Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing indentation
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
** '''Tropes applying to an individual work that already has its own page.''' Any trope specific to that work should go onto its own page. However, even if one of the creator's works does have its own page, it can still be mentioned in examples that are relevant to the creator's work as a whole.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
As per outdated Administrivia thread
** '''Tropes applying to any of their works that don't yet have their own pages.''' We normally list tropes on the relevant works page, but if that doesn't exist then we can sometimes list them on the creator's page instead. However, this is usually only appropriate if the trope is linked to the creator's own contribution to the work (e.g. a playwright's script or an actor's performance).
Changed line(s) 37,38 (click to see context) from:
!! What should ''not'' go on creator pages:
to:
!! What should ''not'' not go on creator pages:
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes that apply to ''individual'' works they've created.''' Any tropes listed should be relevant to their work as a whole, not to just one work. So if a trope only applies to ''one'' work they've made, please list it on that work's page instead.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
As per Outdated Administrivia proposal
Added DiffLines:
Note that although {{Opera}} and [[TheMusical Musicals]] go into the Theatre/ namespace, the pages covering their composers still go under Music/, not Creator/.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This was added unilaterally by someone who isn't a mod, and doesn't accurately reflect site policy. See this ATT query.
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* '''Subjectivity and YMMV.''' We don't list [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] items for real-life people. That includes creators. Please don't list AudienceReactions or [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] for a creator (unless it's for one of their works that doesn't already have a page or for their general work).
to:
* '''Subjectivity and YMMV.''' We don't list [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] items for real-life people. That includes creators. Please don't list AudienceReactions or [[YMMV.HomePage YMMV]] for a creator (unless it's for one of their works that doesn't already have a page or for their general work).page).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30,33 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes that appear frequently in their works.''' If a creator has a SignatureStyle, their creator page is a good place to talk about it. For example, Creator/MichaelBay's page lists tropes like StuffBlowingUp, SummerBlockbuster, and TechnologyPorn.
* '''Trivia about them.''' We have lots of tropes and {{Trivia}} that can legitimately apply to creators, like DyeingForYourArt, TrollingCreator, PenName, CreatorBreakdown, and DiedDuringProduction. Most of these are okay to include on a creator page. '''Do not''' create Trivia subpages for creators; just put the examples in the main article. [[note]]However, if a Creator article is doubling as a work article, Trivia subpages may contain trivia for their works.[[/note]]
* '''ConversationalTroping.''' Normally, we don't trope RealLife people. But creators often give interviews, or [[Website/{{Twitter}} tweet]], or other such forms of WordOfGod, and they often talk about tropes. So if they're [[DiscussedTrope discussing]], [[ConversedTrope conversing]], [[LampshadeHanging lampshading]], or [[InvokedTrope invoking]] tropes, those tropes are fair game for their page.
* '''Trivia about them.''' We have lots of tropes and {{Trivia}} that can legitimately apply to creators, like DyeingForYourArt, TrollingCreator, PenName, CreatorBreakdown, and DiedDuringProduction. Most of these are okay to include on a creator page. '''Do not''' create Trivia subpages for creators; just put the examples in the main article. [[note]]However, if a Creator article is doubling as a work article, Trivia subpages may contain trivia for their works.[[/note]]
* '''ConversationalTroping.''' Normally, we don't trope RealLife people. But creators often give interviews, or [[Website/{{Twitter}} tweet]], or other such forms of WordOfGod, and they often talk about tropes. So if they're [[DiscussedTrope discussing]], [[ConversedTrope conversing]], [[LampshadeHanging lampshading]], or [[InvokedTrope invoking]] tropes, those tropes are fair game for their page.
to:
* '''A trope list.''' There is no minimum trope requirement for creators. Trope lists on creator pages can include:
** '''Tropes that appear frequently in their works.''' If a creator has a SignatureStyle, their creator page is a good place to talk about it. For example, Creator/MichaelBay's page lists tropes like StuffBlowingUp, SummerBlockbuster, and TechnologyPorn.
* ** '''Trivia about them.''' We have lots of tropes and {{Trivia}} that can legitimately apply to creators, like DyeingForYourArt, TrollingCreator, PenName, CreatorBreakdown, and DiedDuringProduction. Most of these are okay to include on a creator page. '''Do not''' create Trivia subpages for creators; just put the examples in the main article. [[note]]However, if a Creator article is doubling as a work article, Trivia subpages may contain trivia for their works.[[/note]]
* ** '''ConversationalTroping.''' Normally, we don't trope RealLife people. But creators often give interviews, or [[Website/{{Twitter}} tweet]], or other such forms of WordOfGod, and they often talk about tropes. So if they're [[DiscussedTrope discussing]], [[ConversedTrope conversing]], [[LampshadeHanging lampshading]], or [[InvokedTrope invoking]] tropes, those tropes are fair game for their page.
** '''Tropes that appear frequently in their works.''' If a creator has a SignatureStyle, their creator page is a good place to talk about it. For example, Creator/MichaelBay's page lists tropes like StuffBlowingUp, SummerBlockbuster, and TechnologyPorn.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (e.g. if they've either transitioned after coming out as UsefulNotes/{{Transgender}} or changed their last name after getting married, among other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
to:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (e.g. if they've either transitioned after coming out as UsefulNotes/{{Transgender}} or changed their last name after getting married, among other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I know that this guideline was (rightly) borne out of creators transitioning, but in my experience "it felt right to change my stage name" is the most common reason by a country mile, so tweaking wording
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (usually if they've either transitioned after coming out as UsefulNotes/{{Transgender}} or had their last name changed after getting married, though there are other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
to:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (usually (e.g. if they've either transitioned after coming out as UsefulNotes/{{Transgender}} or had changed their last name changed after getting married, though there are among other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of Administrivia/SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works.
to:
* '''Tropes '''[[Administrivia/RealLifeTroping Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.character]].''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of Administrivia/SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wiki/ cleanup
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
Wiki/TVTropes is primarily about {{trope}}s and the works that use them. However, oftentimes information about an {{author|s}}, {{actor|s}}, {{director|s}}, {{producer|s}}, {{mangaka}}, {{composer|s}}, {{animator|s}}, [[VideoGameCompanies developer]], or other creator can be relevant to our understanding of the tropes in their works. To that end, we have {{Creator|s}} pages.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Thought it was weird that we had a section on changing them, but not about what they should be at first
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
to:
Creator page titles should be the name they are credited by, which often isn't their full or legal name (for example, our page for Creator/WillSmith isn't at "Willard Carroll Smith II"). If they are credited multiple ways throughout their career (such as occasionally using a PenName or the cases outlined below), the others can be used as [[Administrivia/CreatingNewRedirects redirects]] where appropriate (for example, Creator/JKRowling sometimes writes as Creator/RobertGalbraith; the latter page is a redirect to the former).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
Note, however, that not all pages about people will fall into this category. Some, such as UsefulNotes/ThePresidents, are UsefulNotes and/or {{Historical Domain Character}}s. Others are pages for {{musicians}} or {{professional wrestl|ing}}ers that, while they may look like creator pages, are actually work pages for documenting the tropes used in their performances (and should be in the Music/ and Wrestling/ Administrivia/{{namespace}}s, respectively, with the page type "work", not "creator").
to:
Note, however, that not all pages about people will fall into this category. Some, such as UsefulNotes/ThePresidents, UsefulNotes/ThePresidentsOfTheUnitedStates, are UsefulNotes and/or {{Historical Domain Character}}s. Others are pages for {{musicians}} or {{professional wrestl|ing}}ers that, while they may look like creator pages, are actually work pages for documenting the tropes used in their performances (and should be in the Music/ and Wrestling/ Administrivia/{{namespace}}s, respectively, with the page type "work", not "creator").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
better word I think
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
# If a creator was active under their previous identity, it's acceptable to mention this openly ONCE at the top of the creator page, e.g "Elliot Page (formerly credited as Ellen Page; born February 21, 1987)"
to:
# If a creator was active under their previous identity, it's acceptable appropriate to mention this openly ONCE at the top of the creator page, e.g "Elliot Page (formerly credited as Ellen Page; born February 21, 1987)"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating Wick.
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (usually if they've either transitioned after coming out as Main/{{Transgender}} or had their last name changed after getting married, though there are other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
to:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (usually if they've either transitioned after coming out as Main/{{Transgender}} UsefulNotes/{{Transgender}} or had their last name changed after getting married, though there are other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to Administrivia/ per TRS
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* '''An overview of works they've created.''' A simple bulleted list of works they've been involved with is usually a good place to start.[[note]]If one or more of their works does not yet have a wiki page associated with it, please list them as {{redlink}}s to make things easier in case the page gets created in the future.[[/note]]
to:
* '''An overview of works they've created.''' A simple bulleted list of works they've been involved with is usually a good place to start.[[note]]If one or more of their works does not yet have a wiki page associated with it, please list them as {{redlink}}s Administrivia/{{redlink}}s to make things easier in case the page gets created in the future.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
as discussed in the ATT thread
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
# If a creator was active under their previous identity, it's acceptable to mention this openly ONCE at the top of the creator page, e.g "Elliot Page (formerly Ellen Page; born February 21, 1987)"
to:
# If a creator was active under their previous identity, it's acceptable to mention this openly ONCE at the top of the creator page, e.g "Elliot Page (formerly credited as Ellen Page; born February 21, 1987)"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
altered wording somewhat, tweaked formatting so the "selected filmography" example was more clearly an example within the "creator names" section
Changed line(s) 9,13 (click to see context) from:
!Creator names
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (for example, if they've transitioned after coming out as Main/{{Transgender}} amongst other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
# If a creator only became of interest to us after they'd started using their new name, then we use their new name exclusively.
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (for example, if they've transitioned after coming out as Main/{{Transgender}} amongst other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
# If a creator only became of interest to us after they'd started using their new name, then we use their new name exclusively.
to:
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name
# If a creator only became of interest to us after
Changed line(s) 15,18 (click to see context) from:
# Any instances where we need to acknowledge that the creator was credited under their old name should be done using the [=[[note]]=]<information>[=[[/note]]=] syntax so the information is there but not blatant. For example when listing roles on a creator page, use:
!!Selected filmography[[note]]Some roles credited as <previous name>[[/note]]
!!Selected filmography[[note]]Some roles credited as <previous name>[[/note]]
to:
# Any instances where we need to acknowledge that the creator was credited under their old name should be done using the [=[[note]]=]<information>[=[[/note]]=] syntax so the information is there but not blatant. For example example, when listing roles on a creator page, use:
!!Selected !!! '''Selected filmography[[note]]Some roles credited as <previous name>[[/note]]
name>[[/note]]'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!Creator names
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (for example, if they've transitioned after coming out as Main/{{Transgender}} amongst other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
# If a creator only became of interest to us after they'd started using their new name, then we use their new name exclusively.
# If a creator was active under their previous identity, it's acceptable to mention this openly ONCE at the top of the creator page, e.g "Elliot Page (formerly Ellen Page; born February 21, 1987)"
# Any instances where we need to acknowledge that the creator was credited under their old name should be done using the [=[[note]]=]<information>[=[[/note]]=] syntax so the information is there but not blatant. For example when listing roles on a creator page, use:
!!Selected filmography[[note]]Some roles credited as <previous name>[[/note]]
<List of works>
On works pages themselves, we do the same, so an example from a page would be this:
''Film/{{Juno}}'' is a 2007 independent {{Dramedy}} film. It stars Creator/ElliotPage[[note]] credited as Ellen Page[[/note]]
When handling pages about creators (and their works) who have changed their name (for example, if they've transitioned after coming out as Main/{{Transgender}} amongst other reasons), we should use their current name and preferred pronouns. Here are some guidelines to use:
# If a creator only became of interest to us after they'd started using their new name, then we use their new name exclusively.
# If a creator was active under their previous identity, it's acceptable to mention this openly ONCE at the top of the creator page, e.g "Elliot Page (formerly Ellen Page; born February 21, 1987)"
# Any instances where we need to acknowledge that the creator was credited under their old name should be done using the [=[[note]]=]<information>[=[[/note]]=] syntax so the information is there but not blatant. For example when listing roles on a creator page, use:
!!Selected filmography[[note]]Some roles credited as <previous name>[[/note]]
<List of works>
On works pages themselves, we do the same, so an example from a page would be this:
''Film/{{Juno}}'' is a 2007 independent {{Dramedy}} film. It stars Creator/ElliotPage[[note]] credited as Ellen Page[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* '''Trivia about them.''' We have lots of tropes and {{Trivia}} that can legitimately apply to creators, like DyeingForYourArt, TrollingCreator, PenName, CreatorBreakdown, and AuthorExistenceFailure. Most of these are okay to include on a creator page. '''Do not''' create Trivia subpages for creators; just put the examples in the main article. [[note]]However, if a Creator article is doubling as a work article, Trivia subpages may contain trivia for their works.[[/note]]
to:
* '''Trivia about them.''' We have lots of tropes and {{Trivia}} that can legitimately apply to creators, like DyeingForYourArt, TrollingCreator, PenName, CreatorBreakdown, and AuthorExistenceFailure.DiedDuringProduction. Most of these are okay to include on a creator page. '''Do not''' create Trivia subpages for creators; just put the examples in the main article. [[note]]However, if a Creator article is doubling as a work article, Trivia subpages may contain trivia for their works.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Microsoft is no longer PRLC, and i can't think offhand of a replacement creator that is
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* '''CreatorBashing.''' Creator pages should not be used to complain about how much a person sucks. We're not here to hate on people. Multiple creator pages, including Creator/{{Microsoft}}, have been sent to the Administrivia/PermanentRedLinkClub because editors just couldn't resist spewing bile. Please keep it neutral.
to:
* '''CreatorBashing.''' Creator pages should not be used to complain about how much a person sucks. We're not here to hate on people. Multiple creator pages, including Creator/{{Microsoft}}, pages have been sent to the Administrivia/PermanentRedLinkClub because editors just couldn't resist spewing bile. Please keep it neutral.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Soon no longer
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* '''CreatorBashing.''' Creator pages should not be used to complain about how much a person sucks. We're not here to hate on people. Multiple creator pages, including Creator/UweBoll and Creator/{{Microsoft}}, have been sent to the Administrivia/PermanentRedLinkClub because editors just couldn't resist spewing bile. Please keep it neutral.
to:
* '''CreatorBashing.''' Creator pages should not be used to complain about how much a person sucks. We're not here to hate on people. Multiple creator pages, including Creator/UweBoll and Creator/{{Microsoft}}, have been sent to the Administrivia/PermanentRedLinkClub because editors just couldn't resist spewing bile. Please keep it neutral.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works.
to:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope Administrivia/SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
i didn't get permission to add this so i'm removing it for now
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works. For example, if an actor is famous for playing {{Deadpan Snarker|}}s, then you can use that trope as an example on their creator page, but don't use the DeadpanSnarker trope if you're referring to the actor themselves.
to:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works. For example, if an actor is famous for playing {{Deadpan Snarker|}}s, then you can use that trope as an example on their creator page, but don't use the DeadpanSnarker trope if you're referring to the actor themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works. For example, if an actor is famous for playing {{Deadpan Snarker|}}s, then you can use that trope as an example on their creator page, but don't use the DeadpanSnarker trope if you're referring to the actor themselves.
to:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works. For example, if an actor is famous for playing {{Deadpan Snarker|}}s, then you can use that trope as an example on their creator page, but don't use the DeadpanSnarker trope if you're referring to the actor themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]].
to:
* '''Tropes applied to the creator as if they are a fictional character.''' Please resist the urge to apply character tropes to RealLife people. We've had a lot of SquarePegRoundTrope issues in the past with this, so as a general guideline, it's best to apply Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease to creators. If it seems harmless it might be overlooked JustForFun, and there is an exception for ConversationalTroping as mentioned above, but on the whole this is something [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement best avoided]]. The only time such tropes can be added is if the trope in question relates to their works. For example, if an actor is famous for playing {{Deadpan Snarker|}}s, then you can use that trope as an example on their creator page, but don't use the DeadpanSnarker trope if you're referring to the actor themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
* '''Drooling.''' In the past, we've had pages for actresses that consisted primarily of gushing about how hot they are. [[Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness This is not okay.]] It's inappropriate and will not be tolerated. They don't have to dress hyper-modestly on the pictures, but their pictures must not be overly sexy either. If they did {{Fanservice}} at one moment or another, refrain from adding things like "Not that anyone is complaining".
to:
* '''Drooling.''' In the past, we've had pages for actresses that consisted primarily of gushing about how hot they are. [[Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness This is not okay.]] It's inappropriate and will not be tolerated. They don't The choice of page image doesn't have to dress hyper-modestly on the pictures, be hyper-prudish, but their pictures must not be overly avoid exaggeratedly sexy either.pin-up shots. If they did {{Fanservice}} at one moment or another, refrain from adding things like "Not that anyone is complaining".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* '''Advertising.''' Don't fill the article with links to their work or to their social media. That's not what TV Tropes is supposed to be used for, and we aren't getting paid for referrals.