ages, usually attributed to typographical errors by overworked scribes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PunchClockVillian: The Romans seem more exasperated with their garrison duty and the mayhem that goes on around them, than vindictive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Demythification}}: This movie, despite expectations, actually subverts this. It follows the whacky misadventures of a man who is repeatedly mistaken for a prophet in Roman Galilee, from his adoration by the Magi to his crucifixion by the Romans, and shows (accurately) that there were many self-proclaimed prophets in that time and place. Yet the movie does not make any comment on Jesus' nature, and he stays offscreen except for one scene early in depicting the Sermon on the Mount. Despite this, many censors considered the film blasphemous and it was denied a release in several countries for decades.

to:

* {{Demythification}}: This movie, despite expectations, actually subverts this. It follows the whacky misadventures of a man who is repeatedly mistaken for a prophet in Roman Galilee, from his adoration by the Magi to his crucifixion by the Romans, and shows (accurately) that there were many self-proclaimed prophets in that time and place. Yet the movie does not make any comment on Jesus' nature, and he stays offscreen except for one scene early in on depicting the Sermon on the Mount. Despite this, many censors considered the film blasphemous and it was denied a release in several countries for decades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DirtyCoward: It's notable that the People's Front of Judea leader, Reg, feigns a bad back to prevent himself from taking part in his group's activities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OpinionFlipFlop: Brian's mum's interest in the three wise men coming to meet Brian immediately changes when they've mentioned they've brought gold as a gift.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoneHorriblyRight: Zigzagged. Eric Idle's character gets himself un-sentenced to death twice by joking that he is innocent …but he doesn't actually ''want'' to get off his death sentence.

to:

* GoneHorriblyRight: Zigzagged. Eric Idle's character gets himself un-sentenced to death twice by joking that he is a) innocent then b) Brian …but he doesn't actually ''want'' to get off his death sentence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Demythification}}: This movie, despite expectations, actually subverts this. It follows the whacky misadventures of a man that is repeatedly mistaken for a prophet in Roman Galilee, from his adoration by the Magi to his crucifixion by the Romans, and shows (accurately) that there were many self-proclaimed prophets in that time and place. Yet the movie does not make any comment on Jesus' nature, and he stays offscreen except for one scene early in depicting the Sermon on the Mount. Despite this, many censorers considered the film blasphemous and it was denied a release in several countries for decades.

to:

* {{Demythification}}: This movie, despite expectations, actually subverts this. It follows the whacky misadventures of a man that who is repeatedly mistaken for a prophet in Roman Galilee, from his adoration by the Magi to his crucifixion by the Romans, and shows (accurately) that there were many self-proclaimed prophets in that time and place. Yet the movie does not make any comment on Jesus' nature, and he stays offscreen except for one scene early in depicting the Sermon on the Mount. Despite this, many censorers censors considered the film blasphemous and it was denied a release in several countries for decades.

Added: 156

Changed: 302

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon its release, this film drew a lot of controversy, mainly in the form of criticism from various religious groups and orders due to what was perceived as a disrespectful mockery of UsefulNotes/JesusChrist (which in turn was frequently based on the erroneous belief that Brian was intended to be/actually was Jesus, rather than just someone whose life parallelled him in several ways). Rather than mocking Jesus, however, the film actually treats the source material [[JesusWasWayCool with a lot of respect]]. It just points out that UsefulNotes/{{Christianity}} may have missed the point on some of what Jesus taught. It is not unheard of for the movie to be regarded as an AffectionateParody by actual ministers.

to:

Upon its release, this film drew a lot of controversy, mainly in the form of criticism from various religious groups and orders due to what was perceived as a disrespectful mockery of UsefulNotes/JesusChrist (which in turn was frequently based on the erroneous belief that Brian was intended to be/actually was Jesus, rather than just someone whose life parallelled him in several ways). Rather than mocking Jesus, however, the film actually treats the source material [[JesusWasWayCool with a lot of respect]]. It just points out that UsefulNotes/{{Christianity}} may have missed the point on some of what Jesus taught. It is not unheard of for the movie to be regarded as an AffectionateParody by actual ministers.
ministers. The Pythons themselves have always maintained that the film is not [[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy blasphemous]] (IE critical of God and Jesus), but rather [[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heresy heretical]] (critical of ''the church'').



* AnAesop: The film's intended message is spelled out by Brian in exactly two lines: "You don't need to follow anybody! You've got to think for yourselves!"



** People in ancient Judea have modern Anglophone names like Brian, Reg or Stan/Loretta.

to:

** [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking People in ancient Judea have modern Anglophone names like Brian, Reg or Stan/Loretta.Stan/Loretta]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LastSecondWordSwap: In "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" the word "worst" is replaced at the last minute by "best" as part of the songs' BlackComedy effect.

to:

* LastSecondWordSwap: In "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" the word "worst" is replaced at the last minute by "best" as part of the songs' song's BlackComedy effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LastSecondWordSwap: In "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" the word "worst" is replaced at the last minute by "best" as part of the songs' BlackComedy effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* DudeNotFunny: The zealots of the Suicide Battalion were envisioned as being ANaziByAnyOtherName, with pickelhauben, a symbol that was a mix of a Swastika and the Star of David, and a leader named Otto who wore a toothbrush mustache. This was all set up in a scene that was filmed and promptly cut for not being funny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MondegreenGag: At the beginning of the film, UsefulNotes/{{Jesus}} gives the Sermon on the Mount to a large crowd of observers. However, the ones at the back have a hard time understanding Him because of the distance, and one guy consequently mishears "blessed are the ''peace''makers" as "blessed are the ''cheese''makers" and "blessed are the ''meek''" as "blessed are the ''Greek''." The first mishearing sparks a minor debate over its (nonexistent) meaning, while the second is quickly corrected by another audience member's wife.

Top